Synergies in Strategic Alliances: Motivation and Outcomes of Complementary and Synergistic Knowledge Networks

This paper aims at contributing to the research concerning alliance dynamics by combining elements from research considering motives for alliance formation and alliance outcomes. This paper draws on the resource-based view of the firm, suggesting that firms’ competitive advantages derive from their preferential access to idiosyncratic resources, especially tacit knowledge-related (based) resources. However, by integrating the resource-based view into the network perspective, the main arguments focus on the relationship between conditions for alliance formation and outcomes and the impact of learning on the dynamic evolution of alliances. The paper breaks with the traditional assumption of complementarity of resources (or resource-bases) as a necessity for successful collaboration, and proposes a different and more dynamic approach to alliance formation in the pursuit of what seems to be the ultimate goal of strategic alliances: Synergy. Ultimately, this paper identifies two different types of knowledge networks: Complementary Knowledge Networks and Synergistic Knowledge Networks, which, depending on the initial motivation and conditions, will lead to different outcomes in terms of learning and knowledge creation for the partners.

[1]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[2]  C. Oliver.  Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[3]  J. Hennart,et al.  Trojan horse or work horse? The evolution of U.S.-Japanese joint ventures in the United States , 1999 .

[4]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[5]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[6]  M. Polanyi.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[7]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[8]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia , 2000 .

[9]  J. Hennart,et al.  A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures , 1988 .

[10]  K. R. Harrigan.  Strategies for joint ventures , 1985 .

[11]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[12]  S. Park,et al.  When competition eclipses cooperation: an event history analysis of joint venture failure , 1996 .

[13]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[14]  C. Barnard.  The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .

[15]  S. Balakrishnan,et al.  Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures* Theory and evidence , 1993 .

[16]  B. Kogut.  The Stability of Joint Ventures: Reciprocity and Competitive Rivalry , 1989 .

[17]  B. Kogut.  Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[18]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[20]  W. Mitchell,et al.  SURVIVAL OF BUSINESSES USING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS TO COMMERCIALIZE COMPLEX GOODS , 1996 .

[21]  L. L. Blodgett.  Factors in the instability of international joint ventures : an event history analysis , 1992 .

[22]  Bernard Garrette,et al.  Determinants of Success in International Strategic Alliances: Evidence from the Global Aerospace Industry , 1995 .

[23]  O. Williamson,et al.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[24]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[27]  O. Williamson.  / STRATEGIZING, ECONOMIZING, AND ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION , 1991 .

[28]  Arvind Parkhe.  Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation , 1993 .

[29]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[30]  W. Bean.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy , 1961 .

[31]  M. Crossan.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[32]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships , 1998 .

[33]  Mariko Sakakibara,et al.  HETEROGENEITY OF FIRM CAPABILITIES AND COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF MOTIVES , 1997 .

[34]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[35]  C. Argyris.  Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. , 1976 .

[36]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[37]  B. Borys,et al.  Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations , 1989 .

[38]  David Lei,et al.  Global Strategy, Competence-Building and Strategic Alliances , 1992 .

[39]  A. Lewin,et al.  The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[40]  Bernard Yeung,et al.  An empirical investigation of joint venture dynamics: Evidence from U.S.-Japan joint ventures , 1996 .

[41]  K. R. Conner.  A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[42]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link , 1990 .

[43]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[44]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Joint Venture Partner Selection: Strategies for Developed Countries , 1988 .