Effects of technical editing in biomedical journals: a systematic review.

CONTEXT Technical editing supposedly improves the accuracy and clarity of journal articles. We examined evidence of its effects on research reports in biomedical journals. METHODS Subset of a systematic review using Cochrane methods, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases from earliest entries to February 2000 by using inclusive search terms; hand searching relevant journals. We selected comparative studies of the effects of editorial processes on original research articles between acceptance and publication in biomedical journals. Two reviewers assessed each study and performed independent data extraction. RESULTS The 11 studies on technical editing indicate that it improves the readability of articles slightly (as measured by Gunning Fog and Flesch reading ease scores), may improve other aspects of their quality, can increase the accuracy of references and quotations, and raises the quality of abstracts. Supplying authors with abstract preparation instructions had no discernible effect. CONCLUSIONS Considering the time and resources devoted to technical editing, remarkably little is know about its effects or the effects of imposing different house styles. Studies performed at 3 journals employing relatively large numbers of professional technical editors suggest that their editorial processes are associated with increases in readability and quality of articles, but these findings may not be generalizable to other journals.

[1]  Steve McDonald.  From the Cochrane Library , 2012 .

[2]  Drummond Rennie,et al.  Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. , 2002, JAMA.

[3]  R M Pitkin,et al.  Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. , 1999, JAMA.

[4]  M. Winker,et al.  The need for concrete improvement in abstract quality. , 1999, JAMA.

[5]  James Hartley,et al.  An Evaluation of Structured Abstracts in Journals Published by the British Psychological Society , 1998 .

[6]  R M Pitkin,et al.  Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial. , 1998, JAMA.

[7]  B. Crawley,et al.  Reporting of randomized clinical trial descriptors and use of structured abstracts. , 1998, JAMA.

[8]  J. Hartley,et al.  Are Structured Abstracts Easier to Read Than Traditional Ones , 1997 .

[9]  T. Einarson,et al.  Quality Assessment of Pharmacoeconomic Abstracts of Original Research Articles in Selected Journals , 1997, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[10]  Jean-Pierre EN Pierie,et al.  Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde , 1996, The Lancet.

[11]  James Hartley,et al.  Obtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient? , 1996, J. Inf. Sci..

[12]  C. Biddle,et al.  How does the peer review process influence AANA journal article readability? , 1996, AANA journal.

[13]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine. , 1994, JAMA.

[14]  S. Goodman,et al.  Do readers and peer reviewers agree on manuscript quality? , 1994, JAMA.

[15]  K. Robbins,et al.  Reference accuracy in the dermatologic literature. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[16]  S. Goodman,et al.  Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  T R Einarson,et al.  Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. , 1994, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[18]  K. Boo-Chai,et al.  How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals , 1986 .

[19]  J Haworth,et al.  How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals? , 1985, British medical journal.

[20]  R. Gunning.  The Technique of Clear Writing. , 1968 .

[21]  R. Pitkin,et al.  Effectiveness of a journal intervention to improve abstract quality. , 2000, JAMA.

[22]  A. Overbeke,et al.  [Errors in literature references in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde]. , 1992, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[23]  A. Overbeke,et al.  [The structured summary: a tool for reader and author]. , 1990, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.