Perceiving age and gender in unfamiliar faces: brain potential evidence for implicit and explicit person categorization.

We used repetition priming to investigate implicit and explicit processes of unfamiliar face categorization. During prime and test phases, participants categorized unfamiliar faces according to either age or gender. Faces presented at test were either new or primed in a task-congruent (same task during priming and test) or incongruent (different tasks) condition. During age categorization, reaction times revealed significant priming for both priming conditions, and event-related potentials yielded an increased N170 over the left hemisphere as a result of priming. During gender categorization, congruent faces elicited priming and a latency decrease in the right N170. Accordingly, information about age is extracted irrespective of processing demands, and priming facilitates the extraction of feature information reflected in the left N170 effect. By contrast, priming of gender categorization may depend on whether the task at initial presentation requires configural processing.

[1]  M. Eimer.  ATTENTIONAL MODULATIONS OF EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS SENSITIVE TO FACES , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[2]  H Begleiter,et al.  Event-related brain potentials differentiate priming and recognition to familiar and unfamiliar faces. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Giard,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Age and Gender Perception on Human Faces , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. , 1995 .

[6]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  How Does the Brain Discriminate Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces?: A PET Study of Face Categorical Perception , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[9]  T. Shallice,et al.  Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. , 2000, Science.

[10]  Laurence Rousselle,et al.  Exploring the functional architecture of person recognition system with event-related potentials in a within- and cross-domain self-priming of faces , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  David J. Turk,et al.  Seeing John Malkovich: the neural substrates of person categorization , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. Young,et al.  Repetition Priming and Face Processing: Priming Occurs within the System that Responds to the Identity of a Face , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Face processing stages: Impact of difficulty and the separation of effects , 2006, Brain Research.

[14]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[15]  C Neil Macrae,et al.  Categorizing others: the dynamics of person construal. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[17]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  The effects of immediate stimulus repetition on reaction time and event-related potentials in tasks of different complexity , 1994 .

[18]  H L Roediger,et al.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[19]  R A Johnston,et al.  Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. , 1990, British journal of psychology.

[20]  M. Kiefer.  The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[22]  Stefan R. Schweinberger,et al.  HOW GORBACHEV PRIMED YELTSIN : ANALYSES OF ASSOCIATIVE PRIMING IN PERSON RECOGNITION BY MEANS OF REACTION TIMES AND EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS , 1996 .

[23]  A. Burton,et al.  Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Top-down modulation of unconscious 'automatic'processes: A gating framework , 2007 .

[25]  P Berg,et al.  A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  D. Perrett,et al.  What Gives a Face its Gender? , 1993, Perception.

[28]  M. Eimer.  Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  Denise C. Park,et al.  A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[30]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  D. Levin.  CLASSIFYING FACES BY RACE : THE STRUCTURE OF FACE CATEGORIES , 1996 .

[32]  G. Hole,et al.  The role of spatial and surface cues in the age-processing of unfamiliar faces , 2000 .

[33]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: an event-related potential study , 2008, Neuroreport.

[34]  A. Burton,et al.  N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions , 2004, Neuroreport.

[35]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: an event-related brain potentials study. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[36]  Stefan R. Schweinberger,et al.  Covert Recognition and the Neural System for Face Processing , 2003, Cortex.

[37]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[38]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of faces , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  M. Eimer.  Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  F. Mast,et al.  Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2008, Neuroreport.

[41]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity , 2007 .

[43]  Peter J. B. Hancock,et al.  From Pixels to People: A Model of Familiar Face Recognition , 1999 .

[44]  D. Levin.  Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  N200, N250r, and N400 event-related brain potentials reveal three loci of repetition priming for familiar names. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  N. Sagiv,et al.  Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-Based Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Memory systems for structural and semantic knowledge of faces and buildings , 2006, Brain Research.

[49]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  C. Nelson,et al.  Featural and Configural Face Processing in Adults and Infants: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Investigation , 2006, Perception.

[51]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Long-term effects of covert face recognition , 2002, Cognition.

[52]  Luigi Castelli,et al.  On the Activation of Social Stereotypes: The Moderating Role of Processing Objectives , 1997 .

[53]  T. Ito,et al.  The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perception , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[54]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[55]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[56]  Holger Wiese,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of repetition priming for ignored faces , 2007, Neuroreport.

[57]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Age-related slowing in face and name recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[58]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  A comparison of the electrophysiological effects of formal and repetition priming. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[59]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  T. Ito,et al.  Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Repetition-priming Modulates Category-related Effects on Event-related Potentials: Further Evidence for Multiple Cortical Semantic Systems , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  Y. Goshen-Gottstein,et al.  Repetition priming for familiar and unfamiliar faces in a sex-judgment task: evidence for a common route for the processing of sex and identity. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  A. M. Burton,et al.  Sex Discrimination: How Do We Tell the Difference between Male and Female Faces? , 1993, Perception.