Striatum forever, despite sequence learning variability: A random effect analysis of PET data

This PET study is concerned with the what, where, and how of implicit sequence learning. In contrast with previous studies imaging the serial reaction time (SRT) task, the sequence of successive locations was determined by a probabilistic finite‐state grammar. The implicit acquisition of statistical relationships between serially ordered elements (i.e., what) was studied scan by scan, aiming to evidence the brain areas (i.e., where) specifically involved in the implicit processing of this core component of sequential higher‐order knowledge. As behavioural results demonstrate between‐ and within‐subjects variability in the implicit acquisition of sequential knowledge through practice, functional PET data were modelled using a random‐effect model analysis (i.e., how) to account for both sources of behavioural variability. First, two mean condition images were created per subject depending on the presence or not of implicit sequential knowledge at the time of each of the 12 scans. Next, direct comparison of these mean condition images provided the brain areas involved in sequential knowledge processing. Using this approach, we have shown that the striatum is involved in more than simple pairwise associations and that it has the capacity to process higher‐order knowledge. We suggest that the striatum is not only involved in the implicit automatization of serial information through prefrontal cortex‐caudate nucleus networks, but also that it plays a significant role for the selection of the most appropriate responses in the context created by both the current and previous stimuli, thus contributing to better efficiency and faster response preparation in the SRT task. Hum. Brain Mapping 10:179–194, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  G. E. Alexander,et al.  Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  M. Nissen,et al.  Implicit learning in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease , 1987, Neurology.

[4]  E. Reingold,et al.  Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Comparing Direct (Explicit) and Indirect (Implicit) Measures to Study Unconscious Memory , 1991 .

[8]  M. Nissen,et al.  Procedural learning is impaired in Huntington's disease: Evidence from the serial reaction time task , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  S J Pocock,et al.  Repeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  L. Squire Declarative and Nondeclarative Memory: Multiple Brain Systems Supporting Learning and Memory , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Evidence for dissociable motor skills in Huntington’s disease patients , 1993, Psychobiology.

[12]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Implicit Learning , 1993 .

[13]  D. Balota,et al.  Implicit Memory and the Formation of New Associations in Nondemented Parkinson′s Disease Individuals and Individuals with Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type: A Serial Reaction Time (SRT) Investigation , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  M. Hallett,et al.  Procedural learning in Parkinson's disease and cerebellar degeneration , 1993, Annals of neurology.

[15]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[16]  D. Shanks,et al.  Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Implicit learning. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Cognition Unawares. (Book Reviews: Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious.) , 1996 .

[19]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  A PET investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning , 1995 .

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Mapping of Sequence Learning in Normal Humans , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  M. A. Stadler,et al.  Role of attention in implicit learning. , 1995 .

[22]  L. Henderson,et al.  Serial reaction time learning and Parkinson's disease: Evidence for a procedural learning deficit , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Tim Curran,et al.  On The Neural Mechanisms of Sequence Learning , 1995 .

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[25]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning , 1996 .

[26]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Visuomotor Skill Learning in Human Subjects Examined with Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  W Grodd,et al.  Impaired procedural learning after damage to the left supplementary motor area (SMA). , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[28]  J. Doyon,et al.  Role of the Striatum, Cerebellum, and Frontal Lobes in the Learning of a Visuomotor Sequence , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[29]  Daniel S. O'Leary,et al.  Factors That Influence Effect Size in15O PET Studies: A Meta-analytic Review , 1997, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Kutas,et al.  An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[31]  M. Molinari,et al.  Cerebellum and procedural learning: evidence from focal cerebellar lesions. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  S. Rauch,et al.  Striatal recruitment during an implicit sequence learning task as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[33]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Two Forms of Sequential Implicit Learning , 1997, Consciousness and Cognition.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Combining Spatial Extent and Peak Intensity to Test for Activations in Functional Imaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[35]  G. Berns,et al.  Brain regions responsive to novelty in the absence of awareness. , 1997, Science.

[36]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit sequence learning: The truth is in the details , 1998 .

[38]  R. Siegert,et al.  Implicit learning in Parkinson's disease: evidence from a verbal version of the serial reaction time task. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[39]  A. Graybiel The Basal Ganglia and Chunking of Action Repertoires , 1998, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[40]  J. Doyon,et al.  Role of the striatum, cerebellum and frontal lobes in the automatization of a repeated visuomotor sequence of movements , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Effect of focal cerebellar lesions on procedural learning in the serial reaction time task , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Tim Curran,et al.  Implicit sequence learning from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: What, how, and where? , 1998 .

[43]  M. Hallett,et al.  Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Generalisability, Random Effects & Population Inference , 1998, NeuroImage.

[45]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  A Computational Model of How the Basal Ganglia Produce Sequences , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Jüptner,et al.  A review of differences between basal ganglia and cerebellar control of movements as revealed by functional imaging studies. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Role of the human rostral supplementary motor area and the basal ganglia in motor sequence control: investigations with H2 15O PET. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Shanks,et al.  Implicit knowledge in sequential learning tasks , 1998 .

[49]  P. Ashworth,et al.  Handbook of Implicit Learning , 1998 .

[50]  S. Rauch,et al.  Thalamic deactivation during early implicit sequence learning: a functional MRI study , 1998, Neuroreport.

[51]  J. Houk,et al.  Model of cortical-basal ganglionic processing: encoding the serial order of sensory events. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Role of the human rostral supplementary motor area and the basal ganglia in motor sequence control: Investigations with H-2 O-15 PET (vol 79, pg 1070, 1998) , 1998 .

[53]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit learning: news from the front , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Independent Judgment-Linked and Motor-Linked Forms of Artificial Grammar Learning , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[55]  Psyche - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Consciousness , 1999 .

[56]  P. Peigneux,et al.  Exploration of implicit artificial grammar learning in Parkinson's disease. , 1999, Acta neurologica Belgica.

[57]  K. Doya,et al.  Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[58]  L R Squire,et al.  Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.