Early healing events following placement of a palatal subperiosteal orthodontic anchor: a pilot study.

PURPOSE The aim of this report was to describe the initial 8-month healing events of 8 consecutive cases of placement of an onplant device for orthodontic anchorage and to report the results of a questionnaire evaluating subjective patient experience. METHODS At 2 weeks and at 4 and 8 months after placement of the device, presence or absence of exposure of the device, mobility using gentle finger palpation, and signs of possible inflammation were evaluated. At 8 months, the inflammatory status of the tissue-abutment interface was determined from presence or absence of bleeding and/or suppuration on probing. Patients' experience of pain, discomfort, and acceptance of the treatment were evaluated by the use of visual analog scales. RESULTS In 7 of the 8 patients, the device became stable and could be used for orthodontic anchorage. In 1 case, infection occurred, and the device was removed. At the 8-month time point, none of the 7 successful devices showed any plaque or any bleeding or suppuration on stimulation with a periodontal probe. Most patients reported little pain/discomfort from the various treatment procedures and indicated that they felt that opting for the onplant treatment had been the right choice. CONCLUSION The results of this pilot study suggest that placement of the onplant can lead to uneventful healing and stability of the device. Further studies with larger numbers of subjects are necessary to substantiate these findings and to determine the usefulness of this device for orthodontic anchorage.

[1]  F. Celenza Implant-enhanced tooth movement: indirect absolute anchorage. , 2003, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[2]  G. Swennen,et al.  Use of an onplant as orthodontic anchorage. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  O. Dörtbudak,et al.  Short epithetic implants for orthodontic anchorage in the paramedian region of the palate. A clinical study. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  M. Block,et al.  Onplant-supported orthodontic anchorage. , 2001, Atlas of the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[5]  R. Nanda,et al.  Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  P Diedrich,et al.  Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth: A prospective study. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  N. Lang,et al.  Bone-to-implant contact of orthodontic implants in humans subjected to horizontal loading. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  H. Droschl,et al.  Distalization with a Nance appliance and coil springs. , 1997, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[9]  H. Wehrbein,et al.  Orthodontic anchorage capacity of short titanium screw implants in the maxilla. An experimental study in the dog. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  P Diedrich,et al.  The use of palatal implants for orthodontic anchorage. Design and clinical application of the orthosystem. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  H. Wehrbein,et al.  Das Orthosystem — Ein neues Implantatsystem zur orthodontischen Verankerung am Gaumen , 1996, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[12]  P Diedrich,et al.  The Orthosystem--a new implant system for orthodontic anchorage in the palate. , 1996, Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie.

[13]  M. Block,et al.  A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  M. Jones,et al.  Orthodontic facebow injuries and safety equipment. , 1994, European journal of orthodontics.

[15]  H. Upshaw,et al.  Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  D. Birnie,et al.  Penetrating eye injury from orthodontic headgear--a case report. , 1988, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  S. Ryan,et al.  Severe ocular injuries from orthodontic headgear. , 1985, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  D. Seel Extra Oral Hazards of Extra Oral Traction , 1980, British Journal of Orthodontics.

[19]  E. J. Clemmer,et al.  Patient cooperation in wearing orthodontic headgear. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[20]  C. Burstone,et al.  Patient cooperation in orthodontic treatment. , 1968, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[21]  O. Uner,et al.  Comparison of Jones jig molar distalization appliance with extraoral traction. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  B. Melsen,et al.  Different approaches to anchorage: a survey and an evaluation. , 1997, The Angle orthodontist.

[23]  N. H. El-Mangoury Orthodontic cooperation. , 1981, American Journal of Orthodontics.