Thrust performance of isolated 36-chute suppressor plug nozzles with and without ejectors at Mach numbers from 0 to 0.45

Plug nozzles with chute-type noise suppressors were tested with and without ejector shrouds at free-stream Mach numbers from 0 to 0.45 and over a range of nozzle pressure ratios from 2 to 4. A 36-chute suppressor nozzle with an ejector had an efficiency of 94.6 percent at an assumed takeoff pressure ratio of 3.0 and a Mach number of 0.36. This represents only a 3.4 percent performance penalty when compared with the 98 percent efficiency obtained with a previously tested unsuppressed plug nozzle.

[1]  R. Chamberlin Flyover and static tests to study flight velocity effects on jet noise of suppressed and unsuppressed plug nozzle configurations , 1973 .

[2]  R. Chamberlin,et al.  Flight investigation of installation effects on a plug nozzle installed on an underwing nacelle , 1971 .

[3]  F. A. Wilcox,et al.  Comparison of ground and flight test results using a modified F106B aircraft , 1973 .

[4]  B. J. Blaha,et al.  Wind tunnel installation effects on isolated afterbodies at Mach numbers from 0.56 to 1.5 , 1969 .

[5]  D. L. Bresnahan,et al.  Cold flow investigation of a low angle turbojet plug nozzle with fixed throat and translating shroud at Mach numbers from 0 to 2.0 , 1968 .

[6]  A. Lieberman,et al.  Experimental investigation of heat-transfer characteristics of a film-cooled plug nozzle with translating shroud , 1971 .

[7]  R. J. Jeracki,et al.  Coolant flow effects on the performance of a conical plug nozzle at Mach numbers from 0 to 2.0 , 1970 .

[8]  J. F. Brausch Flight velocity influence on jet noise of conical ejector, annular plug and segmented suppressor nozzles , 1972 .

[9]  D. E. Harrington,et al.  Performance of a collapsible plug nozzle having either two-position cylindrical or variable angle floating shrouds at Mach numbers from 0 to 2.0 , 1968 .

[10]  A. L. Johns Quiescent-air performance of a truncated turbojet plug nozzle with shroud and plug base flows from a common source , 1969 .

[11]  D. E. Harrington,et al.  Thrust performance of isolated plug nozzles with two types of 40-spoke noise suppressor at Mach numbers from 0 to 0.45. [supersonic wind tunnel tests , 1974 .

[12]  R. R. Burley,et al.  Flyover and static tests to investigate external flow effect on jet noise for nonsuppressor and suppressor exhaust nozzles. , 1973 .

[13]  D. E. Harrington Performance of a 10 deg conical plug nozzle with various primary flap and nacelle configurations at Mach numbers from 0 to 1.97 , 1970 .

[14]  D. L. Bresnahan Experimental investigation of a 10 deg conical turbojet plug nozzle with translating primary and secondary shrouds at Mach numbers from 0 to 2.0 , 1969 .

[15]  J. R. Balombin,et al.  Noise evaluation of four exhaust nozzles for afterburning turbojet engine , 1970 .

[16]  R. R. Burley,et al.  Flight velocity effects on jet noise of several variations of a 48-tube suppressor installed on a plug nozzle , 1974 .

[18]  R. R. Burley,et al.  Flight investigation of acoustic and thrust characteristics of several exhaust nozzles installed on underwing nacelles on an F106 airplane , 1973 .

[19]  D. L. Bresnahan Internal performance of a 10 deg conical plug nozzle with a multispoke primary and translating external shroud , 1972 .