Implementing the competences-based students-centered learning approach in Architectural Design Education: The case of the T MEDA Pilot Architectural Program at the Hashemite University (Jordan)

Higher educational systems become increasingly oriented towards the competences-based student-centered learning and outcome approach. Worldwide, these systems are focusing on the students as a whole: focusing on their dimensional, intellectual, professional, psychological, moral, and spiritual. This research was conducted in an attempt to answer the main research question: how can the architectural design courses be designed based on the required competences and how can the teaching, learning activities and assessment methods be structured and aligned in order to allow students to achieve and reach the intended learning outcomes? This research used a case study driven best practice research method to answer the research questions based on the T MEDA pilot architectural program that was implemented at the Hashemite University, Jordan. This research found that it is important for architectural education to adapt the students-centered learning method. Such approach increases the effectiveness of teaching and learning methods, enhances the design studio environment, and focuses on students’ engagement to develop their design process and product. Moreover, this research found that using different assessment methods in architectural design courses help students to develop their learning outcomes; and inform teachers about the effectiveness of their teaching process. Furthermore, the involvement of students in assessment produces effective learning and enhances their design motivation. However, applying competences-based students-centered learning and outcome approach needs more time and staff to apply. Another problem is that some instructors resist changing to the new methods or approaches because they prefer to use their old and traditional systems. The application for this method at the first time needs intensive recourses, more time, and good cooperation between different instructors and course coordinator. However, within the time this method will be more useful and interesting for the teacher and more effective and formative for students. Finally, the development of architectural academic staff is needed to increase awareness of learning needs of all architectural students. This requires redesigning and aligning their curriculum and courses syllabus according to the requirements of new methods.

[1]  Joanna C. Richards,et al.  Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design , 2013 .

[2]  Whakapakari Ako Assessment Matters: Self-Assessment & Peer Assessment , 2014 .

[3]  Pamela Baxter,et al.  Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers , 2008 .

[4]  Laura Arnau-Sabatés,et al.  Learning basic employability competence: a challenge for the active labour insertion of adolescents in residential care in their transition to adulthood , 2014 .

[5]  Is Outcomes Assessment Hurting Higher Education , 2008 .

[6]  Donna M. Zucker,et al.  How to Do Case Study Research , 2009 .

[7]  Peter Knight,et al.  Summative Assessment in Higher Education: Practices in disarray , 2002 .

[8]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  How do you know they are learning? The importance of alignment in higher education , 2006, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[9]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  The case study approach , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[10]  S. Bloxham,et al.  Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education: A Practical Guide , 2007 .

[11]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  How learning works , 2010 .

[12]  Cosmas Maphosa,et al.  Exploring the Assessment Terrain in Higher Education: Possibilities and Threats: A Concept Paper , 2013 .

[13]  Victoria Millar,et al.  Writing learning outcomes. A practical guide for academics. , 2015 .

[14]  Aurelio Villa Sánchez,et al.  Competence-based learning: a proposal for the assessment of generic competences , 2008 .

[15]  Richard Hall Aligning learning, teaching and assessment using the web: an evaluation of pedagogic approaches , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[16]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[17]  Carol L. Colbeck,et al.  Developing Performance Indicators for Assessing Classroom Teaching Practices and Student Learning , 2001 .

[18]  John J. Doherty,et al.  Design to learn, learn to design: Using backward design for information literacy instruction , 2012 .

[19]  Filip Dochy,et al.  Students’ Perceptions about New Modes of Assessment in Higher Education: A Review , 2003 .

[20]  D. Boud,et al.  Peer Learning and Assessment , 1999 .

[21]  J. Kessels,et al.  A relational approach to curriculum design , 1999 .

[22]  D. Boud,et al.  Assessment 2020. Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education , 2010 .