Scale-based method for correcting background intensity variation in acquired images

An automatic, acquisition-protocol-independent, entirely image-based strategy for correcting background intensity variation in medical images has been developed. Local scale - a fundamental image property that is derivable entirely from the image and that does not require any prior knowledge about the imaging protocol or object material property distributions - is used to obtain a set of homogeneous regions, no matter what each region is, and to fit a 2nd degree polynomial to the intensity variation within them. This polynomial is used to correct the intensity variation. The above procedure is repeated for the corrected image until the size of segmented homogeneous regions does not change significantly from that in the previous iteration. Intensity scale standardization is effected to make sure that the corrected images are not biased by the fitting strategy. The method has been tested on 1000 3D mathematical phantoms, which include 5 levels each of blurring and noise and 4 types of background variation - additive and multiplicative Gaussian and ramp. It has also been tested on 10 clinical MRI data sets of the brain. These tests, and a comparison with the method of homomorphic filtering, indicate the effectiveness of the method.

[1]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data , 1995, CVRMed.

[2]  L G Nyúl,et al.  On standardizing the MR image intensity scale , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Michael Brady,et al.  Estimating the bias field of MR images , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Artery-vein separation via MRA-An image processing approach , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Martin Styner,et al.  Parametric estimate of intensity inhomogeneities applied to MRI , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  J. Haselgrove,et al.  An algorithm for compensation of surface-coil images for sensitivity of the surface coil , 1986 .

[8]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Correction of intensity variations in MR images for computer-aided tissue classification , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Optimum Image Thresholding via Class Uncertainty and Region Homogeneity , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  L. Axel,et al.  Intensity correction in surface-coil MR imaging. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Task-specific comparison of 3D image registration methods , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Retrospective correction of intensity inhomogeneities in MRI , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[13]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Scale-Based Fuzzy Connected Image Segmentation: Theory, Algorithms, and Validation , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[14]  Douglas L. Rickman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging multispectral tissue classification , 1988 .