Toward A Reliable Network Design: A QoS Mapping Framework

No doubt that the information technology field is filled with various qualitative and quantitative concepts that are used to describe the desired performance for the network user or designer. The most common performance indicator concept is the reliability concept. Based on analyzing this concept in an IP network environment, the reliability concept is further expressed by the quality of service (QoS). Any regular network user definitely cares about the reliability of the services he perceives. This reliability in fact depends on the reliability of the underlying network. Therefore, the upper layer subjective requirements need to be transparently translated into lower layer objective ones. This paper presents a systematic framework for mapping the lower-layer network QoS performance parameter embodied by the packet loss rate into the upper-layer application QoS in an objective quantifiable way. In fact, currently with the advanced highspeed networks, the focus of the IP network performance is shifting from scalability, throughput and utilization benchmarks to guaranteeing loss bounds for different applications and users. Thus, this mapping will surely allow better and reliable system design and understanding of the technical network parameters from the application's perspective of the service level agreement (SLA).

[1]  Alan Clark Telchemy Incorporated Title: Packet Loss Distributions and Packet Loss Models , 2003 .

[2]  N. Kyriakopoulos,et al.  Network Dependability, Fault-tolerance, Reliability, Security, Survivability: A Framework for Comparative Analysis , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems.

[3]  Klaus Jobmann,et al.  Policy-based quality of service mapping in distributed systems , 2002, NOMS 2002. IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium. ' Management Solutions for the New Communications World'(Cat. No.02CH37327).

[4]  Hanoch Levy,et al.  The effect of packet dispersion on voice applications in IP networks , 2006, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw..

[5]  Yoshihiro Ito,et al.  Quantitative assessment of user-level QoS and its mapping , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[6]  Qiang Wang,et al.  An inter-application and inter-client priority-based QoS proxy architecture for heterogeneous networks , 2005, 10th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC'05).

[7]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Choosing an Accurate Network Model using Domain Analysis , 2005, 11th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS'05).

[8]  Lingfen Sun,et al.  Subjective and Objective Speech Quality Evaluation under Bursty Losses , 2002 .

[9]  Wenyu Jiang,et al.  Modeling of Packet Loss and Delay and Their Effect on Real-Time Multimedia Service Quality , 2000 .

[10]  Klara Nahrstedt,et al.  The QOS Broker , 1995, IEEE Multim..

[11]  Jean-François Huard,et al.  On QOS mapping in multimedia networks , 1997, Proceedings Twenty-First Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'97).

[12]  Neal Seitz ITU-T QoS standards for IP-based networks , 2003, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[13]  Luiz A. DaSilva,et al.  QoS mapping along the protocol stack: discussion and preliminary results , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Communications. ICC 2000. Global Convergence Through Communications. Conference Record.

[14]  Norihisa Doi,et al.  Effects of IP packet loss and picture frame reduction on MPEG1 subjective quality , 1999, 1999 IEEE Third Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (Cat. No.99TH8451).