Nitrogen rate and plant density effects on yield and late-season leaf senescence of cotton raised on a saline field

Abstract Plant density and nitrogen fertilization are two important practices for field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of plant density and N fertilization rate, especially their interactions, on yield, yield components, late-season leaf senescence and Cry1Ac expression in Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton under salinity conditions. To achieve this goal, we conducted a three-year experiment with a high-yielding Bt cotton cultivar (SCRC 28) in a moderately saline (ECe = 11 dS/m) field, using a split-plot design in the Yellow River Delta of China. The main plots were assigned to low, medium and high plant densities (3.0, 5.25 and 7.5 plants/m2), while low, moderate and high nitrogen rates (120, 225 and 300 kg N/ha) were assigned to the subplots. Biological yield, lint yield, yield components, harvest index, boll load, Cry1Ac expression and leaf senescence were significantly affected by plant density and N rate. Lint yield was also affected by plant density × N rate interaction. Increased plant density or N rate enhanced biological yield, but reduced harvest index. Considerably high lint yield (1604 kg/ha) was achieved only with a high dose of N fertilizer under low plant density, but comparable yields (1693 and 1643 kg/ha) were achieved with moderate and low N rate under medium and high plant density. Increased plant density and N rate reduced boll load, which had highly significant negative correlation with late-season leaf photosynthesis (r = −0.928) and significant correlation with Cry1Ac protein concentration (r = −0.8131). Leaf senescence was delayed by increasing plant density and N rate mainly due to reduced boll load and a combination of reduced boll load and nutritional effect. Medium plant density with moderate N rate or high plant density with low N rate would enhance cotton yield and moderate Cry1Ac expression at reduced cost in the Yellow River Delta of China and other areas with similar ecologies.

[1]  Zhenan Hou,et al.  Effects of fertigation scheme on N uptake and N use efficiency in cotton , 2007, Plant and Soil.

[2]  H. Dong,et al.  Heterosis in yield, endotoxin expression and some physiological parameters in Bt transgenic cotton , 2007 .

[3]  C. S. Dhawad,et al.  Temporal and intra-plant variability of Cry1Ac expression in Bt-cotton and its influence on the survival of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera(Hubner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) , 2005 .

[4]  E. Maas,et al.  CROP SALT TOLERANCE–CURRENT ASSESSMENT , 1977 .

[5]  Mingcai Zhang,et al.  NaCl salinity stress decreased Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) protein content of transgenic Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings , 2006 .

[6]  M. Awais,et al.  Effect of nitrogen on seed cotton yield and fiber qualities of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars. , 2010 .

[7]  G. Breitenbeck,et al.  Nitrogen rate effect on partitioning of nitrogen and dry matter by cotton. , 2000 .

[8]  F. Sallaku,et al.  Cotton row spacing and plant density cropping systems I. Effects on accumulation and partitioning of dry mass and LAI. , 2009 .

[9]  Craig W. Bednarz,et al.  Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities. , 2000 .

[10]  E. Feinerman.  CROP DENSITY AND IRRIGATION WITH SALINE WATER , 1983 .

[11]  R. Kohel,et al.  Field Performance of Cottons Expressing Transgenic CryIA Insecticidal Proteins for Resistance to Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) , 1996 .

[12]  R. Lal,et al.  Crop Response in Salt-Affected Soils , 2005 .

[13]  G. Beyene,et al.  Effect of water-deficit stress on cotton plants expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin , 2008 .

[14]  Catherine M Smart,et al.  Gene expression during leaf senescence. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[15]  Wei Tang,et al.  Late Planting of Short-Season Cotton in Saline Fields of the Yellow River Delta , 2010 .

[16]  B. Kimball,et al.  Response of Cotton to Varying COz, Irrigation, and Nitrogen: Yield and Growth , 1993 .

[17]  E. B. Moser,et al.  Nitrogen Effects on Boll Production of Field‐Grown Cotton , 1993 .

[18]  Wei Tang,et al.  Furrow Seeding with Plastic Mulching Increases Stand Establishment and Lint Yield of Cotton in a Saline Field , 2008 .

[19]  Wei Tang,et al.  Early plastic mulching increases stand establishment and lint yield of cotton in saline fields. , 2009 .

[20]  Wei Tang,et al.  Yield, quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varying planting dates and plant densities in the Yellow River Valley of China , 2006 .

[21]  P. Wright.  Premature senescence of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) – Predominantly a potassium disorder caused by an imbalance of source and sink , 1999, Plant and Soil.

