Five critical knowledge management organizational themes

Purpose – This study is motivated by the question ‘‘how do organizational routines influence the three knowledge management processes of acquisition, creation, utilization and sharing?’’ and accordingly it seeks to address this issue. Design/methodology/approach – A theoretical framework is first built by linking absorptive capacity (a routine-based capability) with knowledge management processes. A literature search guided by the theoretical framework, and evidence from two case studies, were used to address the objective of the study. Findings – The study elicited the organizational routines that influence the three knowledge management processes. These routines were then clustered into five key organizational themes: systemic knowledge; strategic engagement; social networking (external and internal); cultural context; process and structural context. Research limitations/implications – Several implications for research are suggested. More specifically, the study offers five propositions that can be further tested. The key limitation of this study is the use of only two case studies for empirical data, and therefore further testing is needed. Practical implications – The study shows that, although leadership behavior is critical for knowledge management, its impact depends on the platform of routines and processes built for it. The identified routines and their influence on knowledge management are invaluable for knowledge management practitioners.

[1]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[2]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism , 2009 .

[3]  U. Lichtenthaler Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes , 2009 .

[4]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning , 2004 .

[5]  J. Bessant,et al.  Innovation Management Measurement: A Review , 2006 .

[6]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[7]  S. McGaughey,et al.  Strategic Interventions in Intellectual Asset Flows , 2002 .

[8]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  An Examination of the Relationship between Absorptive Capacity and Organizational Learning, and a Proposed Integration , 2008 .

[9]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[10]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[11]  Tobias Schmidt,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: One Size Fits All? Firm-level Analysis of Absorptive Capacity for Different Kinds of Knowledge , 2005 .

[12]  R. Nelson Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? , 1991 .

[13]  K. Hewett,et al.  A Multi-Theoretical Model of Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Determinants of Knowledge Contribution and Knowledge Reuse , 2006 .

[14]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[15]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[17]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[18]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[19]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[20]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[21]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[22]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[23]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[24]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[26]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[27]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[28]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition , 2009 .

[29]  Chieh-Peng Lin To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents , 2007 .

[30]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[31]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[32]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Karim Moustaghfir,et al.  How knowledge assets lead to a sustainable competitive advantage: are organizational capabilities a missing link? , 2009 .

[34]  G. McLean,et al.  Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management , 2010 .

[35]  Peter Heisig,et al.  Harmonisation of knowledge management - comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[36]  S. Murray,et al.  Knowledge Type and Communication Media Choice in the Knowledge Transfer Process , 2007 .

[37]  Denton John,et al.  Knowledge creation and transfer , 2002 .

[38]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[39]  Mikael Holmqvist,et al.  Experiential Learning Processes of Exploitation and Exploration Within and Between Organisations : An Empirical Study of Product Development, Department of Business Studies , 2003 .

[40]  Chung-An Chen,et al.  Linking the knowledge creation process to organizational theories , 2008 .

[41]  Fawzy Soliman,et al.  Strategies for implementing knowledge management: role of human resources management , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[42]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .