Effects of plug-in electric vehicle charge scheduling on the day-ahead electricity market price

With the advent of plug-in electric vehicles (EV), it becomes increasingly important to study the impact of charge scheduling of a large number of EVs on the day-ahead electricity market price. In this paper, two scheduling models are proposed-joint scheduling model and aggregator scheduling model. They are used to study the effects of scheduling of EV charging on the day-ahead market price of electricity at various penetration levels of the EVs. Results from studies on an IEEE 30-bus test system show that, at lower penetration of EVs, a simple scheduling method using fixed-period charging during low demand periods can be used, without a large increase in market price. But at higher penetration levels, the opposite holds true, requiring advanced scheduling methods such as proposed in this paper. Between the two, joint scheduling model results in a lower increase in electricity price and is further tested on a simplified Nordic day-ahead market model. An overall conclusion is that the Nordic day-ahead market can accommodate large penetration of EVs without a significant increase in market price.

[1]  M. Ilic,et al.  Optimal Charge Control of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles in Deregulated Electricity Markets , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Birgitte Bak-Jensen,et al.  Integration of Vehicle-to-Grid in the Western Danish Power System , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[3]  A. Conejo,et al.  Multiperiod auction for a pool-based electricity market , 2002, 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491).

[4]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Locational marginal pricing based impact assessment of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on transmission networks , 2011 .

[5]  M. Bollen,et al.  Operation of restructured power systems , 2001 .

[6]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  Electricity Price Forecasting , 2002 .

[7]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[8]  F. Alvarado,et al.  The effect of demand elasticity on security prices for the PoolCo and multi-lateral contract models , 1997 .

[9]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[10]  David L. Waltz,et al.  Vehicle Electrification: Status and Issues , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Di Wu,et al.  Electric Energy and Power Consumption by Light-Duty Plug-In Electric Vehicles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Ola Carlson,et al.  Assessment of Electric Vehicle Charging Scenarios Based on Demographical Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  David Dallinger,et al.  Vehicle-to-Grid Regulation Reserves Based on a Dynamic Simulation of Mobility Behavior , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Multiperiod auction for a pool-based electricity market , 2002 .

[15]  Zuyi Li,et al.  Market Operations in Electric Power Systems : Forecasting, Scheduling, and Risk Management , 2002 .

[16]  M. Pantos,et al.  Exploitation of Electric-Drive Vehicles in Electricity Markets , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.