REDUCTION OF CROSSTALK IN WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXED FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

In this paper two new methods to reduce the crosstalk in WDM systems are presented. These two methods along with the present methods are analyzed and their performances are compared. The proposed methods yield better results. Both signal power and optical signal power to noise power ratio (OSNR) improve significantly.

[1]  A.E. Willner,et al.  Reduction of coherent crosstalk in WDM add/drop multiplexing nodes by bit pattern misalignment , 1999, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[2]  C.J. Rasmussen,et al.  Theoretical and experimental studies of the influence of the number of crosstalk signals on the penalty caused by incoherent optical crosstalk , 1999, OFC/IOOC . Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 1999, and the International Conference on Integrated Optics and Optical Fiber Communication.

[3]  R.-J. Essiambre,et al.  Coherent crosstalk in ultradense WDM systems , 2005, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  Alan E. Willner,et al.  Comparison of different modulation formats in terrestrial systems with high polarization mode dispersion , 2000, Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Technical Digest Postconference Edition. Trends in Optics and Photonics Vol.37 (IEEE Cat. No. 00CH37079).

[5]  A. Kaszubowska,et al.  Characterisation of wavelength interleaving in radio/fiber systems employing WDM/SCM , 2004, The 17th Annual Meeting of the IEEELasers and Electro-Optics Society, 2004. LEOS 2004..

[6]  H. Kogelnik,et al.  Observation of PMD-induced coherent crosstalk in polarization-multiplexed transmission , 2001, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[7]  A. Kaszubowska-Anandarajah,et al.  Cross Channel Interference due to Wavelength Drift of Tuneable Lasers in DWDM Networks , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks.

[8]  Jerry R. Meyer,et al.  Reducing crosstalk and signal distortion in wavelength-division multiplexing by increasing carrier lifetimes in semiconductor optical amplifiers , 2003 .

[9]  H. Sunnerud,et al.  A comparison between NRZ and RZ data formats with respect to PMD-induced system degradation , 2001, OFC 2001. Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit. Technical Digest Postconference Edition (IEEE Cat. 01CH37171).

[10]  A. Biswas,et al.  Soliton-Soliton Interaction with Kerr Law Nonlinearity , 2005 .

[11]  Seb J. Savory,et al.  Polarisation-channel-interleaved carrier-suppressed RZ ETDM/DWDM transmission at 40 Gbit/s with 0.8 bit/s/Hz spectral efficiency , 2001, Proceedings 27th European Conference on Optical Communication (Cat. No.01TH8551).

[12]  M. Boroditsky,et al.  Reducing adjacent channel interference in RZ WDM systems via dispersion interleaving , 2004, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[13]  Pietro Bernasconi,et al.  Polarisation-mode dispersion impairments in direct-detection differential phase-shift-keying systems , 2002 .

[14]  Nar Singh,et al.  SOLITON BASED OPTICAL COMMUNICATION , 2007 .

[15]  S. Singh,et al.  Nonlinear Scattering Effects in Optical Fibers , 2007 .

[17]  S. Singh,et al.  Nonlinear Effects in Optical Fibers: Origin, Management and Applications , 2007 .

[18]  L Nelson,et al.  Coherent crosstalk impairments in polarization multiplexed transmission due to polarization mode dispersion. , 2000, Optics express.

[19]  A. Biswas,et al.  Soliton-soliton Interaction with Parabolic Law Nonlinearity , 2006 .

[20]  F. Smyth,et al.  Cross-Channel Interference Due to Wavelength Drift of Tunable Lasers in DWDM Networks , 2007, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.