Selectivity, scope, and simplicity of models: a lesson from fitting judgments of perceived depth.

When comparing psychological models a researcher should assess their relative selectivity, scope, and simplicity. The third of these considerations can be measured by the models' parameter counts or equation length, the second by their ability to fit random data, and the first by their differential ability to fit patterned data over random data. These conclusions are based on exploration of integration models reflecting depth judgments. Replication of Massaro's (1988a) results revealed an additive model (Bruno & Cutting, 1988), and Massaro's fuzzy-logical model of perception (FLMP) fit data equally well, but further exploration showed that the FLMP fit random data better. The FLMP's successes may reflect not its sensitivity in capturing psychological process but its scope in fitting any data and its complexity as measured by equation length.

[1]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Theory of probability , 1896 .

[2]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[3]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[4]  E. Brunswik.  Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[5]  J. Hochberg.  Effects of the Gestalt revolution: the Cornell symposium on perception. , 1957, Psychology Review.

[6]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[7]  A. Parducci.  Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[8]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[9]  T. Künnapas,et al.  [Distance perception as a function of available visual cues]. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Andrei N. Kolmogorov,et al.  Logical basis for information theory and probability theory , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  E. Leeuwenberg.  A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  A. Parducci.  Chapter 5 – CONTEXTUAL EFFECTS: A RANGE–FREQUENCY ANALYSIS* , 1974 .

[13]  T. Kuhn.  Second thoughts on paradigms , 1977 .

[14]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Essential Tension , 1977 .

[15]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[16]  R. Ackermann.  The Philosophy of Karl Popper. , 1978 .

[17]  D. Krantz.  The structure of scientific theories. 2nd ed. , 1978 .

[18]  R. Haber,et al.  Visual Perception , 2018, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[19]  F. Suppe.  The Structure of Scientific Theories. , 1975 .

[20]  F. Restle.  Coding theory of the perception of motion configurations. , 1979, Psychological review.

[21]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[22]  J. Cutting,et al.  The minimum principle and the perception of absolute, common, and relative motions , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  J. Beck.  Organization and representation in perception , 1982 .

[24]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Methods of information integration theory , 1982 .

[25]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[26]  J. Cutting,et al.  Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  W. Epstein,et al.  The status of the minimum principle in the theoretical analysis of visual perception. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  D W Massaro,et al.  Attention and perception: an information-integration perspective. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[29]  Charles E. Collyer,et al.  Comparing strong and weak models by fitting them to computer-generated data , 1985 .

[30]  D W Massaro,et al.  Addressing issues in letter recognition , 1986, Psychological research.

[31]  D. Massaro.  Speech Perception By Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry , 1989 .

[32]  A. Remole.  PERCEPTION WITH AN EYE FOR MOTION , 1987 .

[33]  D. Roberts,et al.  The statistical program SYSTAT : Wilkinson, L. (1986). SYSTAT, The System for Statistics. SYSTAT, Inc. 2902 Central Street, Evanston, IL 60201. , 1987 .

[34]  D. Massaro.  Ambiguity in perception and experimentation. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[36]  N Bruno,et al.  Additivity, subadditivity, and the use of visual information: a reply to Massaro (1988). , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  D. Massaro.  Some criticisms of connectionist models of human performance , 1988 .

[38]  J. Cutting,et al.  Minimodularity and the perception of layout. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  A Statistical Framework for Robust Fusion of Depth Information , 1989, Other Conferences.

[40]  D. Massaro,et al.  Models of integration given multiple sources of information. , 1990, Psychological review.

[41]  William R. Uttal,et al.  On some two-way barriers between models and mechanisms , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the Lengths of Rods That are Held But Not Wielded , 1990 .

[43]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[44]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  The Perception of Structure: Essays in Honor of Wendell R. Garner , 1991 .

[45]  S. Shott,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics , 2018, The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences.

[46]  James R. Pomerantz,et al.  Perception of structure: An overview. , 1991 .

[47]  R. Nosofsky.  Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Why our stimuli look as they do. , 1991 .

[49]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Psychophysical estimation of the human depth combination rule , 1991, Other Conferences.

[50]  To Perceive is to Know--Or is it? , 1993 .