[22]  D. Boquet.  Cotton in Ultra‐Narrow Row Spacing: Plant Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates , 2005 .

[23]  T. A. Kerby,et al.  Genotypes and Plant Densities for Narrow‐Row Cotton Systems. I. Height, Nodes, Earliness, and Location of Yield , 1990 .

[24]  M. Qadir,et al.  Some Agronomic and Physiological Aspects of Salt Tolerance in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) , 1997 .

[25]  Dongmei Zhang,et al.  Effects of cotton rootstock on endogenous cytokinins and abscisic acid in xylem sap and leaves in relation to leaf senescence. , 2008, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  D. Llewellyn,et al.  Field performance and seasonal changes in the efficacy against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) of transgenic cotton expressing the insecticidal protein vip3A , 2007 .

[27]  A. Bleecker,et al.  Last exit: senescence, abscission, and meristem arrest in Arabidopsis. , 1997, The Plant cell.

[28]  G. Ye,et al.  The effect of high temperature on the insecticidal properties of Bt Cotton , 2005 .

[29]  Wei Tang,et al.  Effects of plant density and nitrogen and potassium fertilization on cotton yield and uptake of major nutrients in two fields with varying fertility , 2010 .

[30]  D. Oosterhuis,et al.  Canopy photosynthesis, growth, yield, and boll 15N accumulation under nitrogen stress in cotton , 1996 .

[31]  L. Francois.  Narrow row cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under saline conditions , 1982, Irrigation Science.

[32]  E. L. Clawson,et al.  Timing of Maturity in Ultra‐Narrow and Conventional Row Cotton as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate , 2008 .

[33]  K. R. Reddy,et al.  Growth responses of cotton to aldicarb and temperature , 1997 .

[34]  J. D. Clement,et al.  Alteration of cotton source–sink relations with plant population density and mepiquat chloride , 2010 .

[35]  L. A. Richards.  Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils , 1954 .

[36]  W. Pettigrew,et al.  Nitrogen Fertility and Planting Date Effects on Lint Yield and Cry1Ac (Bt) Endotoxin Production , 2006 .

[37]  T. C. Tucker,et al.  Nitrogen Effects on Cotton: I. Vegetative and Fruiting Characteristics1 , 1967 .

[38]  S. Higgs,et al.  Characterization of an endogenous gene expressed in Aedes aegypti using an orally infectious recombinant Sindbis virus , 2001 .

[39]  J. Trumble,et al.  Plant allocation to defensive compounds: interactions between elevated CO(2) and nitrogen in transgenic cotton plants. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[40]  M. Afzal,et al.  EFFECT OF SOWING DATES AND PLANT SPACING ON GROWTH AND DRY MATTER PARTITIONING IN COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.) , 2009 .

[41]  Laosheng Wu,et al.  Effects of salinity and nitrogen on cotton growth in arid environment , 2008, Plant and Soil.

[42]  Wei Tang,et al.  Fruiting-branch removal enhances endotoxin expression and lint yield in Bt cotton , 2009 .

[43]  R. Wells,et al.  Response of Ultra–Narrow and Conventional Spaced Cotton to Variable Nitrogen Rates , 2004 .

[44]  R. Keren,et al.  Plant spacing effect on yield of cotton irrigated with saline waters , 1983, Plant and Soil.

[45]  Michael P. Bange,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE ALLOCATION OF COTTON IN RESPONSE TO PLANT AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS , 1997 .

[46]  M. Bange,et al.  Growth and dry matter partitioning of diverse cotton genotypes , 2004 .

[47]  H. Dong,et al.  Variability of Endotoxin Expression in Bt Transgenic Cotton , 2007 .

[48]  I. Rochester.  ARTHROPOD MANAGEMENT Effect of Genotype, Edaphic, Environmental Conditions, and Agronomic Practices on Cry1Ac Protein Expression in Transgenic Cotton , 2006 .

[49]  D. Oosterhuis,et al.  CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHESIS, SPECIFIC LEAF WEIGHT, AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF COTTON UNDER VARYING NITROGEN SUPPLY , 2001 .

[50]  S. Wullschleger,et al.  Canopy development and photosynthesis of cotton as influenced by nitrogen nutrition , 1990 .

[51]  H. Dong,et al.  Effects of Soil Salinity and Plant Density on Yield and Leaf Senescence of Field‐Grown Cotton , 2012 .