Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Classification: Cross-Database Evaluation

Fetal Heart Rate (FHR) provides obstetricians with essential information about fetal reactions to stress events during delivery. Early detection of fetal acidosis, enabling timely interventions and prevention of adverse consequences of acidosis for fetuses, remains a challenging task. In particular, the use of different, proprietary and small databases in various published works hinders meaningful comparisons of achieved results. This work relies on the the use of two independent databases in order to asses relevantly acidosis detection performance and to address important issues of knowledge transfer (features, classification model) from one database to the other. Using a large set of features, supervised classification is performed with state-of-the-art sparse support vector machines. It shows that selected features and classification performance are consistent for both databases. Further it quantifies the level of generalization of the achieved results, by making use of one database for learning and the other one for testing.

[1]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms , 1997, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[2]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Sparse Support Vector Machine for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Classification , 2017, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[3]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Predicting the risk of metabolic acidosis for newborns based on fetal heart rate signal classification using support vector machines , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Antoniya Georgieva,et al.  Umbilical cord gases in relation to the neonatal condition: the EveREst plot. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[5]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Open access intrapartum CTG database , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[6]  Josiane Mothe,et al.  Nonconvex Regularizations for Feature Selection in Ranking With Sparse SVM , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[7]  Paulo Gonçalves,et al.  Hurst exponent and intrapartum fetal heart rate: Impact of decelerations , 2013, Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems.

[8]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate signals as the predictor of neonatal acidemia , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Doina Precup,et al.  Classification of Normal and Hypoxic Fetuses From Systems Modeling of Intrapartum Cardiotocography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Fetal Heart Rate Classification Using Generative Models , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  K. Rosen,et al.  Do spectral bands of fetal heart rate variability associate with concomitant fetal scalp pH? , 2013, Early human development.

[12]  Madalena Costa,et al.  Multiscale entropy analysis of biological signals. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  K. Maršál,et al.  Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[14]  Leah Antoniewicz,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[16]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Fractal Analysis and Hurst Parameter for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Variability Analysis: A Versatile Alternative to Frequency Bands and LF/HF Ratio , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  Nelly Pustelnik,et al.  P-leader multifractal analysis and sparse SVM for intrapartum fetal acidosis detection , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[18]  Austin Ugwumadu,et al.  Understanding cardiotocographic patterns associated with intrapartum fetal hypoxia and neurologic injury. , 2013, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[19]  M. Moulden,et al.  A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period. , 2007, Early human development.

[21]  G S Dawes,et al.  The advantages of computerized fetal heart rate analysis , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[22]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Multifractal analysis of fetal heart rate variability in fetuses with and without severe acidosis during labor. , 2011, American journal of perinatology.

[23]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[24]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians. , 2015, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[25]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Using nonlinear features for fetal heart rate classification , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[26]  Pascal Gaucherand,et al.  Use of peripartum ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram without blood sampling: a large prospective cohort study. , 2011, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[27]  P. Abry,et al.  Bootstrap for Empirical Multifractal Analysis , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[28]  Janusz Wrobel,et al.  Analysis of extracted cardiotocographic signal features to improve automated prediction of fetal outcome , 2010 .

[29]  Nelly Pustelnik,et al.  Intrapartum fetal heart rate classification from trajectory in Sparse SVM feature space , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[30]  Joakim Andén,et al.  Scattering Transform for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Variability Fractal Analysis: A Case-Control Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .