Economies of scale in the US computer industry: An empirical investigation using data envelopment analysis

Up to recently, economists have had no good tools to measure the returns to scale of individual corporations in an industry. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a linear programming technique for determining the efficiency frontier (the envelope) to the inputs and outputs of a collection of individual corporations or other productive units. While DEA offers an avenue for calculating the returns to scale of individual corporations, the approach has been riddled by mathematical complications arising from the possibility of alternate optima. The present paper develops theory for calculating the entire range of these alternate optima. Furthermore, in a quite ambitions empirical application, DEA is employed to determine the time path of returns to scale of all publicly held U.S. computer companies over the time period 1980–1991. For the great majority of companies, a unique time path is obtained; only in less than 4 percent of the linear programming calculations is an entire range of alternate optima obtained. The results indicate that the computer industry was polarized into two camps: large aging corporations with decreasing returns to scale, and swarms of small upstart companies with advanced technology exhibiting increasing returns to scale.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  Kuo-Ping Chang,et al.  Linear production functions and the data envelopment analysis , 1991 .

[3]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[4]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[5]  J. Cubbin,et al.  Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1992 .

[6]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .

[7]  A. Marshall,et al.  Principles of Economics , 1891 .

[8]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[9]  R. Banker Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis , 1984 .

[10]  George Kozmetsky,et al.  DEA of financial statements data: The U.S. computer industry , 1994 .

[11]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[12]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[13]  F. Bass,et al.  A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products , 1987 .

[14]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  A note on returns to scale in DEA , 1996 .

[15]  Jürgen Bitzer,et al.  The Computer Software Industry in East and West: Do Eastern European Countries Need a Specific Science and Technology Policy? , 1997 .

[16]  W. Arthur Positive feedbacks in the economy , 1990 .

[17]  Fred Phillips,et al.  DEA and the management of the product cycle: The U.S. computer industry , 1996, Comput. Oper. Res..

[18]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure , 1987 .

[19]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[20]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[21]  F. Bass A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[22]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Restricted best practice selection in DEA: An overview with a case study evaluating the socio-economic performance of nations , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[23]  Jean Bernard,et al.  Technological leadership and variety: A Data Envelopment Analysis for the French machinery industry , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  Gerald L. Thompson,et al.  Computational economics : economic modeling with optimization software , 1992 .

[25]  G. Debreu,et al.  Theory of Value , 1959 .