Effect of quasi-static prestrain on the formability of dual phase steels in electrohydraulic forming

Abstract Dual phase steels derive their name from their microstructure, which consists of islands of martensite surrounded by a ferrite matrix. These steels are increasingly being used in automobile structures in order to reduce weight, improve fuel economy, and maintain crash safety performance. The higher strength grades of dual phase steels, such as DP780 and DP980, often present significant formability challenges in sheet stamping operations, and therefore any technologies which could alleviate these issues would be of significant value to the automotive industry. Electrohydraulic forming (EHF) is based upon the electro-hydraulic effect: a complex phenomenon related to the discharge of high voltage electrical current through a liquid. In EHF, electrical energy is stored in a bank of capacitors and is converted into the kinetic energy needed to form sheet metal by rapidly discharging that energy across a pair of electrodes submerged in a fluid. During such a discharge, a high pressure, high temperature plasma channel is created between the tips of the electrodes. The resulting shockwave in the liquid, initiated by the expansion of the plasma channel, is propagated toward the blank at the acoustic velocity of the fluid, and the mass and momentum of the water in the shock wave accelerates the sheet metal blank toward the die. The objective of this paper is to report the results of formability testing of dual phase steels under three basic conditions: (1) conventional limiting dome height (LDH) testing; (2) starting with a flat blank and using one pulse of EHF to fill the desired die geometry; and (3) starting with a quasi-static preforming step to partially fill the die cavity and then using one pulse of EHF to fill the remaining area of the die cavity. A hybrid process which combines sheet hydroforming (HF) and EHF as described herein has the potential to reduce the cycle time of the EHF process by replacing the initial EHF forming increments with one quasi-static preforming step. Additionally, a numerical model was developed and employed in order to better understand the sheet deformation process within EHF. The numerical model consists of four distinct models that are integrated into one: (1) an electrical model of the discharge channel, (2) a model of the plasma, (3) a model of the liquid as a pressure-transmitting medium, and (4) a deformable sheet metal blank in contact with a rigid die. Significant improvements in formability were confirmed experimentally for DP780 and DP980 by forming into conical and v-shape dies using EHF from a flat sheet and by using EHF combined with a quasi-static preforming step. Numerical modeling showed that the peak strain rates occurring in both single-pulse EHF the hybrid HF-EHF process are approximately 17,000 units per second.

[1]  Sergey Fedorovich Golovashchenko,et al.  Material Formability and Coil Design in Electromagnetic Forming , 2007 .

[2]  Robert Davies,et al.  Developments in high speed metal forming , 1970 .

[3]  A. Tekkaya,et al.  Electromagnetic forming—A review , 2011 .

[4]  Sergey Fedorovich Golovashchenko,et al.  Analysis of the Increased Formability of Aluminum Alloy Sheet Formed Using Electromagnetic Forming , 2005 .

[5]  Glenn S. Daehn,et al.  Production of low-volume aviation components using disposable electromagnetic actuators , 2011 .

[6]  D. Mynors,et al.  Applications and capabilities of explosive forming , 2002 .

[7]  Haiping Yu,et al.  Experimental Observations of Quasi-Static-Dynamic Formability in Biaxially Strained AA5052-O , 2011 .

[8]  A Visual Technique to Determine the Forming Limit for Sheet Materials , 2002 .

[9]  Glenn S. Daehn,et al.  Hyperplasticity: Increased forming limits at high workpiece velocity , 1994 .

[10]  Sergey Fedorovich Golovashchenko,et al.  Two-step method of forming complex shapes from sheet metal , 2011 .

[11]  Lynette Cheah,et al.  Meeting U.S. passenger vehicle fuel economy standards in 2016 and beyond , 2011 .

[12]  Richard W. Davies,et al.  Electro-hydraulic forming of sheet metals: Free-forming vs. conical-die forming , 2012 .

[13]  Richard W. Davies,et al.  Experimental Characterization of Sheet Metal Deformation During Electro-Hydraulic Forming , 2011 .

[14]  Sergey Fedorovich Golovashchenko,et al.  Analysis of Contact Stresses in High Speed Sheet Metal Forming Processes , 2012 .

[15]  E. J. Bruno,et al.  High-velocity forming of metals , 1968 .

[16]  K. S. Raghavan,et al.  Recent Progress in the Development of Forming Limit Curves for Automotive Sheet Steels , 1992 .

[17]  Alexander V. Mamutov,et al.  Electrohydraulic Sheet Metal Forming of Aluminum Panels , 2012 .