Inertial and Primary Frequency Control for MMC-based MTDC Systems

High penetration of renewable generation is challenging the traditional way system operators manage the grid. The resources required to control frequency and voltage, typically provided by large conventional synchronous generators, will be reduced as this technology is replaced by inverters-based generation. Inertial response and primary frequency regulation has been a permanent concern and subject of research as penetration of renewable generation increases. Voltage Source Converter (VSC) technology using Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) topology presents a bright opportunity in power systems due to its improved performance and controllability advantages. This paper presents a method to emulate inertial and primary frequency response provided by synchronous generators (SGs) using an MMC-based MTDC system. The control system is tested on a MTDC link planned to be integrated to the Chilean grid for a scenario with high penetration of renewable generation. The results show that the control system allows the MTDC system to emulate inertial response and provide primary frequency regulation during generation outages.

[1]  V.G. Agelidis,et al.  VSC-Based HVDC Power Transmission Systems: An Overview , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[2]  Reza Iravani,et al.  Dynamic performance of a modular multilevel back-to-back HVDC system , 2010, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[3]  S. Santoso,et al.  Understanding inertial and frequency response of wind power plants , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power Electronics and Machines in Wind Applications.

[4]  Jean Mahseredjian,et al.  On a new approach for the simulation of transients in power systems , 2007 .

[5]  Jean Mahseredjian,et al.  Accurate Frequency Dependent Cable Model for Electromagnetic Transients , 2016 .

[6]  Andrew J. Roscoe,et al.  Inertia Emulation Control Strategy for VSC-HVDC Transmission Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Cuiqing Du VSC-HVDC for Industrial Power Systems , 2007 .

[8]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[9]  M. Kayikci,et al.  Dynamic Contribution of DFIG-Based Wind Plants to System Frequency Disturbances , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Rainer Marquardt,et al.  An innovative modular multilevel converter topology suitable for a wide power range , 2003, 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings,.

[11]  J. Peralta,et al.  Detailed and Averaged Models for a 401-Level MMC–HVDC System , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[12]  D. Retzmann,et al.  Prospects of multilevel VSC technologies for power transmission , 2008, 2008 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition.

[13]  Guangfu Tang,et al.  New technologies of voltage source converter (VSC) for HVDC transmission system based on VSC , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[14]  Zheng Xu,et al.  Impact of Sampling Frequency on Harmonic Distortion for Modular Multilevel Converter , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[15]  Lingling Fan,et al.  Wind Farms With HVdc Delivery in Inertial Response and Primary Frequency Control , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[16]  J. Jatskevich,et al.  Dynamic Averaged and Simplified Models for MMC-Based HVDC Transmission Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[17]  R. Watson,et al.  Frequency Response Capability of Full Converter Wind Turbine Generators in Comparison to Conventional Generation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.