Asymmetric one‐storey elastic systems with non‐linear viscous and viscoelastic dampers: Simplified analysis and supplemental damping system design

Investigated is the accuracy in estimating the response of asymmetric one-storey systems with non-linear viscoelastic (VE) dampers by analysing the corresponding linear viscous system wherein all non-linear VE dampers are replaced by their energy-equivalent linear viscous dampers. The response of the corresponding linear viscous system is determined by response history analysis (RHA) and by response spectrum analysis (RSA) extended for non-classically damped systems. The flexible and stiff edge deformations and plan rotation of the corresponding linear viscous system determined by the extended RSA procedure is shown to be sufficiently accurate for design applications with errors generally between 10 and 20%. Although similar accuracy is also shown for the 'pseudo-velocity' of non-linear VE dampers, the peak force of the non-linear VE damper cannot be estimated directly from the peak damper force of the corresponding linear viscous system. A simple correction for damper force is proposed and shown to be accurate (with errors not exceeding 15%). For practical applications, an iterative linear analysis procedure is developed for determining the amplitude- and frequency-dependent supplemental damping properties of the corresponding linear viscous system and for estimating the response of asymmetric one-storey systems with non-linear VE dampers from the earthquake design (or response) spectrum. Finally, a procedure is developed for designing non-linear supplemental damping systems that satisfy given design criteria for a given design spectrum.

[1]  Rakesh K. Goel,et al.  Effects of supplemental viscous damping on seismic response of asymmetric‐plan systems , 1998 .

[2]  Anita Shukla,et al.  Optimal Use of Viscoelastic Dampers in Building Frames for Seismic Force , 1999 .

[3]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Earthquake response of elastic SDF systems with non‐linear fluid viscous dampers , 2002 .

[4]  C. Ventura,et al.  MODAL ANALYSIS OF NON-CLASSICALLY DAMPED LINEAR SYSTEMS , 1986 .

[5]  J. A. Fabunmi Extended damping models for vibration data analysis , 1985 .

[6]  S. Rakheja,et al.  Local equivalent constant representation of non‐linear damping mechanisms , 1986 .

[7]  Stefano Sorace,et al.  Non-linear dynamic modelling and design procedure of FV spring- dampers for base isolation , 2001 .

[8]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Understanding and predicting effects of supplemental viscous damping on seismic response of asymmetric one‐storey systems , 2001 .

[9]  Stefano Sorace,et al.  Iterative design procedure of fluid viscous devices included in braced frames , 1999 .

[10]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Asymmetric one‐storey elastic systems with non‐linear viscous and viscoelastic dampers: Earthquake response , 2003 .

[11]  Stuart S. Chen,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF NON-LINEAR VISCOUS DAMPERS , 1999 .

[12]  Rakesh K. Goel Simplified analysis of asymmetric structures with supplemental damping , 2001 .

[13]  Takeru Igusa,et al.  CQC and SRSS methods for non‐classically damped structures , 1995 .

[14]  A. Kiureghian Structural Response to Stationary Excitation , 1980 .