Dose-to-Duration Encoding and Signaling beyond Saturation in Intracellular Signaling Networks

The cellular response elicited by an environmental cue typically varies with the strength of the stimulus. For example, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the concentration of mating pheromone determines whether cells undergo vegetative growth, chemotropic growth, or mating. This implies that the signaling pathways responsible for detecting the stimulus and initiating a response must transmit quantitative information about the intensity of the signal. Our previous experimental results suggest that yeast encode pheromone concentration as the duration of the transmitted signal. Here we use mathematical modeling to analyze possible biochemical mechanisms for performing this “dose-to-duration” conversion. We demonstrate that modulation of signal duration increases the range of stimulus concentrations for which dose-dependent responses are possible; this increased dynamic range produces the counterintuitive result of “signaling beyond saturation” in which dose-dependent responses are still possible after apparent saturation of the receptors. We propose a mechanism for dose-to-duration encoding in the yeast pheromone pathway that is consistent with current experimental observations. Most previous investigations of information processing by signaling pathways have focused on amplitude encoding without considering temporal aspects of signal transduction. Here we demonstrate that dose-to-duration encoding provides cells with an alternative mechanism for processing and transmitting quantitative information about their surrounding environment. The ability of signaling pathways to convert stimulus strength into signal duration results directly from the nonlinear nature of these systems and emphasizes the importance of considering the dynamic properties of signaling pathways when characterizing their behavior. Understanding how signaling pathways encode and transmit quantitative information about the external environment will not only deepen our understanding of these systems but also provide insight into how to reestablish proper function of pathways that have become dysregulated by disease.

[1]  Xiufen Zou,et al.  A theoretical framework for specificity in cell signaling , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[2]  B. Errede,et al.  Pheromone-Induced Degradation of Ste12 Contributes to Signal Attenuation and the Specificity of Developmental Fate , 2006, Eukaryotic Cell.

[3]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Quantification of Short Term Signaling by the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Henrik G. Dohlman,et al.  DEP-Domain-Mediated Regulation of GPCR Signaling Responses , 2006, Cell.

[5]  Necmettin Yildirim,et al.  Regulators of G Protein Signaling and Transient Activation of Signaling , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  A. Wolfson,et al.  Neuropeptidases regulating gonadal function. , 2000, Biochemical Society transactions.

[7]  Chiaki Katagiri,et al.  Activation of ERK Induces Phosphorylation of MAPK Phosphatase-7, a JNK Specific Phosphatase, at Ser-446* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  J. Thorner,et al.  Regulation of G protein-initiated signal transduction in yeast: paradigms and principles. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[9]  J. Ferrell.  Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[10]  D. Finkelstein,et al.  Metabolism of alpha-factor by a mating type cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Transcriptional regulation via the NF-κB signaling module , 2006, Oncogene.

[12]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[13]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Transcriptional regulation via the NF-kappaB signaling module. , 2006, Oncogene.

[14]  J. Black,et al.  Operational models of pharmacological agonism , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  F. Naider,et al.  Oligomerization of the yeast alpha-factor receptor: implications for dominant negative effects of mutant receptors. , 2006, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  Gerald R. Fink,et al.  MAP Kinases with Distinct Inhibitory Functions Impart Signaling Specificity during Yeast Differentiation , 1997, Cell.

[17]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  The role of transient ERK2 signals in fibronectin- and insulin-mediated DNA synthesis. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[18]  H. Riezman,et al.  Cytoplasmic Tail Phosphorylation of the α-Factor Receptor Is Required for Its Ubiquitination and Internalization , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  Caleb J Bashor,et al.  The Ste5 Scaffold Allosterically Modulates Signaling Output of the Yeast Mating Pathway , 2006, Science.

[20]  Timothy C Elston,et al.  Mathematical and computational analysis of adaptation via feedback inhibition in signal transduction pathways. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Theodore G. Wensel,et al.  RGS Expression Rate-Limits Recovery of Rod Photoresponses , 2006, Neuron.

[22]  Jeffrey M. Becker,et al.  The α-factor mating pheromone of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a model for studying the interaction of peptide hormones and G protein-coupled receptors , 2004, Peptides.

[23]  S. Mangan,et al.  Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Quantification of information transfer via cellular signal transduction pathways , 1997, FEBS letters.

[25]  Y. Liu,et al.  Catalytic activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase phosphatase-1 by binding to p38 MAP kinase: critical role of the p38 C-terminal domain in its negative regulation. , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[26]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Transient IκB Kinase Activity Mediates Temporal NF-κB Dynamics in Response to a Wide Range of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Doses* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  W. Sabbagh,et al.  Specificity of MAP kinase signaling in yeast differentiation involves transient versus sustained MAPK activation. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[28]  M. Muda,et al.  Catalytic activation of the phosphatase MKP-3 by ERK2 mitogen-activated protein kinase. , 1998, Science.

[29]  J. Thorner,et al.  Recovery of S. cerevisiae a cells from G1 arrest by α factor pheromone requires endopeptidase action , 1979, Cell.

[30]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  The Comparative Roles of Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling-1 and -3 in the Inhibition and Desensitization of Cytokine Signaling* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  J. Becker,et al.  The alpha-factor mating pheromone of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a model for studying the interaction of peptide hormones and G protein-coupled receptors. , 2004, Peptides.

[32]  J. Segall,et al.  Polarization of yeast cells in spatial gradients of alpha mating factor. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  J. Thorner,et al.  Beta and gamma subunits of a yeast guanine nucleotide-binding protein are not essential for membrane association of the alpha subunit but are required for receptor coupling. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Shinya Kuroda,et al.  Prediction and validation of the distinct dynamics of transient and sustained ERK activation , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[35]  Ira Herskowitz,et al.  Yeast go the whole HOG for the hyperosmotic response. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[36]  A Ian Smith,et al.  Soluble metalloendopeptidases and neuroendocrine signaling. , 2002, Endocrine reviews.

[37]  M. Tyers,et al.  Regulation of the mating pheromone and invasive growth responses in yeast by two MAP kinase substrates , 1997, Current Biology.

[38]  P B Sigler,et al.  Sst2 is a GTPase-activating protein for Gpa1: purification and characterization of a cognate RGS-Galpha protein pair in yeast. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[39]  N. Engheta,et al.  Kinetics of Recovery of the Dark-adapted Salamander Rod Photoresponse , 1998, The Journal of general physiology.

[40]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast , 2007, Nature.

[41]  C. Marshall,et al.  Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: Transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation , 1995, Cell.

[42]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  A Computational Study of Feedback Effects on Signal Dynamics in a Mitogen‐Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Pathway Model , 2001, Biotechnology progress.

[43]  J. Hasty,et al.  Regulation of cell signaling dynamics by the protein kinase-scaffold Ste5. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[44]  J. Heitman,et al.  Regulators of pseudohyphal differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified through multicopy suppressor analysis in ammonium permease mutant strains. , 1998, Genetics.

[45]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Binding of alpha-factor pheromone to Saccharomyces cerevisiae a cells: dissociation constant and number of binding sites , 1986, Molecular and cellular biology.

[46]  L. Bardwell,et al.  Two novel targets of the MAP kinase Kss1 are negative regulators of invasive growth in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Genes & development.

[47]  M. Snyder,et al.  A filamentous growth response mediated by the yeast mating pathway. , 2001, Genetics.

[48]  T. Elston,et al.  Kinetic insulation as an effective mechanism for achieving pathway specificity in intracellular signaling networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.