Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.1

BackgroundThe SF-36 and SF-12 summary scores were derived using an uncorrelated (orthogonal) factor solution. We estimate SF-36 and SF-12 summary scores using a correlated (oblique) physical and mental health factor model.MethodsWe administered the SF-36 to 7,093 patients who received medical care from an independent association of 48 physician groups in the western United States. Correlated physical health (PCSc) and mental health (MCSc) scores were constructed by multiplying each SF-36 scale z-score by its respective scoring coefficient from the obliquely rotated two factor solution. PCSc-12 and MCSc-12 scores were estimated using an approach similar to the one used to derive the original SF-12 summary scores.ResultsThe estimated correlation between SF-36 PCSc and MCSc scores was 0.62. There were far fewer negative factor scoring coefficients for the oblique factor solution compared to the factor scoring coefficients produced by the standard orthogonal factor solution. Similar results were found for PCSc-12, and MCSc-12 summary scores.ConclusionCorrelated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 derived from an obliquely rotated factor solution should be used along with the uncorrelated summary scores. The new scoring algorithm can reduce inconsistent results between the SF-36 scale scores and physical and mental health summary scores reported in some prior studies.(Subscripts C = correlated and UC = uncorrelated)

[1]  Barbara Gandek,et al.  Sf-12v2 How to score version 2 of the sf-12 health survey. Quality Metric Incorporated , 2002 .

[2]  C. McHorney,et al.  Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National Survey , 1994, Medical care.

[3]  R. Hays,et al.  Do differences in methods for constructing SF-36 physical and mental health summary measures change their associations with chronic medical conditions and utilization? , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[4]  M Sullivan,et al.  The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  I. Wiklund,et al.  A new self-assessment questionnaire to measure well-being in children, particularly those of short stature , 1994, Quality of Life Research.

[6]  J. Ware,et al.  Interpreting SF&-36 summary health measures: A response , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[7]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. , 1993, Health economics.

[8]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual , 1994 .

[9]  Jeffrey A. Johnson,et al.  Performance of the RAND-12 and SF-12 summary scores in type 2 diabetes , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[10]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores? , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[11]  D. Revicki,et al.  SF-36 summary scores: are physical and mental health truly distinct? , 1998, Medical care.

[12]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[13]  R H Brook,et al.  Member ratings of health care provided by 48 physician groups. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  D. Feeny,et al.  Comparing short form and RAND physical and mental health summary scores: Results from total hip arthroplasty and high-risk primary-care patients , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[15]  L. Morales,et al.  The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life , 2001, Annals of medicine.