Contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in peripheral arterial disease: Improving image quality by automated image registration

In peripheral arterial disease, contrast‐enhanced MR angiography (MRA) is a noninvasive imaging alternative for catheter‐based digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In DSA, final images are generated by subtracting a native mask image from subsequent contrast‐enhanced images. Image quality is routinely improved by digitally shifting the mask image prior to subtraction if the patient has moved during angiography. This study investigated whether such image registration may also help to improve the image quality of MRA. In all, 545 MRA examinations of pelvic and leg arteries in patients with symptoms of peripheral arterial disease were studied retrospectively. Standard nonregistered MRA was compared to automatically linear, affine, and warp registered MRA by visual analysis and by three image quality parameters, including vessel detection probability (VDP) of angiographic maximum intensity projections. Most MRA of pelvic and upper leg arteries showed good nonregistered image quality. However, the 15% of lower legs with a body shift of 1 mm or more had relatively low nonregistered image quality, which improved significantly with image registration (VDP gain more than 18%, P < 0.05). The visual analysis gave similar results. In conclusion, image registration can improve image quality of MRA in peripheral arterial disease, especially in the lower legs. Magn Reson Med 60:224–229, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  E. Sueyoshi,et al.  Symptomatic peripheral vascular tree stenosis: Comparison of subtracted and nonsubtracted 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography with fat suppression , 2000, Acta radiologica.

[2]  C. White,et al.  Clinical practice. Intermittent claudication. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  A. Panju,et al.  Does the clinical examination predict lower extremity peripheral arterial disease? , 2006, JAMA.

[4]  A. Morabito,et al.  Peripheral angioplasty as the first-choice revascularization procedure in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia: prospective study of 993 consecutive patients hospitalized and followed between 1999 and 2003. , 2005, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[5]  Rodney A. White,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Associations for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervent , 2006, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[6]  P Leander,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[7]  Yi Sun,et al.  Performance analysis of maximum intensity projection algorithm for display of MRA images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  F. S. Pereles,et al.  Accuracy of stepping-table lower extremity MR angiography with dual-level bolus timing and separate calf acquisition: hybrid peripheral MR angiography. , 2006, Radiology.

[10]  Michael O Zenge,et al.  High‐resolution continuously acquired peripheral MR angiography featuring partial parallel imaging GRAPPA , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Johannes Lammer,et al.  Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Need for background suppression in contrast‐enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  James F Glockner,et al.  Combination of 2D sensitivity encoding and 2D partial fourier techniques for improved acceleration in 3D contrast‐enhanced MR angiography , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  G. Hankey,et al.  Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease. , 2006, JAMA.

[16]  Rodney A. White,et al.  ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography , 2006, Circulation.

[17]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  High-spatial-resolution multistation MR angiography with parallel imaging and blood pool contrast agent: initial experience. , 2006, Radiology.

[18]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  P. Weatherall,et al.  Novel rapid fat suppression strategy with spectrally selective pulses , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  F. Neumann,et al.  Long-term results after directional atherectomy of femoro-popliteal lesions. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.