Ruling Out Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes for Hard Constraint Satisfaction Problems

The maximum constraint satisfaction problem (Max CSP) is the following computational problem: an instance is a finite collection of constraints on a set of variables, and the goal is to assign values to the variables that maximises the number of satisfied constraints. Max CSP captures many well-known problems (such as Max k-SAT and Max Cut) and so is NP-hard in general. It is natural to study how restrictions on the allowed constraint types (or constraint language) affect the complexity and approximability of Max CSP. All constraint languages, for which the CSP problem (i.e., the problem of deciding whether all constraints in an instance can be simultaneously satisfied) is currently known to be NP-hard, have a certain algebraic property, and it has been conjectured that CSP problems are tractable for all other constraint languages. We prove that any constraint language with this algebraic property makes Max CSP hard at gap location 1, thus ruling out the existence of a polynomial-time approximation scheme for such problems. We then apply this result to Max CSP restricted to a single constraint type. We show that, unless P = NP, such problems either are trivial or else do not admit polynomial-time approximation schemes. All our hardness results hold even if the number of occurrences of each variable is bounded by a constant.

[1]  Jaroslav Nesetril,et al.  Graphs and homomorphisms , 2004, Oxford lecture series in mathematics and its applications.

[2]  Stanley Burris,et al.  A course in universal algebra , 1981, Graduate texts in mathematics.

[3]  Pavol Hell,et al.  List homomorphisms of graphs with bounded degrees , 2007, Discret. Math..

[4]  PetrankErez The hardness of approximation , 1994 .

[5]  Peter van Beek,et al.  Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2005, 11th International Conference, CP 2005, Sitges, Spain, October 1-5, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, CP.

[6]  Gary MacGillivray,et al.  On the Complexity of Colouring by Vertex-Transitive and Arc-Transitive Digraphs , 1991, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[7]  Peter Jeavons,et al.  Classifying the Complexity of Constraints Using Finite Algebras , 2005, SIAM J. Comput..

[8]  Andrei A. Bulatov,et al.  Tractable conservative constraint satisfaction problems , 2003, 18th Annual IEEE Symposium of Logic in Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[9]  Peter Jonsson,et al.  Maximum H-colourable subdigraphs and constraint optimization with arbitrary weights , 2007, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[10]  V. Deineko,et al.  Supermodularity on chains and complexity of maximum constraint satisfaction problems , 2005 .

[11]  Martin C. Cooper,et al.  Supermodular functions and the complexity of MAX CSP , 2005, Discret. Appl. Math..

[12]  Luca Trevisan,et al.  The Approximability of Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 2001, SIAM J. Comput..

[13]  Toby Walsh,et al.  Handbook of Constraint Programming , 2006, Handbook of Constraint Programming.

[14]  Peter Jeavons,et al.  Learnability of Quantified Formulas , 1999, EuroCOLT.

[15]  Erez Petrank The hardness of approximation: Gap location , 2005, computational complexity.

[16]  Giorgio Gambosi,et al.  Complexity and Approximation , 1999, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[17]  Giorgio Gambosi,et al.  Complexity and approximation: combinatorial optimization problems and their approximability properties , 1999 .

[18]  Andrei A. Bulatov,et al.  A dichotomy theorem for constraint satisfaction problems on a 3-element set , 2006, JACM.

[19]  Andrei A. Krokhin,et al.  Maximum Constraint Satisfaction on Diamonds , 2005, CP.

[20]  Luca Trevisan,et al.  Inapproximability of Combinatorial Optimization Problems , 2004, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[21]  Reinhard Pöschel,et al.  Funktionen- und Relationenalgebren , 1979 .

[22]  Peter Jonsson,et al.  The Approximability of Three-valued MAX CSP , 2004, SIAM J. Comput..