Enhancing the effects of social network site marketing campaigns

This study assesses the consequences of consumers’ self-disclosing of identification information in interactive advertising campaigns on social network sites (SNSs), for brand, product and campaign responses. Building on social response and brand relationship theory, these effects are predicted and tested in an experiment in which consumers did or did not provide personal information to the brand by interacting with an SNS campaign, identifying consumer concern about disclosing personal information as a moderator. The results demonstrate that consumers’ self-disclosure to the brand elicits favourable attitudinal and behavioural consumer responses, especially for individuals who have relatively low online privacy concerns in the SNS context.

[1]  George R. Milne How Well Do Consumers Protect Themselves from Identity Theft , 2003 .

[2]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  S. Fournier,et al.  Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research , 1998 .

[4]  Charles r. Taylor,et al.  Voluntary self‐disclosure of information on the Internet: A multimethod study of the motivations and consequences of disclosing information on blogs , 2008 .

[5]  S. Utz,et al.  The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms , 2009 .

[6]  Susan B. Barnes,et al.  A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States , 2006, First Monday.

[7]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[8]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[9]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Interpersonal Attraction: An Experimental Test of Two Explanatory Hypotheses , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  J. Phelps,et al.  Privacy Concerns and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information , 2000 .

[11]  T. White,et al.  Consumer Disclosure and Disclosure Avoidance: A Motivational Framework , 2004 .

[12]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Interactive Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Verbal Affection in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2012, Commun. Res..

[13]  S. Jourard,et al.  Cognition, cathexis, and the dyadic effect in men's self-disclosing behavior. , 1960 .

[14]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Self-Disclosure on the Web: the Impact of Privacy Policy, Reward, and Company Reputation , 2002 .

[15]  D’Souza Giles,et al.  The Privacy Paradox: The Case of Secondary Disclosure , 2009 .

[16]  Hyokjin Kwak Self-disclosure in online media , 2012 .

[17]  Tom Kelleher,et al.  Conversational Voice, Communicated Commitment, and Public Relations Outcomes in Interactive Online Communication , 2009 .

[18]  C. S. Holt,et al.  Getting Acquainted: The Relationship of Self-Disclosure and Social Attraction to Positive Affect , 2000 .

[19]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Silent Listeners: The Evolution of Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook , 2013, J. Priv. Confidentiality.

[20]  O. Günther,et al.  Privacy concerns and identity in online social networks , 2009 .

[21]  Tamar Weinberg,et al.  The New Community Rules - Marketing on the Social Web , 2009 .

[22]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[23]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network , 2007, CHI.

[24]  鈴木 聡 Media Equation 研究の背景と動向 , 2011 .

[25]  Michelle Renee Nelson Exploring consumer response to "advergaming" , 2005 .

[26]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[27]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[28]  D. Bem Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[29]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  H. A. Mcallister Self-disclosure and liking: Effects for senders and receivers. , 1980 .

[31]  Yuping Liu,et al.  A Dual-Process Model of Interactivity Effects , 2009 .

[32]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  A Viral Branching Model for Predicting the Spread of Electronic Word of Mouth , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[33]  Guda van Noort,et al.  Online Damage Control: The Effects of Proactive versus Reactive Webcare Interventions in Consumer-generated and Brand-generated Platforms , 2012 .

[34]  Terry Bristol,et al.  Socialization and Adolescents' Skepticism toward Advertising , 1998 .

[35]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[36]  Cheri J. Simonds,et al.  I'll See You On “Facebook”: The Effects of Computer-Mediated Teacher Self-Disclosure on Student Motivation, Affective Learning, and Classroom Climate , 2007 .

[37]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[38]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Information revelation and privacy in online social networks , 2005, WPES '05.

[39]  Seounmi Youn Teenagers' Perceptions of Online Privacy and Coping Behaviors: A Risk–Benefit Appraisal Approach , 2005 .

[40]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Effects of facial similarity on user responses to embodied agents , 2010, TCHI.

[41]  Doo-Hee Lee,et al.  The Influence of Consumer Self-Disclosure on Web Sites on Advertising Response , 2008 .

[42]  Frederick Plotkin,et al.  I. SELF-DISCLOSURE , 1971 .

[43]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[44]  Balaji Rajagopalan,et al.  Knowledge-sharing and influence in online social networks via viral marketing , 2003, CACM.

[45]  Youngme Moon Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers , 2000 .

[46]  Tom Kelleher,et al.  Organizational Blogs and the Human Voice: Relational Strategies and Relational Outcomes , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[47]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Assessing the Cross-National Applicability of Consumer Behavior Models: A Model of Attitude toward Advertising in General , 1993 .

[48]  A. A. Mitchell,et al.  The Effect of Verbal and Visual Components of Advertisements on Brand Attitudes and Attitude Toward the Advertisement , 1986 .

[49]  Youngme Moon,et al.  Don’t Blame the Computer: When Self-Disclosure Moderates the Self-Serving Bias , 2003 .

[50]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  A Field Experiment Comparing Information-Privacy Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes Across Several Types of Organizations , 1983 .

[51]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[52]  H. Jeff Smith,et al.  Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals' Concerns About Organizational Practices , 1996, MIS Q..

[53]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Responses to Humorous Advertising: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognition , 1996 .

[54]  Shu-Chuan Chu,et al.  Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites , 2011 .

[55]  James W. Peltier,et al.  Information Privacy Research: Framework for Integrating Multiple Publics, Information Channels, and Responses , 2009 .

[56]  A. Cooper,et al.  Romance in Cyberspace: Understanding Online Attraction , 1997 .

[57]  Hilde A. M. Voorveld,et al.  Websites in Brand Communication: Interactivity and Cross-Media Effects , 2010 .

[58]  Eva A van Reijmersdal,et al.  Social connections and the persuasiveness of viral campaigns in social network sites: Persuasive intent as the underlying mechanism , 2012 .