Simulation of high-resolution test objects using non-isocentric acquisition geometries in next-generation digital tomosynthesis

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems utilize an isocentric acquisition geometry which introduces imaging artifacts that are deleterious to image reconstructions. The next-generation tomosynthesis (NGT) prototype was designed to incorporate various x-ray source and detector motions for the purpose of investigating alternative acquisition geometries for DBT. Non-isocentric acquisition geometries, acquisitions that vary the image magnification between projection images, are capable of ameliorating aliasing and other artifacts that are intrinsic to conventional DBT. We used virtual clinical trials (VCTs) to develop custom acquisition geometries for the NGT prototype. A high-resolution (5μm voxel size) star pattern test object was simulated to compare the high-frequency performance of isocentric with non-isocentric image reconstructions. A tilted bar pattern test object was also simulated to compare multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) of isocentric and non-isocentric acquisition geometries. Two source- and detector-motion paths were simulated to obtain super-sampled image reconstructions of the test objects. An aliasing-sensitive metric was used to evaluate spatial resolution performance for two orthogonal frequency orientations. Pairwise comparisons were made for the two frequency orientations between the isocentric and non-isocentric acquisition geometries. Non-isocentric acquisition geometries show an improvement over isocentric acquisition geometries. The greatest improvement was 75.2% for frequencies aligned perpendicular to x-ray source motion, which is the direction of frequencies for which DBT is prone to aliasing. Both frequency orientations exhibit super resolution for non-isocentric geometries. MPR of the tilted bar pattern show zdependent degener

[1]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Comparing the imaging performance of computed super resolution and magnification tomosynthesis , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[3]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Evaluating the imaging performance of a next-generation digital breast tomosynthesis prototype , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Developing populations of software breast phantoms for virtual clinical trials , 2018, Other Conferences.

[5]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Personalization of x-ray tube motion in digital breast tomosynthesis using virtual Defrise phantoms , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Quantification of resolution in multiplanar reconstructions for digital breast tomosynthesis , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Simulation and experimental validation of high-resolution test objects for evaluating a next-generation digital breast tomosynthesis prototype , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[8]  E. Halpern,et al.  Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. , 2013, Radiology.

[9]  Andrew D A Maidment,et al.  Observation of super-resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2012, Medical physics.

[10]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. , 2014, JAMA.

[11]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation. , 2014, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  OpenVCT: a GPU-accelerated virtual clinical trial pipeline for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Development of a next generation tomosynthesis system , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[14]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Analysis of volume overestimation artifacts in the breast outline segmentation in tomosynthesis , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Tobias Funk,et al.  Depth-resolved registration of transesophageal echo to x-ray fluoroscopy using an inverse geometry fluoroscopy system. , 2015, Medical physics.