Hydromechanical modeling of critically stressed and faulted reservoirs

A critical stress state around a faulted reservoir prior to production and injection is an important factor in the hydromechanical responses during production. The purpose of this article is to show how the long-range correlations of production rates observed in several oil fields can be reproduced with hydromechanical modeling of a faulted reservoir subjected to a critical stress state prior to production operations. The modeling implies that the permeability distribution in a reservoir that is in a critical stress state is time dependent. A finite-element model with fully coupled geomechanics and flow was used. The modeling has been applied to an approximation of the complex structure of the Gullfaks reservoir in the North Sea, including the far-field stress regimes and fault systems, although the model is considerably simplified in the search for generic, instead of field-specific, principles. Under a critical stress state, a small change of the effective stress caused by fluid-pressure changes in the reservoir is likely to trigger reservoirwide hydromechanical reactions, irrespective of whether the change was at a local scale or a reservoir scale. Such responses include fault reactivations, volumetric and shear strain changes, induced deformation evolution, and permeability changes. With a permeability enhancement model, permeability increase is expected if fault reactivation and shear strain change occur. In contrast, if the in-situ stress is not at a critical state, the reservoir reacts locally. In this case, the deformation is mainly elastic, and no permeability enhancements occur. Therefore, the impact of inelastic geomechanical interactions (particularly shear deformation) at a critical point is likely to be very influential on reservoir fluid flow. This critical-point behavior gives explanation to the widespread field observations of long-range correlations in well rates, which are inferred to be manifestations of reservoir-scale mechanical responses involving faults, instead of the local hydraulic links that Darcy flow between wells implies. Permeability changes occur during inelastic deformation despite injection pressures being much lower than the confining stress (the minimum total principal stress). The increase in permeability in the reservoir rocks is caused by the dilation normal to the surface of the faults and/or fractures, which is caused by the shearing along the faults and/or fractures, instead of hydrofracturing. This confirms that dilational shearing can develop despite the effective stress regime being compressive. Dilational shearing has a major impact on the deformation of reservoir rock during production and is an important mechanism for generating conductivity on fractures under a fluid pressure that is lower than the confining stress, possibly even in reservoirs under depletion.

[1]  S. A. Miller,et al.  A forward model for earthquake generation on interacting faults including tectonics, fluids, and stress transfer , 2001 .

[2]  Ian G. Main,et al.  Statistical physics, seismogenesis, and seismic hazard , 1996 .

[3]  A. Špičák,et al.  Seismic regime of a single fault model , 1986 .

[4]  D. Sornette Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools , 2000 .

[5]  Ruth A. Harris,et al.  Introduction to Special Section: Stress Triggers, Stress Shadows, and Implications for Seismic Hazard , 1998 .

[6]  S. Crampin Implications of rock criticality for reservoir characterization , 1998 .

[7]  I. Main,et al.  Experimental constraints on the diagenetic self-sealing capacity of faults in high porosity rocks , 2000 .

[8]  Christopher H. Scholz,et al.  Theory of time-dependent rupture in the Earth , 1981 .

[9]  David J. Sanderson,et al.  Numerical study of fluid flow of deforming fractured rocks using dual permeability model , 2002 .

[10]  L. R. Sykes,et al.  Evolving Towards a Critical Point: A Review of Accelerating Seismic Moment/Energy Release Prior to Large and Great Earthquakes , 1999 .

[11]  I. Main,et al.  Entropy, energy, and proximity to criticality in global earthquake populations , 2002 .

[12]  E. Z. Lajtai,et al.  Strength of Discontinuous Rocks in Direct Shear , 1969 .

[13]  I. Main,et al.  Fault sealing during deformation-band growth in porous sandstone , 2000 .

[14]  I. Main,et al.  Testing self-organized criticality in the crust using entropy: A regionalized study of the CMT global earthquake catalogue , 2003 .

[15]  S. Burley,et al.  Textural and permeability characteristics of faulted, high porosity sandstones , 1994 .

[16]  Antonin Settari,et al.  Advances in Coupled Geomechanical and Reservoir Modeling With Applications to Reservoir Compaction , 2001 .

[17]  D. Sanderson,et al.  Numerical modelling of the effects of fault slip on fluid flow around extensional faults , 1996 .

[18]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Statistical physics approach to understanding the multiscale dynamics of earthquake fault systems , 2003 .

[19]  I. Main,et al.  Numerical simulation of seismicity due to fluid injection in a brittle poroelastic medium , 1999 .

[20]  Teng-fong Wong,et al.  The transition from brittle faulting to cataclastic flow: Permeability evolution , 1997 .

[21]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self‐Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[22]  P. Mora,et al.  Evolution of Stress Deficit and Changing Rates of Seismicity in Cellular Automaton Models of Earthquake Faults , 2000 .

[23]  James P. Evans,et al.  Fault zone architecture and permeability structure , 1996 .

[24]  N. C. Koutsabeloulis,et al.  "Coupled" Stress/Fluid/Thermal Multi-Phase Reservoir Simulation Studies Incorporating Rock Mechanics , 1997 .

[25]  C. Scholz The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting , 1990 .

[26]  M. Antonellini,et al.  Effect of Faulting on Fluid Flow in Porous Sandstones: Petrophysical Properties , 1994 .

[27]  O. Papasouliotis,et al.  The Statistical Reservoir Model: calibrating faults and fractures, and predicting reservoir response to water flood , 2007 .

[28]  Michael S. Bruno,et al.  Geomechanical and Decision Analyses for Mitigating Compaction-Related Casing Damage , 2002 .

[29]  J. Baumgärtner,et al.  Stress constraints and hydrofracturing stress data for the continental crust , 1986 .

[30]  James P. Evans,et al.  Permeability of fault-related rocks, and implications for hydraulic structure of fault zones , 1997 .

[31]  Xing Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of instability in fractured rock masses using numerical analysis methods: Effects of fracture geometry and loading direction , 2001 .

[32]  M. Zoback,et al.  Fluid flow along potentially active faults in crystalline rock: Geology , 1995 .

[33]  David J. Sanderson,et al.  Critical stress localization of flow associated with deformation of well-fractured rock masses, with implications for mineral deposits , 1999, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[34]  K. Heffer,et al.  Novel techniques show links between reservoir flow directionality, earth stress, fault structure and geomechanical changes in mature waterfloods , 1997 .

[35]  R. Sibson Implications of fault-valve behaviour for rupture nucleation and recurrence , 1992 .

[36]  William Walden Rubey,et al.  The Denver EarthquakeS. , 1968, Science.

[37]  Olav I. Barkved,et al.  Valhall Field - Still on Plateau after 20 Years of Production , 2003 .

[38]  Ian G. Main,et al.  Permeability evolution during progressive development of deformation bands in porous sandstones , 2003 .

[39]  Stuart Crampin,et al.  The fracture criticality of crustal rocks , 1994 .