Aftereffects support opponent coding of face gender.

Many aspects of faces derived from structural information appear to be neurally represented using norm-based opponent coding. Recently, however, Zhao, Seriès, Hancock, and Bednar (2011) have argued that another aspect with a strong structural component, namely face gender, is instead multichannel coded. Their conclusion was based on finding that face gender aftereffects initially increased but then decreased for adaptors with increasing levels of gender caricaturing. Critically, this interpretation rests on the untested assumption that caricaturing the differences between male and female composite faces increases perceived sexual dimorphism (masculinity/femininity) of faces. We tested this assumption in Study 1 and found that it held for male, but not female faces. A multichannel account cannot, therefore, be ruled out, although a decrease in realism of adaptors was observed that could have contributed to the decrease in aftereffects. However, their aftereffects likely reflect low-level retinotopic adaptation, which was not minimized for most of their participants. In Study 2 we minimized low-level adaptation and found that face gender aftereffects were strongly positively related to the perceived sexual dimorphism of adaptors. We found no decrease for extreme adaptors, despite testing adaptors with higher perceived sexual dimorphism levels than those used by Zhao et al. These results are consistent with opponent coding of higher-level dimensions related to the perception of face gender.

[1]  J. Lederberg,et al.  Size Adaptation : A New Aftereffect , 1969 .

[2]  B. Murphy,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2022 .

[3]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Distinguishing norm-based from exemplar-based coding of identity in children: evidence from face identity aftereffects. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Gyula Kovács,et al.  Neural Correlates of Generic versus Gender-specific Face Adaptation , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  T. Palmeri,et al.  Not just the norm: Exemplar-based models also predict face aftereffects , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[6]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Face Perception , 2011 .

[7]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity , 2006, Vision Research.

[8]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[9]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Sex-specific norms code face identity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[10]  E. McKone,et al.  What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation , 2010, Vision Research.

[11]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Size Adaptation: A New Aftereffect , 1969, Science.

[12]  Nine-year-old children use norm-based coding to visually represent facial expression. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  D. Perrett,et al.  Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding , 2008, Cognition.

[15]  M. Webster,et al.  Adaptation and perceptual norms in color vision. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  M. Webster,et al.  Visual adaptation and face perception , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of eye gaze adaptation. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[18]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Reduced face identity aftereffects in relatives of children with autism , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  C. Clifford,et al.  A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Mental Imagery of Faces and Places Activates Corresponding Stimulus-Specific Brain Regions , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision , 2005 .

[22]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The relationship between sexual dimorphism in human faces and fluctuating asymmetry , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  It's Pat! Sexing faces using only red and green , 2010 .

[24]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Not all face aftereffects are equal , 2012, Vision Research.

[25]  P. Hancock,et al.  Similar neural adaptation mechanisms underlying face gender and tilt aftereffects , 2011, Vision Research.

[26]  Jonathan R. McDaniel,et al.  Face Adaptation without a Face , 2010, Current Biology.

[27]  A. Javadi,et al.  Cross-Category Adaptation: Objects Produce Gender Adaptation in the Perception of Faces , 2012, PloS one.

[28]  C. Clifford Perceptual adaptation: motion parallels orientation , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? , 2005 .

[30]  Richard Russell,et al.  A Sex Difference in Facial Contrast and its Exaggeration by Cosmetics , 2009, Perception.

[31]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Satoru Suzuki,et al.  High-level Pattern Coding Revealed by Brief Shape Aftereffects , 2005 .

[33]  C. Clifford,et al.  Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a nonopponent multichannel system. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  P. V. D. Berghe,et al.  Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene culture co‐evolution?* , 1986 .

[35]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Four-to-six-year-old children use norm-based coding in face-space. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[36]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  The neural basis of categorical face perception: graded representations of face gender in fusiform and orbitofrontal cortices. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  C. Clifford,et al.  A real head turner: horizontal and vertical head directions are multichannel coded. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[38]  A. Chrysochoos,et al.  Categorical perception of facial gender information: Behavioural evidence and the face-space metaphor , 2001 .

[39]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[40]  Andrew L. Skinner,et al.  Anti-Expression Aftereffects Reveal Prototype-Referenced Coding of Facial Expressions , 2010, Psychological science.

[41]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Four year-olds use norm-based coding for face identity , 2013, Cognition.

[42]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Cross-modal face identity aftereffects and their relation to priming. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.