Standing on the shoulder of giants: the aspect of free-riding in RePEc rankings

ABSTRACT Research papers in economics (RePEc) rankings have become a well-established source of information about actual and perceived academic performance of institutions, academic fields and their authors. One essential ingredient is the impact factors calculated in RePEc which differ from the standard ones. RePEc reports the ratio of the cumulative citations of all articles of a journal and the number of listed items. The continuously updated RePEc impact factors account for the whole journal and citation history. This approach gives rise to a potential free-riding of authors who profit from journal ranking established in the past. In this article, we demonstrate how the rankings of economists change if one calculates yearly impact factors. The distribution of gains and losses is most pronounced among middle-field ranked authors while the top group shows relative persistence.

[1]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Journal impact measures in bibliometric research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[2]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.

[3]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences , 2009, Scientometrics.

[4]  Christian Seiler,et al.  How Robust are Journal Rankings Based on the Impact Factor? Evidence from the Economic Sciences , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[5]  S. Liebowitz,et al.  Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economic Journals , 1984 .

[6]  Klaus Wohlrabe,et al.  Trends in economics publications represented by JEL categories between 2007 and 2013 , 2015 .

[7]  Christian Zimmermann,et al.  Academic Rankings with RePEc , 2012 .

[8]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Differences in impact factor across fields and over time , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Katharina Rath,et al.  Recent trends in co-authorship in economics: evidence from RePEc , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Philip Hans Franses.  Trends in three decades of rankings of Dutch economists , 2013, Scientometrics.

[11]  Justus Haucap,et al.  What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists , 2015, Scientometrics.

[12]  Roberto Frias,et al.  Statistical variability of top ranking economics journals impact , 2004 .

[13]  K. Wohlrabe,et al.  Citations, journal ranking and multiple authorships reconsidered: evidence from almost one million articles , 2017 .

[14]  John D. Tressler,et al.  Researcher rank stability across alternative output measurement schemes in the context of a time limited research evaluation: the New Zealand case , 2017 .