Prefrontal Cortical Mechanisms Underlying Individual Differences in Cognitive Flexibility and Stability

The pFC is critical for cognitive flexibility (i.e., our ability to flexibly adjust behavior to changing environmental demands), but also for cognitive stability (i.e., our ability to follow behavioral plans in the face of distraction). Behavioral research suggests that individuals differ in their cognitive flexibility and stability, and neurocomputational theories of working memory relate this variability to the concept of attractor stability in recurrently connected neural networks. We introduce a novel task paradigm to simultaneously assess flexible switching between task rules (cognitive flexibility) and task performance in the presence of irrelevant distractors (cognitive stability) and to furthermore assess the individual “spontaneous switching rate” in response to ambiguous stimuli to quantify the individual dispositional cognitive flexibility in a theoretically motivated way (i.e., as a proxy for attractor stability). Using fMRI in healthy human participants, a common network consisting of parietal and frontal areas was found for task switching and distractor inhibition. More flexible persons showed reduced activation and reduced functional coupling in frontal areas, including the inferior frontal junction, during task switching. Most importantly, the individual spontaneous switching rate antagonistically affected the functional coupling between inferior frontal junction and the superior frontal gyrus during task switching and distractor inhibition, respectively, indicating that individual differences in cognitive flexibility and stability are indeed related to a common prefrontal neural mechanism. We suggest that the concept of attractor stability of prefrontal working memory networks is a meaningful model for individual differences in cognitive stability versus flexibility.

[1]  A. Jersild Mental set and shift , 2011 .

[2]  T. Robbins,et al.  Defining the Neural Mechanisms of Probabilistic Reversal Learning Using Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  E. Kandel,et al.  Transient and Selective Overexpression of Dopamine D2 Receptors in the Striatum Causes Persistent Abnormalities in Prefrontal Cortex Functioning , 2006, Neuron.

[4]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of attention shifting: Individual differences in fMRI during multiple shift types , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Erratum to: Effects of neuromodulation in a cortical network model of object working memory dominated by recurrent inhibition , 2014, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[6]  Michael Petrides,et al.  Dissociable roles of the posterior parietal and the prefrontal cortex in manipulation and monitoring processes , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[9]  Richard Coppola,et al.  Instability of prefrontal signal processing in schizophrenia. , 2006, The American journal of psychiatry.

[10]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Function and Structure of the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex Predict Individual Differences in Response Inhibition: A Model-Based Approach , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Genes, dopamine and cortical signal-to-noise ratio in schizophrenia , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociating Inhibition, Attention, and Response Control in the Frontoparietal Network Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  T. Robbins Shifting and stopping: fronto-striatal substrates, neurochemical modulation and clinical implications , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  T. Goschke Dysfunctions of decision‐making and cognitive control as transdiagnostic mechanisms of mental disorders: advances, gaps, and needs in current research , 2014, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[17]  Daniel Durstewitz,et al.  The computational role of dopamine D1 receptors in working memory , 2002, Neural Networks.

[18]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Neurocomputational models of working memory , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  E. Rolls,et al.  Computational models of schizophrenia and dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  A Dynamical Systems Hypothesis of Schizophrenia , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  C. Curtis,et al.  Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  B. Franke,et al.  Human cognitive flexibility depends on dopamine D2 receptor signaling , 2011, Psychopharmacology.

[24]  Tor D Wager,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. Brass,et al.  Neural activations at the junction of the inferior frontal sulcus and the inferior precentral sulcus: Interindividual variability, reliability, and association with sulcal morphology , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[26]  Jan Derrfuss,et al.  Cognitive control in the posterior frontolateral cortex: evidence from common activations in task coordination, interference control, and working memory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[27]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory , 1995, Nature.

[28]  N. Meiran,et al.  Component Processes in Task Switching , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  The Roles of Timing and Task Order during Task Switching , 2002, NeuroImage.

