Adaptive Contact Strategies in Telephone and Face-to-Face Surveys

In attempting to contact households for a survey, it is necessary to determine the timing of each call. Often, average "best" times to call are used in order to determine when to place the first call(s). The timing of subsequent calls is then governed by very general rules. This paper tests an experimental method that uses multi-level models to predict the times that have the highest probability of contact for each household and uses the predictions from these models to prioritize cases for calling. The predictions are updated each day in real-time as additional data are gathered. The method is evaluated through a series of experiments on a telephone survey that used automated call scheduling and an experiment on a face-to-face survey, where a recommended calling time was delivered to interviewers. The results of these experiments are used to suggest directions for future research.

[1]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Adaptive Preventive Interventions , 2004, Prevention Science.

[2]  R. E. Folsom,et al.  Optimal Times to Contact Sample Households , 1980 .

[3]  Ree Dawson,et al.  Adaptive treatment strategies in chronic disease. , 2008, Annual review of medicine.

[4]  Gabriele B. Durrant,et al.  Multilevel modelling of refusal and non‐contact in household surveys: evidence from six UK Government surveys , 2009 .

[5]  S. Murphy,et al.  Optimal dynamic treatment regimes , 2003 .

[6]  Susan Purdon,et al.  Interviewer's calling strategies on face-to-face interview surveys , 1999 .

[7]  G. Loosveldt,et al.  A Multilevel Multinomial Analysis of Interviewer Effects on Various Components of Unit Nonresponse , 2002 .

[8]  H. Sung,et al.  Evaluating multiple treatment courses in clinical trials. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  Richard A. Kulka,et al.  Toward the development of optimal calling protocols for telephone surveys: a conditional probabilities approach , 1988 .

[10]  S. Nair,et al.  Improving Right Party Contact Rates at Outbound Call Centers , 2010 .

[11]  Susan Purdon,et al.  Can you hear me knocking? and investigation into the impact of interviewers on survey response rates , 1997 .

[12]  Achim Koch,et al.  Improving Survey Response: Lessons Learned from the European Social Survey , 2010 .

[13]  K. Olson,et al.  Where Do Interviewers Go When They Do What They Do? An Analysis of Interviewer Travel in Two Field Surveys , 2011 .

[14]  Heather Laurie,et al.  Strategies for reducing nonresponse in a longitudinal panel survey , 1999 .

[15]  T. Johnson,et al.  Using Community-Level Correlates to Evaluate Nonresponse Effects in a Telephone Survey , 2006 .

[16]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[17]  Gabriele B. Durrant,et al.  Using paradata to predict best times of contact, conditioning on household and interviewer influences , 2011 .

[18]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing , 1996 .

[19]  P. Cunningham.  OUTCOMES OF A CALLING PROTOCOL IN A TELEPHONE SURVEY , 2002 .

[20]  Oliver Lipps.  A Note on Improving Contact Times in Panel Surveys , 2012 .

[21]  James Wagner,et al.  Adaptive survey design to reduce nonresponse bias , 2008 .

[22]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Nonresponse In Household Interview Surveys , 1998 .

[23]  S. Murphy,et al.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Richard A. Kulka,et al.  OPTIMAL CALL SCHEDULING FOR A TELEPHONE SURVEY , 1987 .

[25]  Stanley Presser,et al.  Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century , 2005 .