Toward an integrative science of the person.

To build a science of the person, the most basic question was, and remains, how can one identify and understand the psychological invariance that distinctively characterizes an individual and that underlies the variations in the thoughts, feelings, and actions that occur across contexts and over time? This question proved particularly difficult because of the discrepancies that soon emerged between the expressions of consistency that were expected and those that were found. The resulting dilemma became known as the classic "personality paradox": How can we reconcile our intuitions-and theories-about the invariance and stability of personality with the equally compelling empirical evidence for the variability of the person's behavior across diverse situations? Which is right: the intuitions or the research findings? In this chapter I review and discuss some of the advances made to answer this question since it was posed. These findings have allowed a resolution of the paradox, and provide the outlines for a conception of the underlying structure and dynamics of personality that seems to better account for the data.

[1]  G. Downey,et al.  Rejection sensitivity and male violence in romantic relationships , 2000 .

[2]  G. Downey,et al.  Attentional Mechanisms Linking Rejection to Hostile Reactivity: The Role of “Hot” Versus “Cool” Focus , 2002, Psychological science.

[3]  Stephen J. Read,et al.  On the dynamic construction of meaning: An interactive activation and competition model of social perception. , 1998 .

[4]  B. Krahé,et al.  Situation Cognition and Coherence in Personality: An Individual-Centred Approach , 1990 .

[5]  Daniel Cervone,et al.  Advances in personality science. , 2002 .

[6]  W. Mischel,et al.  Situation-Behavior Profiles as a Locus of Consistency in Personality , 2002 .

[7]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[8]  D. Derryberry.  Attention and Voluntary Self-Control , 2002 .

[9]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations , 2003 .

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  Developing mechanisms of self-regulation , 2000, Development and Psychopathology.

[11]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  Pattern and growth in personality , 1961 .

[12]  Y Shoda,et al.  The role of situational demands and cognitive competencies in behavior organization and personality coherence. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  C. Morf,et al.  Expanding the Dynamic Self-Regulatory Processing Model of Narcissism: Research Directions for the Future , 2001 .

[14]  D. Peterson.  The clinical study of social behavior , 1968 .

[15]  W. Mischel,et al.  Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: a multimethod approach. , 2001 .

[17]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[18]  W. Mischel,et al.  Conditional hedges and the intuitive psychology of traits. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  W. Mischel,et al.  Intuitive interactionism in person perception: effects of situation--behavior relations on dispositional judgments. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  W. Mischel,et al.  Person X situation interactionism in self-encoding (I am...when...): implications for affect regulation and social information processing. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  A Distributed Memory Model of Averaging Phenomena in Person Impression Formation , 1994 .

[22]  P. Vernon,et al.  Personality Assessment: A Critical Survey , 1965 .

[23]  W. Mischel,et al.  Links Between Personality Judgments and Contextualized Behavior Patterns: Situation-Behavior Profiles of Personality Prototypes , 1993 .

[24]  Serena Chen,et al.  The relational self: an interpersonal social-cognitive theory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[25]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  Behavior and development as a function of the total situation. , 1946 .

[26]  Lawrence A. Pervin,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Current Trait Theory , 1994 .

[27]  L. Cronbach.  The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[28]  G. Downey,et al.  Sensitivity to Status-Based Rejection: Implications for African American Students' College Experience , 2002 .

[29]  D. Bem,et al.  Constructing a theory of the triple typology: Some (second) thoughts on nomothetic and idiographic approaches to personality. , 1983, Journal of personality.

[30]  D. Moskowitz.  Coherence and cross-situational generality in personality: A new analysis of old problems. , 1982 .

[31]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research. , 1980 .

[32]  W. Fleeson.  Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: traits as density distribution of states. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Y. Shoda.  Individual differences in social psychology , 2004 .

[34]  G. Downey,et al.  Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the impact of childhood exposure to family violence on adult attachment behavior , 1994, Development and Psychopathology.

[35]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[36]  W. Mischel.  Personality and Assessment , 1996 .

[37]  G. Miller.  On knowing a word. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  C. Chiu,et al.  Discriminative facility in social competence : conditional versus dispositional encoding and monitoring-blunting of information , 1995 .

[39]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Social Cognition: Making Sense of People , 1999 .

[40]  Walter Mischel,et al.  The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: A meta-perspective on a century of the self in psychology. , 2003 .

[41]  G. Downey,et al.  Does rejection elicit hostility in rejection sensitive women , 1999 .

[42]  W. Mischel,et al.  A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Cecilia Cheng.  Cognitive and motivational processes underlying coping flexibility: a dual-process model. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  W. Mischel,et al.  Delay of gratification in children. , 1989, Science.

[45]  Anita Sethi,et al.  The role of strategic attention deployment in development of self-regulation: predicting preschoolers' delay of gratification from mother-toddler interactions. , 2000 .

[46]  W. Mischel,et al.  The personality of familiar and significant people: the lay perceiver as a social-cognitive theorist. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  D. Moskowitz.  Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. , 1994 .

[48]  Scott LeeTiernan,et al.  Personality as a Dynamical System: Emergence of Stability and Distinctiveness from Intra and Interpersonal Interactions , 2002 .

[49]  Walter Mischel,et al.  Introduction to personality : toward an integration , 2004 .

[50]  Y. Shoda,et al.  Perceiving individuals and groups as coherent: How do perceivers make sense of variable behavior? , 2003 .

[51]  R. Shweder.  Humans Really Are Different , 1999, Science.

[52]  Y Shoda,et al.  Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[53]  P. Thagard,et al.  FORMING IMPRESSIONS FROM STEREOTYPES, TRAITS, AND BEHAVIORS : A PARALLEL-CONSTRAINT-SATISFACTION THEORY , 1996 .

[54]  Y. Trope.  Identification and Inferential Processes in Dispositional Attribution. , 1986 .

[55]  R. Vonk,et al.  The slime effect : Suspicion and dislike of likeable behavior toward superiors , 1998 .

[56]  G. Downey,et al.  Regulating the Interpersonal Self: Strategic Self-Regulation for Coping With Rejection Sensitivity , 2000 .

[57]  E. Higgins.  Personality, social psychology, and person-situation relations: Standards and knowledge activation as a common language. , 1990 .

[58]  Vivian Zayas,et al.  Personality in context: an interpersonal systems perspective. , 2002, Journal of personality.

[59]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. , 1979 .

[60]  W. Mischel,et al.  Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology , 2000 .

[61]  J. Kagan.  Biology, context, and developmental inquiry. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[62]  J. B. Maller,et al.  Studies in the Nature of Character. , 1930 .

[63]  W. Mischel,et al.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. , 1995, Psychological review.

[64]  D. Cervone,et al.  The architecture of personality. , 2004, Psychological review.

[65]  I. Mechelen,et al.  Individual differences in situation-behavior profiles: A triple typology model , 1998 .

[66]  W. Mischel.  Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. , 1973, Psychological review.

[67]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. , 1999, Psychological review.

[68]  John F. Kihlstrom,et al.  Personality and social intelligence , 1987 .

[69]  Nancy Cantor,et al.  A prototype analysis of psychological situations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[70]  Joseph E LeDoux.  The emotional brain , 1996 .

[71]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Rethinking Feelings: An fMRI Study of the Cognitive Regulation of Emotion , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[72]  Serena Chen.  Psychological-State Theories about Significant Others: Implications for the Content and Structure of Significant-Other Representations , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[73]  G. Āllport.  Personality: A Psychological Interpretation , 1938 .