Systematic correlation of continuous-wave Doppler and hemodynamic measurements in patients with aortic stenosis.

The purpose of this study was to compare estimates of pressure gradients obtained from continuous-wave (CW) Doppler recordings with direct pressure measurements derived from cardiac catheterization in patients with aortic stenosis. Forty patients who underwent cardiac catheterization for evaluation of aortic stenosis were prospectively studied with CW Doppler spectral recordings of the aortic valve prior to catheterization. Thirty-three patients underwent a second Doppler examination simultaneously with pressure recordings in the catheterization laboratory. Nineteen of the patients had catheterization pressures measured using high-fidelity, micromanometer-tip catheters. Doppler and pressure tracings were digitized using a microprocessor-based computer with a software program which allowed for calculation of maximal instantaneous, mean, and peak-to-peak gradients, plus ejection and acceleration times. Maximal instantaneous gradient by CW Doppler showed an excellent correlation with maximal instantaneous catheterization gradient (r = 0.93, SEE = 9 mm Hg). The correlation of maximal instantaneous Doppler gradient with peak-to-peak catheterization gradient was also linear (r = 0.85, SEE = 12 mm Hg), but there was a consistent overestimation of peak-to-peak gradient in 38 of 40 cases (mean = 17 mm Hg). Mean gradient as calculated by the two techniques correlated best of all measurements performed (r = 0.95, SEE = 6 mm Hg). When patients were grouped into subsets of mild (0 to 25 mm Hg), moderate (25 to 50 mm Hg), and severe (greater than 50 mm Hg) levels of stenosis, the correlation of maximal instantaneous Doppler and peak-to-peak catheterization gradients were r = 0.22, 0.44, and 0.77, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  W. Roberts,et al.  Severe valvular aortic stenosis in patients over 65 years of age. A clinicopathologic study. , 1971, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  L Hatle,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. , 1980, British heart journal.

[3]  A. Luisada,et al.  Mechanism of changes in the second heart sound in aortic stenosis. , 1971, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  J. Perloff,et al.  The clinical significance of the fourth heart sound in aortic stenosis. , 1971, American Journal of Cardiology.

[5]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Value and Limitations of Cross‐sectional Echocardiography of the Aortic Valve in the Diagnosis and Quantification of Valvular Aortic Stenosis , 1980, Circulation.

[6]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Noninvasive quantification of stenotic semilunar valve areas by Doppler echocardiography. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  D. Bruns,et al.  THE AORTIC SYSTOLIC MURMUR DEVELOPING WITH INCREASING AGE , 1958, British heart journal.

[8]  J. Seward,et al.  Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. , 1985, Circulation.

[9]  J. Perloff Clinical recognition of aortic stenosis the physical signs and differential diagnosis of the various forms of obstruction to left ventricular outflow , 1968 .

[10]  M Berger,et al.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  A. Weyman,et al.  A new method to calculate aortic valve area without left heart catheterization. , 1984, Circulation.

[12]  Randolph P. Martin,et al.  Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  S Simonsen,et al.  Determination of Pressure Gradient in Mitral Stenosis with a Non‐invasive Ultrasound Doppler Technique , 2009 .

[14]  J. Elion,et al.  Correlation of continuous wave Doppler velocities with cardiac catheterization gradients: an experimental model of aortic stenosis. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  W. Bancroft,et al.  Critical analysis of clinical factors in estimating severity of aortic valve disease. , 1973, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  L Hatle,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. , 1978, British heart journal.

[17]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Congenital Aortic Stenosis: I. Clinical and Hemodynamic Findings in 100 Patients; II. Surgical Treatment and the Results of Operation , 1963 .

[18]  R GORLIN,et al.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. , 1951, American heart journal.

[19]  D. Harrison,et al.  Aortic stenosis in the elderly. , 1969, Geriatrics.

[20]  E. Braunwald,et al.  OBSTRUCTION TO LEFT VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW. CURRENT CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF PATIENTS FOR OPERATION. , 1963, The American journal of cardiology.