Geometrical confinement of gadolinium-based contrast agents in nanoporous particles enhances T1 contrast

Magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents are currently designed by modifying their structural and physiochemical properties in order to improve relaxivity and to enhance image contrast. Here we show a general method for increasing relaxivity by confining contrast agents inside the nanoporous structure of silicon particles. Magnevist, gadofullerenes and gadonanotubes were loaded inside the pores of quasi-hemispherical and discoidal particles. For all combinations of nanoconstructs, a boost in longitudinal proton relaxivity r1 was observed: for Magnevist, r1~14 mM-1s-1/Gd3+ion (~8.15×10+7 mM-1s-1/construct); for gadofullerenes, r1~200 mM-1s-1/Gd3+ion (~7×10+9 mM-1s-1/construct); for gadonanotubes, r1~150 mM-1s-1/Gd3+ion (~2×10+9 mM-1s-1/construct). These relaxivity values are about 4 to 50 times larger than that of clinically-available gadolinium-based agents (~4 mM-1s-1 /Gd3+ion). The enhancement in contrast is attributed to the geometrical confinement of the agents, which influences the paramagnetic behavior of the Gd3+ions. Thus, nanoscale confinement offers a new and general strategy for enhancing the contrast of gadolinium-based contrast agents.

[1]  Zhigang Li,et al.  Fluid enhancement of particle transport in nanochannels , 2006 .

[2]  M Ferrari,et al.  Size and shape effects in the biodistribution of intravascularly injected particles. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[3]  K. Nicolay,et al.  Relaxivity of liposomal paramagnetic MRI contrast agents , 2005, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[4]  E.,et al.  Paramagnetic Metal Complexes as Water Proton Relaxation Agents for NMR Imaging : Theory and Design , 2001 .

[5]  L. Helm,et al.  Phosphinic derivative of DTPA conjugated to a G5 PAMAM dendrimer: an 17O and 1H relaxation study of its Gd(III) complex. , 2006, Dalton transactions.

[6]  Sophie Laurent,et al.  Comparative study of the physicochemical properties of six clinical low molecular weight gadolinium contrast agents. , 2006, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[7]  Wei Yang,et al.  Rational design of protein-based MRI contrast agents. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  S. Ludtke,et al.  Superparamagnetic gadonanotubes are high-performance MRI contrast agents. , 2005, Chemical communications.

[9]  R. Lauffer,et al.  Gadolinium(III) Chelates as MRI Contrast Agents: Structure, Dynamics, and Applications. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[10]  Michael J Sailor,et al.  Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications. , 2009, Nature materials.

[11]  J. Kowalewski,et al.  General treatment of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement associated with translational diffusion. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  J. West,et al.  The Differential Cytotoxicity of Water-Soluble Fullerenes , 2004 .

[13]  M Ferrari,et al.  The adhesive strength of non-spherical particles mediated by specific interactions. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[14]  Peter Mansfield,et al.  Snapshot magnetic resonance imaging (Nobel lecture). , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Intravascular Delivery of Particulate Systems: Does Geometry Really Matter? , 2008, Pharmaceutical Research.

[16]  M. Wong,et al.  Destroying gadofullerene aggregates by salt addition in aqueous solution of Gd@C(60)(OH)(x) and Gd@C(60)[C(COOH(2))](10). , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  M. Botta,et al.  Maximizing the relaxivity of HSA-bound gadolinium complexes by simultaneous optimization of rotation and water exchange. , 2007, Chemical communications.

[18]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Sustained small interfering RNA delivery by mesoporous silicon particles. , 2010, Cancer research.

[19]  Daniel Scherman,et al.  Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes with amphiphilic gd3+ chelates: toward powerful t1 and t2 MRI contrast agents. , 2008, Nano letters.

[20]  R. Smalley,et al.  Cutting Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes through Fluorination , 2002 .

[21]  M. Botta.  Second Coordination Sphere Water Molecules and Relaxivity of Gadolinium(III) Complexes: Implications for MRI Contrast Agents , 2000 .

[22]  Juan L. Vivero-Escoto,et al.  Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as controlled release drug delivery and gene transfection carriers. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[23]  Y. Mackeyev,et al.  Functionalization of individual ultra-short single-walled carbon nanotubes , 2006 .

[24]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Tailored porous silicon microparticles: fabrication and properties. , 2010, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[25]  B. Sitharaman,et al.  Water-soluble gadofullerenes: toward high-relaxivity, pH-responsive MRI contrast agents. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  A. Nunn,et al.  Can receptors be imaged with MRI agents? , 1997, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[27]  R. Muthupillai,et al.  Gadonanotubes as ultrasensitive pH-smart probes for magnetic resonance imaging. , 2008, Nano letters.

[28]  W. Freeman,et al.  Porous silicon in drug delivery devices and materials. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[29]  B. Sitharaman,et al.  Understanding paramagnetic relaxation phenomena for water-soluble gadofullerenes , 2007 .

[30]  Klaas Nicolay,et al.  Nanoparticulate assemblies of amphiphiles and diagnostically active materials for multimodality imaging. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[31]  Marcelino Bernardo,et al.  Dendrimer-based nanoprobe for dual modality magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging. , 2006, Nano letters.

[32]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Mesoporous silicon particles as a multistage delivery system for imaging and therapeutic applications. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.