Ripple effect modelling of supplier disruption: integrated Markov chain and dynamic Bayesian network approach

The ripple effect can occur when a supplier base disruption cannot be localised and consequently propagates downstream the supply chain (SC), adversely affecting performance. While stress-testing of SC designs and assessment of their vulnerability to disruptions in a single-echelon-single-event setting is desirable and indeed critical for some firms, modelling the ripple effect impact in multi-echelon-correlated-events systems is becoming increasingly important. Notably, ripple effect assessment in multi-stage SCs is particularly challenged by the need to consider both vulnerability and recoverability capabilities at individual firms in the network. We construct a new model based on integration of Discrete-Time Markov Chain (DTMC) and a Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) to quantify the ripple effect. We use the DTMC to model the recovery and vulnerability of suppliers. The proposed DTMC model is then equalised with a DBN model in order to simulate the propagation behaviour of supplier disruption in the SC. Finally, we propose a metric that quantifies the ripple effect of supplier disruption on manufacturers in terms of total expected utility and service level. This ripple effect metric is applied to two case studies and analysed. The findings suggest that our model can be of value in uncovering latent high-risk paths in the SC, analysing the performance impact of both a disruption and its propagation, and prioritising contingency and recovery policies.

[1]  Dmitry A. Ivanov,et al.  Disruption tails and revival policies: A simulation analysis of supply chain design and production-ordering systems in the recovery and post-disruption periods , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[2]  HosseiniSeyedmohsen,et al.  Modeling infrastructure resilience using Bayesian networks , 2016 .

[3]  Eugene Levner,et al.  Entropy-based model for the ripple effect: managing environmental risks in supply chains , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[4]  Leonie Wenz,et al.  Modeling Loss-Propagation in the Global Supply Network: The Dynamic Agent-Based Model Acclimate , 2017 .

[5]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[6]  Lawrence V. Snyder,et al.  Supply disruptions with time-dependent parameters , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  Boris Sokolov,et al.  Minimization of disruption-related return flows in the supply chain , 2017 .

[8]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain* , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[9]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Simulation-based ripple effect modelling in the supply chain , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[10]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain† , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[11]  Abdullah Al Khaled,et al.  A general framework for assessing system resilience using Bayesian networks: A case study of sulfuric acid manufacturer , 2016 .

[12]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: a Bayesian network approach , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[13]  Bruce G. Marcot,et al.  Advances in Bayesian network modelling: Integration of modelling technologies , 2019, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis , 2019, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[15]  Lin Ma,et al.  An integrated approach for system functional reliability assessment using Dynamic Bayesian Network and Hidden Markov Model , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  John Yen,et al.  Achieving High Robustness in Supply Distribution Networks by Rewiring , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Dynamic recovery policies for time-critical supply chains under conditions of ripple effect , 2016 .

[18]  Boris V. Sokolov,et al.  Optimal distribution (re)planning in a centralized multi-stage supply network under conditions of the ripple effect and structure dynamics , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Optimization of network redundancy and contingency planning in sustainable and resilient supply chain resource management under conditions of structural dynamics , 2019, Annals of Operations Research.

[20]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  Bayesian network based dynamic operational risk assessment , 2016 .

[21]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[22]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Assessing the risks of service failures based on ripple effects: A Bayesian network approach , 2013 .

[23]  Abroon Qazi,et al.  Supply chain risk network management : a Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks , 2018 .

[24]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Simultaneous structural–operational control of supply chain dynamics and resilience , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[25]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[26]  KwangSup Shin,et al.  Evaluation mechanism for structural robustness of supply chain considering disruption propagation , 2016 .

[27]  Ivanov,et al.  Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain , 2019, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science.

[28]  Kash Barker,et al.  A review of definitions and measures of system resilience , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  The Ripple effect in supply chains: trade-off ‘efficiency-flexibility-resilience’ in disruption management , 2014 .

[30]  Kash Barker,et al.  A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection , 2016 .

[31]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  ‘A blessing in disguise’ or ‘as if it wasn’t hard enough already’: reciprocal and aggravate vulnerabilities in the supply chain , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[32]  Rajagopalan Srinivasan,et al.  Agent-oriented simulation framework for handling disruptions in chemical supply chains , 2019, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[33]  D. Ivanov Structural Dynamics and Resilience in Supply Chain Risk Management , 2017 .

[34]  Seyedmohsen Hosseini,et al.  Development of a Bayesian network model for optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station , 2019, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[35]  Ole J. Mengshoel,et al.  Belief Propagation by Message Passing in Junction Trees: Computing Each Message Faster Using GPU Parallelization , 2011, UAI.

[36]  S. S. G. Lee,et al.  Quantifying disruptions propagation in a supply chain , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM).

[37]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Bayesian network modelling for supply chain risk propagation , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[38]  Tadeusz Sawik,et al.  Disruption mitigation and recovery in supply chains using portfolio approach , 2019, Omega.

[39]  W. H. Ip,et al.  On Petri net implementation of proactive resilient holistic supply chain networks , 2013 .

[40]  Yu Liu,et al.  A multiphase dynamic Bayesian networks methodology for the determination of safety integrity levels , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[41]  Rainer Lasch,et al.  Effectiveness of responsive pricing in the face of supply chain disruptions , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[42]  Kash Barker,et al.  Modeling infrastructure resilience using Bayesian networks: A case study of inland waterway ports , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[43]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Disruption-driven supply chain (re)-planning and performance impact assessment with consideration of pro-active and recovery policies , 2016 .

[44]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Supply Chain Design With Disruption Considerations: Review of Research Streams on the Ripple Effect in the Supply Chain , 2015 .

[45]  Norman Fenton,et al.  Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks , 2012 .

[46]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  A real-option approach to mitigate disruption risk in the supply chain , 2019, Omega.

[47]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[48]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Building resilience and managing post-disruption supply chain recovery: Lessons from the information and communication technology industry , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[49]  Hua Wang,et al.  The complexity measurement and evolution analysis of supply chain network under disruption risks , 2018, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals.

[50]  D. Ivanov Revealing interfaces of supply chain resilience and sustainability: a simulation study , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[51]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Structural quantification of the ripple effect in the supply chain , 2016 .

[52]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Integration of aggregate distribution and dynamic transportation planning in a supply chain with capacity disruptions and the ripple effect consideration , 2015 .

[53]  Kevin P. Scheibe,et al.  Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..