Pheromone trails in the Brazilian ant Pheidole oxyops: extreme properties and dual recruitment action

Communication of feeding locations is widespread in social animals. Many ants use pheromone trails to guide nestmates to food sources, but trail properties and how they are used vary. The ant Pheidole oxyops retrieves prey cooperatively using multiple workers. The recruited workers are guided to the prey by a pheromone trail laid by the initial discoverer. In comparison to other ants, this trail has extreme properties. Despite being laid by just one ant, freshly laid trails are followed very accurately (84.4 % correct choices at a bifurcation), but decay in only 5–7 min. This extreme accuracy and short duration probably reflect adaptations to underlying differences in feeding ecology. In particular, P. oxyops needs to rapidly recruit nestmates to a precise location in a competitive environment. Rapid decay combined with a natural walking speed of 1.4 m/min should set an upper limit of 4 m (an 8-m round trip) on recruitment range. However, experimentally placed food items up to 8 m from the nest entrance were cooperatively retrieved. This greater range is due to the trail having a dual recruitment role. It not only recruits from the nest but also intercepts ants already outside the nest, causing them to join the trail. Seventy-five per cent of ants joining the trail then followed it towards the food item. Even when direct recruitment from the nest was prevented, this secondary recruitment action resulted in seven times as many ants locating a food source than by chance discovery and in items being moved 46 % sooner.

[1]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Decision making in ant foragers (Lasius niger) facing conflicting private and social information , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Alain F. Zuur,et al.  Comprar Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R | Zuur, Alain F. | 9780387874579 | Springer , 2009 .

[3]  S. D. Eneubourg Pheromone trail decay rates on different substrates in the Pharaoh’s ant, Monomorium pharaonis , 2003 .

[4]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Scavenging by Pheidole pallidula a key for understanding decision-making systems in ants , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  A. Pontin Further Considerations of Competition and the Ecology of the Ants Lasius flavus (F.) and L. niger (L.) , 1963 .

[6]  D. Sumpter,et al.  The role of multiple pheromones in food recruitment by ants , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  M. Holcombe,et al.  Decay rates of attractive and repellent pheromones in an ant foraging trail network , 2008, Insectes Sociaux.

[8]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Combined use of pheromone trails and visual landmarks by the common garden ant Lasius niger , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  James F. A. Traniello,et al.  Social organization and foraging success in Lasius neoniger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): behavioral and ecological aspects of recruitment communication , 1983, Oecologia.

[10]  Thomas S. Collett,et al.  Memory use in insect visual navigation , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Cooperative food transport in the Neotropical ant, Pheidole oxyops , 2010, Insectes Sociaux.

[12]  R. Rosengren,et al.  Memory of Location and Site Recognition in the Ant Formica uralensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2001 .

[13]  B. Hölldobler Interference strategy of Iridomyrmex pruinosum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) during foraging , 1982, Oecologia.

[14]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[15]  X. Cerdá,et al.  Critical thermal limits in Mediterranean ant species: trade‐off between mortality risk and foraging performance , 1998 .

[16]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Simple rules result in the adaptive turning of food items to reduce drag during cooperative food transport in the ant Pheidole oxyops , 2010, Insectes Sociaux.

[18]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Phase transition between disordered and ordered foraging in Pharaoh's ants , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Longevity and detection of persistent foraging trails in Pharaoh's ants, Monomorium pharaonis (L.) , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Synergy between social and private information increases foraging efficiency in ants , 2011, Biology Letters.

[21]  J. Traniello Comparative foraging ecology of north temperate ants: The role of worker size and cooperative foraging in prey selection , 1987, Insectes Sociaux.

[22]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Imprecision in waggle dances of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for nearby food sources: error or adaptation? , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  J. H. Sudd The foraging method of Pharaoh's ant, Monomorium pharaonis (L.) , 1960 .

[24]  J. H. Sudd The Transport of Prey By an Ant, Pheidole Crassinoda Em , 1960 .

[25]  O. J. Reichman,et al.  The Evolution of Food Caching by Birds and Mammals , 1984 .

[26]  H. Markl,et al.  Recruitment and food-retrieving behavior in Novomessor (Formicidae, Hymenoptera) , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  Deborah M Gordon,et al.  How Patrollers Set Foraging Direction in Harvester Ants , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[28]  J. H. Sudd The Transport of Prey By Ants , 1965 .