Semi-automated segmentation of pre-operative low grade gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging

BackgroundSegmentation of pre-operative low-grade gliomas (LGGs) from magnetic resonance imaging is a crucial step for studying imaging biomarkers. However, segmentation of LGGs is particularly challenging because they rarely enhance after gadolinium administration. Like other gliomas, they have irregular tumor shape, heterogeneous composition, ill-defined tumor boundaries, and limited number of image types. To overcome these challenges we propose a semi-automated segmentation method that relies only on T2-weighted (T2W) and optionally post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) images.MethodsFirst, the user draws a region-of-interest (ROI) that completely encloses the tumor and some normal tissue. Second, a normal brain atlas and post-contrast T1W images are registered to T2W images. Third, the posterior probability of each pixel/voxel belonging to normal and abnormal tissues is calculated based on information derived from the atlas and ROI. Finally, geodesic active contours use the probability map of the tumor to shrink the ROI until optimal tumor boundaries are found. This method was validated against the true segmentation (TS) of 30 LGG patients for both 2D (1 slice) and 3D. The TS was obtained from manual segmentations of three experts using the Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) software. Dice and Jaccard indices and other descriptive statistics were computed for the proposed method, as well as the experts’ segmentation versus the TS. We also tested the method with the BraTS datasets, which supply expert segmentations.Results and discussionFor 2D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.90 ± 0.06 (standard deviation), sensitivity was 0.92, and specificity was 0.99. For 3D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.89 ± 0.06, sensitivity was 0.91, and specificity was 0.99. The automated results are comparable with the experts’ manual segmentation results.ConclusionsWe present an accurate, robust, efficient, and reproducible segmentation method for pre-operative LGGs.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[2]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  The New WHO Classification of Brain Tumours , 1993, Brain pathology.

[3]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Automated segmentation of MR images of brain tumors. , 2001, Radiology.

[4]  David R. Haynor,et al.  Nonrigid multimodality image registration , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2002 , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Automatic Brain and Tumor Segmentation , 2002, MICCAI.

[7]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Level-set evolution with region competition: automatic 3-D segmentation of brain tumors , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[8]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Automatic brain tumor segmentation by subject specific modification of atlas priors. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[9]  I. Whittle,et al.  The dilemma of low grade glioma , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[10]  Guido Gerig,et al.  A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  L. D.,et al.  Brain tumors , 2005, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[13]  S. Cha,et al.  Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  Efficient Multilevel Brain Tumor Segmentation With Integrated Bayesian Model Classification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention − MICCAI 2017: 20th International Conference, Quebec City, QC, Canada, September 11-13, 2017, Proceedings, Part II , 2017, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[16]  Gözde B. Ünal,et al.  Cellular Automata Segmentation of Brain Tumors on Post Contrast MR Images , 2010, MICCAI.

[17]  Adolf Pfefferbaum,et al.  The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain structure , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  A Generative Model for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Multi-Modal Images , 2010, MICCAI.

[19]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  Molecular diagnostics of gliomas: state of the art , 2010, Acta Neuropathologica.

[20]  Stefan Bauer,et al.  Fully Automatic Segmentation of Brain Tumor Images Using Support Vector Machine Classification in Combination with Hierarchical Conditional Random Field Regularization , 2011, MICCAI.

[21]  Rasoul Khayati,et al.  Fully automated tumor segmentation based on improved fuzzy connectedness algorithm in brain MR images , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[22]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  A novel content-based active contour model for brain tumor segmentation. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Semi-automatic segmentation software for quantitative clinical brain glioblastoma evaluation. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[24]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Decision Forests for Tissue-Specific Segmentation of High-Grade Gliomas in Multi-channel MR , 2012, MICCAI.

[25]  S. Bauer,et al.  A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Luis Álvarez,et al.  A Morphological Approach to Curvature-Based Evolution of Curves and Surfaces , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[27]  J. Gee,et al.  The Insight ToolKit image registration framework , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[28]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.