Effects of Maxwell‐Wagner polarization on soil complex dielectric permittivity under variable temperature and electrical conductivity

The presence of free charges and numerous discontinuities separating liquid, gas, and solid phases in partially saturated soils give rise to Maxwell-Wagner polarization that may significantly affect bulk dielectric permittivity measurements. Evidence suggests a complex interplay shaping the response of low-frequency (<100 MHz) dielectric permittivity to changes in ambient temperature and amount of ionic charges present in a wet soil. Model calculations based on the Maxwell-Wagner-Brugermann-Hanai (MWBH) theory are supported by direct measurements using a network analyzer, showing an increase in soil bulk dielectric permittivity with increasing temperature and with higher bulk electrical conductivity at low frequency range (<100 MHz). Beyond a certain frequency the decrease in permittivity of free water becomes dominant and results in a decrease in soil bulk dielectric permittivity with increasing temperature. The value of this crossover frequency can be predicted as a function of solution electrical conductivity (EC) as confirmed in limited tests. The dielectric permittivity inferred from TDR waveform travel time analysis is not significantly influenced by the low frequency range of the dielectric spectrum. In contrast, dielectric permittivity sensors operating at frequencies lower than 100 MHz are likely to show significant sensitivity to factors affecting the Maxwell-Wagner effect (temperature and electrical conductivity), hence requiring special care in measurement interpretation.

[1]  Anthony L. Endres,et al.  Modelling the Electrical Properties of Porous Rocks and Soils Containing Immiscible Contaminants , 1996 .

[2]  D. Or,et al.  Temperature effects on soil bulk dielectric permittivity measured by time domain reflectometry: Experimental evidence and hypothesis development , 1999 .

[3]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  TDR calibration of organic forest floor media , 1997 .

[4]  A. Endres Size Scale Considerations in Modelling the Electrical Conductivity of Porous Rocks and Soils , 2000 .

[5]  Tamaz Chelidze,et al.  Electrical spectroscopy of porous rocks: a review—I. Theoretical models , 1999 .

[6]  D. Or,et al.  Time domain reflectometry measurement principles and applications , 2002 .

[7]  T. Miyamoto,et al.  Extended Dual Composite Sphere Model for Determining Dielectric Permittivity of Andisols , 2005 .

[8]  S. Friedman,et al.  Particle shape characterization using angle of repose measurements for predicting the effective permittivity and electrical conductivity of saturated granular media , 2002 .

[9]  R. Alvarez,et al.  COMPLEX DIELECTRIC PERMITTIVITY IN ROCKS: A METHOD FOR ITS MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS , 1973 .

[10]  D. Or,et al.  Geometrical factors and interfacial processes affecting complex dielectric permittivity of partially saturated porous media , 2006 .

[11]  A. Stogryn,et al.  Equations for Calculating the Dielectric Constant of Saline Water (Correspondence) , 1971 .

[12]  J. E. Campbell,et al.  Dielectric properties and influence of conductivity in soils at one to fifty megahertz , 1990 .

[13]  Tetsuya Hanai,et al.  Theory of dielectric relaxations due to the interfacial polarization for two-component suspensions of spheres , 1986 .

[14]  Vincent P. Drnevich,et al.  Theoretical model of a multisection time domain reflectometry measurement system , 1999 .

[15]  Dani Or,et al.  Frequency analysis of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) with application to dielectric spectroscopy of soil constituents , 1999 .

[16]  A. Tabbagh,et al.  Differential effective medium schemes for investigating the relationship between high‐frequency relative dielectric permittivity and water content of soils , 2003 .

[17]  R. Roldán-Toro,et al.  Wide-frequency-range dielectric response of polystyrene latex dispersions. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[18]  G. Topp,et al.  Time domain reflectometry : a seminal technique for measuring mass and energy in soil , 1998 .

[19]  C. Dirksen,et al.  IMPROVED CALIBRATION OF TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY SOIL WATER CONTENT MEASUREMENTS , 1993 .

[20]  Scott B. Jones,et al.  Surface area, geometrical and configurational effects on permittivity of porous media , 2002 .

[21]  Timo J. Heimovaara,et al.  Frequency domain analysis of time domain reflectometry waveforms: 1. Measurement of the complex dielectric permittivity of soils , 1994 .

[22]  Nigel J. Livingston,et al.  Temperature‐Dependent Measurement Errors in Time Domain Reflectometry Determinations of Soil Water , 1995 .

[23]  David G. Chandler,et al.  Field Calibration of Water Content Reflectometers , 2004 .

[24]  Scott B. Jones,et al.  Frequency Domain Analysis for Extending Time Domain Reflectometry Water Content Measurement in Highly Saline Soils , 2004 .

[25]  C.-P. Lin Analysis of nonuniform and dispersive time domain reflectometry measurement systems with application to the dielectric spectroscopy of soils , 2003 .

[26]  D. Or,et al.  Temperature effects on soil bulk dielectric permittivity measured by time domain reflectometry: A physical model , 1999 .

[27]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[28]  Willem Bouten,et al.  Obtaining the Spatial Distribution of Water Content along a TDR Probe Using the SCEM‐UA Bayesian Inverse Modeling Scheme , 2004 .

[29]  Brent Clothier,et al.  A Dielectric–Water Content Relationship for Sandy Volcanic Soils in New Zealand , 1999 .

[30]  Yi Huang,et al.  Radar frequency dielectric dispersion in sandstone: Implications for determination of moisture and clay content , 2003 .

[31]  Koji Asami,et al.  Characterization of heterogeneous systems by dielectric spectroscopy , 2002 .

[32]  Liu Fractal model for the ac response of a rough interface. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[33]  A. Norris A differential scheme for the effective moduli of composites , 1985 .

[34]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  On the effective measurement frequency of time domain reflectometry in dispersive and nonconductive dielectric materials , 2005 .

[35]  M. Stuchly,et al.  Coaxial Line Reflection Methods for Measuring Dielectric Properties of Biological Substances at Radio and Microwave Frequencies-A Review , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[36]  S. Jones,et al.  A Review of Advances in Dielectric and Electrical Conductivity Measurement in Soils Using Time Domain Reflectometry , 2003 .

[37]  A. Nadler Comments on ``Field Calibration of Water Content Reflectometers'' , 2005 .

[38]  C. Cametti,et al.  Reduction of the contribution of electrode polarization effects in the radiowave dielectric measurements of highly conductive biological cell suspensions. , 2001, Bioelectrochemistry.

[39]  P. N. Sen,et al.  A self-similar model for sedimentary rocks with application to the dielectric constant of fused glass beads , 1981 .