[30]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[31]  G. Dreisbach,et al.  How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[34]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  M. Greicius,et al.  Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Event‐related fMRI: Comparison of conditions with varying BOLD overlap , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[37]  John D. E. Gabrieli,et al.  Shared and selective neural correlates of inhibition, facilitation, and shifting processes during executive control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[38]  C. Degueldre,et al.  Regional brain activity during tasks devoted to the central executive of working memory. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  D. Durstewitz,et al.  A Neurocomputational Theory of the Dopaminergic Modulation of Working Memory Functions , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Effect of dopamine transporter genotype on intrinsic functional connectivity depends on cognitive state. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  R. Passingham,et al.  Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Brass,et al.  Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: Meta‐analyses of switching and Stroop studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[45]  K. Lesch,et al.  Dopamine and cognitive control: the influence of spontaneous eyeblink rate and dopamine gene polymorphisms on perseveration and distractibility. , 2005, Behavioral neuroscience.

[46]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Synaptic mechanisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability , 2008, NeuroImage.

[49]  B. Dubois,et al.  Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans: a lesion study. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  D. Vaitl,et al.  Functional correlates of distractor suppression during spatial working memory encoding , 2010, Neuroscience.

[51]  S. Monsell Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  T. Goschke,et al.  Emotional modulation of control dilemmas: The role of positive affect, reward, and dopamine in cognitive stability and flexibility , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[54]  J. Moake,et al.  This article has been cited by other articles , 2003 .

[55]  Amishi P. Jha,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in resolving distractor interference , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[56]  C. Montag,et al.  Effects of dopamine‐related gene–gene interactions on working memory component processes , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[57]  A. Dove,et al.  Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[58]  Ulrike Basten,et al.  Functional Connectivity Separates Switching Operations in the Posterior Lateral Frontal Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  X. Wang,et al.  Synaptic Basis of Cortical Persistent Activity: the Importance of NMDA Receptors to Working Memory , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Cameron S Carter,et al.  Cognitive control involved in overcoming prepotent response tendencies and switching between tasks. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[62]  C. Montag,et al.  Frontostriatal Involvement in Task Switching Depends on Genetic Differences in D2 Receptor Density , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  D. Weinberger,et al.  COMT Val158Met polymorphism, cognitive stability and cognitive flexibility: an experimental examination , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[64]  T. Robbins,et al.  A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[65]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[66]  Merja Haaparanta,et al.  The A1 allele of the human D2 dopamine receptor gene is associated with increased activity of striatal L-amino acid decarboxylase in healthy subjects , 2005, Pharmacogenetics and genomics.

[67]  B. Harrison,et al.  Task-Induced Deactivation from Rest Extends beyond the Default Mode Brain Network , 2011, PloS one.

[68]  M. Banich Executive Function , 2009 .

[69]  Diane Swick,et al.  Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[70]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[71]  Trey Hedden,et al.  Individual differences in executive processing predict susceptibility to interference in verbal working memory. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[72]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[73]  S. H. Richter,et al.  Touchscreen-paradigm for mice reveals cross-species evidence for an antagonistic relationship of cognitive flexibility and stability , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[74]  K. Lesch,et al.  Dopamine and cognitive control: The influence of spontaneous eyeblink rate, DRD4 exon III polymorphism and gender on flexibility in set-shifting , 2007, Brain Research.

[75]  F. Collette,et al.  Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[76]  Marian Stamp Dawkins,et al.  The Noisy Brain: Stochastic Dynamics as a Principle of Brain Function The Noisy Brain: Stochastic Dynamics as a Principle of Brain Function. By Edmund T. Rolls & Gustavo Deco. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2010). Pp. 310. Price £37.95 hardback. , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[77]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Canceling planned action: an FMRI study of countermanding saccades. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[79]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Behavioral Interpretations of Intrinsic Connectivity Networks , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[80]  W. Senn,et al.  Dopamine increases the gain of the input–output response of rat prefrontal pyramidal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. (in press). doi: 10.1152/jn.01098.2007 [epub ahead of print , 2008 .

[81]  Michelle Hampson,et al.  Functional connectivity between task-positive and task-negative brain areas and its relation to working memory performance. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[82]  D. Durstewitz,et al.  The Dual-State Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Dopamine Function with Relevance to Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Genotypes and Schizophrenia , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[83]  A. Grace,et al.  The Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Polymorphism: Relations to the Tonic–Phasic Dopamine Hypothesis and Neuropsychiatric Phenotypes , 2004, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[84]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[85]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Do tasks matter in task switching? Dissociating domain-general from context-specific brain activity , 2014, NeuroImage.

[86]  J. Szentágothai,et al.  Brain Research , 2009, Experimental Neurology.

[87]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced? , 2009, NeuroImage.