Hydrodynamic pressure sensing with an artificial lateral line in steady and unsteady flows

With the overall goal being a better understanding of the sensing environment from the local perspective of a situated agent, we studied uniform flows and Kármán vortex streets in a frame of reference relevant to a fish or swimming robot. We visualized each flow regime with digital particle image velocimetry and then took local measurements using a rigid body with laterally distributed parallel pressure sensor arrays. Time and frequency domain methods were used to characterize hydrodynamically relevant scenarios in steady and unsteady flows for control applications. Here we report that a distributed pressure sensing mechanism has the capability to discriminate Kármán vortex streets from uniform flows, and determine the orientation and position of the platform with respect to the incoming flow and the centre axis of the Kármán vortex street. It also enables the computation of hydrodynamic features which may be relevant for a robot while interacting with the flow, such as vortex shedding frequency, vortex travelling speed and downstream distance between vortices. A Kármán vortex street was distinguished in this study from uniform flows by analysing the magnitude of fluctuations present in the sensor measurements and the number of sensors detecting the same dominant frequency. In the Kármán vortex street the turbulence intensity was 30% higher than that in the uniform flow and the sensors collectively sensed the vortex shedding frequency as the dominant frequency. The position and orientation of the sensor platform were determined via a comparative analysis between laterally distributed sensor arrays; the vortex travelling speed was estimated via a cross-correlation analysis among the sensors.

[1]  H. Bleckmann Reception of hydrodynamic stimuli in aquatic and semiaquatic animals , 1994 .

[2]  Masashige Taguchi,et al.  Rainbow trout consume less oxygen in turbulence: the energetics of swimming behaviors at different speeds , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  Brenden P. Epps,et al.  Swimming performance of a biomimetic compliant fish-like robot , 2009 .

[4]  S. Vogel Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow , 1981 .

[5]  G. Lauder,et al.  The Kármán gait: novel body kinematics of rainbow trout swimming in a vortex street , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Christoph Brücker,et al.  Entraining in trout: a behavioural and hydrodynamic analysis , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Review of graphene-based strain sensors , 2013 .

[8]  Jack Chen,et al.  Development and characterization of surface micromachined, out-of-plane hot-wire anemometer , 2003 .

[9]  Anke Schmitz,et al.  Organization of the superficial neuromast system in goldfish, Carassius auratus , 2008, Journal of morphology.

[10]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  Lateral line system of fish. , 2009, Integrative zoology.

[11]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Artificial lateral line with biomimetic neuromasts to emulate fish sensing , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[12]  Webb Entrainment by river chub nocomis micropogon and smallmouth bass micropterus dolomieu on cylinders , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  S. Coombs,et al.  Nearfield detection of dipole sources by the goldfish (Carassius auratus) and the mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi). , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  G. Lauder,et al.  Passive propulsion in vortex wakes , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Christoph Brücker,et al.  Measuring Flow Velocity and Flow Direction by Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Flow Fluctuations , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Coughlin,et al.  Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss consume less energy when swimming near obstructions. , 2010, Journal of fish biology.

[17]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Determination of object position, vortex shedding frequency and flow velocity using artificial lateral line canals , 2011, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[18]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  Against the flow: A Braitenberg controller for a fish robot , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[19]  Paolo Fiorini,et al.  Towards flow-sensing robots: Situated analysis for PIV flow imaging , 2011, 2011 15th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR).

[20]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Distant touch hydrodynamic imaging with an artificial lateral line , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Lily D. Chambers,et al.  What information do Kármán streets offer to flow sensing? , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[22]  Promode R. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Biorobotic insights into how animals swim , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  P W Webb,et al.  Turbulence: does vorticity affect the structure and shape of body and fin propulsors? , 2010, Integrative and comparative biology.

[24]  J. Montgomery,et al.  The lateral line can mediate rheotaxis in fish , 1997, Nature.

[25]  S. Dijkgraaf THE FUNCTIONING and SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LATERAL‐LINE ORGANS , 1963, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[26]  J. Liao Neuromuscular control of trout swimming in a vortex street: implications for energy economy during the Kármán gait , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  J. Liao,et al.  A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  A bio-mimetic design and control of a fish-like robot using compliant structures , 2011, 2011 15th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR).

[29]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  Kármán vortex street detection by the lateral line , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  R. Cingolani,et al.  Stress-driven AlN cantilever-based flow sensor for fish lateral line system , 2011 .

[31]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Forces on oscillating foils for propulsion and maneuvering , 2003 .