The Hidden Dilemmas in Software Development Project Decisionmaking: Persist or Desist?

Given that decision makers continue to face dilemmas on whether to persist or desist with troubled projects, it is important for senior managers to support the assessment of decision dilemmas faced by project managers. By drawing on two case studies that exhibit project escalation situation, decision-makers in both cases were interviewed and important documents reviewed, the paper has identified five types of decision dilemmas and their associated characteristics: justification, sunk cost, ambiguity, opportunity cost and completion . The decision dilemmas identified in this study and the recommendations for countering these dilemmas aim to help project managers improve the process of decision-making during project development. Furthermore, it is also important for organizations to be aware of the role played by decision dilemmas within the escalation phenomenon as such understanding could help organizations extricate themselves from future escalation predicaments.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[2]  H. Raiffa,et al.  The hidden traps in decision making. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[3]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Escalation and de‐escalation of commitment: a commitment transformation analysis of an e‐government project , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[4]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Commitment to a Policy Decision: A Multi-Theoretical Perspective. , 1978 .

[5]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[7]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Escalating commitment to information system projects: findings from two simulated experiments , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Factors affecting withdrawal from an escalating conflict: Quitting before it's too late , 1979 .

[9]  F. Glen.  The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[10]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  The Role of Project Completion Information in Resource Allocation Decisions , 1993 .

[11]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[13]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[14]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions , 1986 .

[15]  Mark Keil,et al.  Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  J. Brockner.  The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress , 1992 .

[17]  Gregory Rowe,et al.  Escalation in Decision Making: The Tragedy of Taurus , 1997 .

[18]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  De-escalating Information Technology Projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport , 2000, MIS Q..

[19]  Michael G. Bowen.  The Escalation Phenomenon Reconsidered: Decision Dilemmas or Decision Errors? , 1987 .

[20]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects , 2000, MIS Q..

[21]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment to a Course of Action: A Reinterpretation , 1986 .

[22]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..