Environment-specific noise suppression for improved speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users.

Attempts to develop noise-suppression algorithms that can significantly improve speech intelligibility in noise by cochlear implant (CI) users have met with limited success. This is partly because algorithms were sought that would work equally well in all listening situations. Accomplishing this has been quite challenging given the variability in the temporal/spectral characteristics of real-world maskers. A different approach is taken in the present study focused on the development of environment-specific noise suppression algorithms. The proposed algorithm selects a subset of the envelope amplitudes for stimulation based on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of each channel. Binary classifiers, trained using data collected from a particular noisy environment, are first used to classify the mixture envelopes of each channel as either target-dominated (SNR>or=0 dB) or masker-dominated (SNR<0 dB). Only target-dominated channels are subsequently selected for stimulation. Results with CI listeners indicated substantial improvements (by nearly 44 percentage points at 5 dB SNR) in intelligibility with the proposed algorithm when tested with sentences embedded in three real-world maskers. The present study demonstrated that the environment-specific approach to noise reduction has the potential to restore speech intelligibility in noise to a level near to that attained in quiet.

[1]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  SNR estimation based on amplitude modulation analysis with applications to noise suppression , 2003, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[2]  S Hellman,et al.  Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant users. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[3]  Philipos C Loizou,et al.  Use of S-Shaped Input-Output Functions for Noise Suppression in Cochlear Implants , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[4]  David Pearce,et al.  The aurora experimental framework for the performance evaluation of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions , 2000, INTERSPEECH.

[5]  IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.

[6]  Chin-Hui Lee,et al.  On-line adaptive learning of the continuous density hidden Markov model based on approximate recursive Bayes estimate , 1997, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[7]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Speech enhancement based on physiological and psychoacoustical models of modulation perception and binaural interaction. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[10]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[11]  Arne Leijon,et al.  An efficient robust sound classification algorithm for hearing aids. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Yi Hu,et al.  A new sound coding strategy for suppressing noise in cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing - The Sparse Way, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[14]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  The Design and Evaluation of a Hearing Aid with Trainable Amplification Parameters , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[15]  Yi Hu,et al.  Subspace algorithms for noise reduction in cochlear implants. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Yi Hu,et al.  Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[18]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  P. Loizou,et al.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M R Weiss Effects of noise and noise reduction processing on the operation of the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant processor. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  Yang Lu,et al.  An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Q. Fu,et al.  Spectral subtraction-based speech enhancement for cochlear implant patients in background noise. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Philipos C Loizou,et al.  A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.