Precision of estimating individual feed intake of grazing animals offered low, declining pasture availability1

Measurement of intake of individual grazing animals remains one of the fundamental challenges to improving efficiency of livestock production. The use of wireless sensor networks (WSN) shows potential for this purpose and requires benchmark data to underpin the necessary algorithm development. This study aimed to provide benchmark data and enable improved precision in estimating pasture intake when pasture availability is low and declining. Each of 10 Angus steers with a mean liveweight ± s.d. of 326 ± 46 kg was randomly allocated to an individual grazing plot. The plots comprised a monoculture of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum cv. Surge), with estimated initial pasture biomass availability ≤1100 kg DM/ha, provided at three levels of pasture availability (low, medium and high), achieved by varying plot sizes (0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 ha). Pasture intake was estimated using two pasture disappearance-based techniques (rising-plate meter and capacitance meter) using regression equations of daily pasture biomass estimates over an 11-day pasture intake period, and two chemical marker-based techniques (dosed n-alkanes and chromic oxide). Both pasture disappearance-based techniques showed high variability in estimating pasture biomass, with mean coefficients of variation between repeated-measurements of 28% for the capacitance meter and 44% for the plate meter, although daily biomass measurements over the duration of the study using the two devices were highly correlated (r = 0.82). Mean pasture intake estimates across all four techniques ranged from 3.4 to 10.7 kg DM/day. The estimates of pasture intake differed between techniques but not between biomass availability treatments. Mean of pasture intake estimates made using the plate meter were consistently higher than for the other three techniques. The correlation coefficients between the intake estimates determined using the pasture disappearance-based techniques, and between their rankings, were 0.61 and 0.58, respectively. Intake estimates obtained using pasture disappearance and the chemical marker methods were not correlated apart from between chromic oxide and the plate meter (r = 0.51). Further refinement of these techniques and more studies over a wider range of pasture conditions are needed. It is critical to understand the limits within which each of the pasture intake methodologies will produce reliable results that can then be used as benchmark data for the development of predictive algorithms using WSN.

[1]  S. Korver.  Genetic aspects of feed intake and feed efficiency in dairy cattle: A review , 1988 .

[2]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  How wireless will change agriculture. , 2007 .

[3]  Assessment of seasonal dry‐matter yield and quality of grass swards with imaging spectroscopy , 2003 .

[4]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Animal Behaviour Understanding using Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, Proceedings. 2006 31st IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[5]  Leslie Overs,et al.  New ways of measuring intake, efficiency and behaviour of grazing livestock , 2014 .

[6]  Isaías López-Guerrero,et al.  Comparaciones entre cuatro métodos de estimación de biomasa en praderas de festuca alta , 2011 .

[7]  P. O. Currie,et al.  USES AND CAPABILITIES OF ELECTRONIC CAPACITANCE INSTRUMENTS FOR ESTIMATING STANDING HERBAGE , 1973 .

[8]  R. Jones,et al.  Limitations of the electronic capacitance meter in measuring yields of grazed tropical pastures , 1977 .

[9]  Shakib Shahidian,et al.  Calibration of a capacitance probe for measurement and mapping of dry matter yield in Mediterranean pastures , 2011, Precision Agriculture.

[10]  A. Tegegne,et al.  Feed intake and production parameters of lactating crossbred cows fed maize-based diets of stover, silage or quality protein silage , 2010, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[11]  Jeffrey S. Fehmi,et al.  A plate meter inadequately estimated herbage mass in a semi-arid grassland. , 2009 .

[12]  D. Minson.  Predicting feed intake of food-producing animals , 1988 .

[13]  Distinguishing Cattle Foraging Activities Using an Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitor , 2013 .

[14]  G. Hinch,et al.  Grazing behaviour and pattern of intake of dairy cows grazing kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) grass pastures in relation to sward height and length of grazing session , 2009 .

[15]  D H Crews,et al.  Test duration for growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency in beef cattle using the GrowSafe System. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[16]  D. Krauss,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic relationships among different measures of growth and feed efficiency in young Charolais bulls , 2001 .

[17]  H. Norman,et al.  Triennial Lactation Symposium: Opportunities for improving milk production efficiency in dairy cattle. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[18]  K. Osoro,et al.  Accuracy of the n-alkane technique for intake estimates in beef cattle using different sampling procedures and feeding levels , 2007 .

[19]  J. Werf,et al.  Genetic aspects of feed intake and efficiency in dairy cows. , 1991 .

[20]  J. Tanner,et al.  Botanical and nutritional composition of maize stover, intakes and feed selection by dairy cattle , 2001 .

[21]  Rex D. Fernando,et al.  Genetic parameters for energy balance, feed efficiency, and related traits in Holstein cattle. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  R. Kellaway,et al.  A comparison of three techniques to determine the herbage intake of dairy cows grazing kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pasture , 1996 .

[23]  Jeffrey Rushen,et al.  Automated monitoring of behavioural-based animal welfare indicators , 2012 .

[24]  D. Stilmant,et al.  Factors affecting intake by grazing ruminants and related quantification methods: a review , 2009 .

[25]  Dj Cottle,et al.  The trials and tribulations of estimating the pasture intake of grazing animals , 2013 .

[26]  P. Costigan,et al.  Analysis of faecal chromium derived from controlled release marker devices , 1987 .

[27]  S. Coleman.  Predicting Forage Intake by Grazing Ruminants , 2005 .

[28]  R. Sandland,et al.  Estimation of herbage consumption by grazing cattle using measurements of eating behaviour , 1976 .

[29]  G. Sunvold,et al.  Technical note: evaluation of acid detergent lignin, alkaline peroxide lignin, acid insoluble ash, and indigestible acid detergent fiber as internal markers for prediction of alfalfa, bromegrass, and prairie hay digestibility by beef steers. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[30]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Intake regulation and grazing behavior of dairy cows under continuous stocking. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  Paul L. Greenwood,et al.  Consequences of nutrition during gestation, and the challenge to better understand and enhance livestock productivity and efficiency in pastoral ecosystems , 2014 .

[32]  K. Osoro,et al.  Estimation of feed intake by cattle using controlled-release capsules containing n-alkanes or chromium sesquioxide , 2004, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[33]  Df Earle,et al.  Evaluation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pasture , 1979 .

[34]  J. Fike,et al.  Comparison of three techniques for estimating the forage intake of lactating dairy cows on pasture. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[35]  C Bisaglia,et al.  Methodology for quantifying the behavioral activity of dairy cows in freestall barns. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[36]  H. Dove,et al.  Protocol for the analysis of n-alkanes and other plant-wax compounds and for their use as markers for quantifying the nutrient supply of large mammalian herbivores , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[37]  C. V. Van Tassell,et al.  Use of residual feed intake in Holsteins during early lactation shows potential to improve feed efficiency through genetic selection. , 2013, Journal of animal science.