Incidence and Predictors of Early and Late Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in 663 Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and predictors

Background —There is a lack of information on the incidence and predictors of early mortality at 30 days and late mortality between 30 days and 1 year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the self-expanding CoreValve Revalving prosthesis. Methods and Results —A total of 663 consecutive patients (mean age 81.0 (cid:1) 7.3 years) underwent TAVI with the third generation 18-Fr CoreValve device in 14 centers. Procedural success and intraprocedural mortality were 98% and 0.9%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of mortality were 5.4% at 30 days, 12.2% at 6 months, and 15.0% at 1 year. The incidence density of mortality was 12.3 per 100 person-year of observation. Clinical and hemodynamic benefits observed acutely after TAVI were sustained at 1 year. Paravalvular leakages were trace to mild in the majority of cases. Conversion to open heart surgery (odds ratio [OR] 38.68), cardiac tamponade (OR 10.97), major access site complications (OR 8.47), left ventricular ejection fraction (cid:2) 40% (OR 3.51), prior balloon valvuloplasty (OR 2.87), and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.66) were independent predictors of mortality at 30 days, whereas prior stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 5.47), postprocedural paravalvular leak (cid:1) 2 (cid:3) (HR 3.79), prior acute pulmonary edema (HR 2.70), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.53) were independent predictors of mortality between 30 days and 1 year. Conclusions —Benefit of TAVI with the CoreValve Revalving System is maintained over time up to 1 year, with acceptable mortality rates at various time points. Although procedural complications are strongly associated with early mortality at 30 days, comorbidities and postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation (cid:1) 2 (cid:3) mainly impact late outcomes between 30 days and 1 year. ( Circulation . 2011;123:299-308.)

[1]  H. Eggebrecht,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. , 2011, European heart journal.

[2]  S. Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Thirty-Day Results of the SAPIEN Aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry: A European Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Edwards SAPIEN Valve , 2010, Circulation.

[4]  A. Yan,et al.  Disparities in management patterns and outcomes of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome with and without a history of cerebrovascular disease. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  D. Capodanno,et al.  Balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis as a bridge to high-risk transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2010, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[6]  Fabian Nietlispach,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk: acute and late outcomes of the multicenter Canadian experience. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  B. Bouma,et al.  Factors associated with cardiac conduction disorders and permanent pacemaker implantation after percutaneous aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve prosthesis. , 2010, American heart journal.

[8]  Navid Madershahian,et al.  Minimally invasive transapical aortic valve implantation and the risk of acute kidney injury. , 2010, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  J. Suárez de Lezo,et al.  Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding aortic valve prosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis: early experience in Spain. , 2010, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[10]  Philippe Pibarot,et al.  Acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictive factors, prognostic value, and comparison with surgical aortic valve replacement , 2009, European heart journal.

[11]  Bijoy K Khandheria,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Card , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[12]  Fabian Nietlispach,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Impact on Clinical and Valve-Related Outcomes , 2009, Circulation.

[13]  A. Cribier,et al.  Outcomes and safety of percutaneous aortic valve replacement. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  D. Capodanno,et al.  Procedural success and 30-day clinical outcomes after percutaneous aortic valve replacement using current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. , 2009, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[15]  D. Capodanno,et al.  Early Conduction Disorders Following Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[16]  T. Felderhoff,et al.  Progress and Current Status of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Three Device Generations of the CoreValve Revalving System , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[17]  T. Sundt,et al.  Is the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation model valid for estimating the operative risk of patients considered for percutaneous aortic valve replacement? , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  P. Serruys,et al.  Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) corevalve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval. , 2008, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  J. Mayer,et al.  Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[20]  A. Ducharme,et al.  Surgical aspects of endovascular retrograde implantation of the aortic CoreValve bioprosthesis in high-risk older patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  Lukas Altwegg,et al.  Percutaneous Transarterial Aortic Valve Replacement in Selected High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis , 2007, Circulation.

[22]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  A. Garg,et al.  Chronic kidney disease and mortality risk: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[24]  A. Cribier,et al.  Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  M. Viitanen,et al.  Poor Outcome After First-Ever Stroke: Predictors for Death, Dependency, and Recurrent Stroke Within the First Year , 2003, Stroke.

[26]  Assaf Bash,et al.  Percutaneous Transcatheter Implantation of an Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: First Human Case Description , 2002, Circulation.