Reaching to grasp with a multi-jointed arm. I. Computational model.

The generation of goal-directed movements requires the solution of many difficult computational problems. Among these are transformations from extrinsic to intrinsic reference frames, specifying solution paths, removing under-specification due to excess degrees of freedom and path multiplicity, constraint satisfaction, and error correction. There are no current motor-control computational models that address these issues in the context of realistic arm movement with redundant degrees of freedom. In this paper, we conjecture there is a geometric stage between sensory input and physical execution. The geometric stage determines movement trajectories independently of forces. It uses a gradient technique that relies on the metric of the space of postures to resolve endpoint path selection, posture-change specification, error correction, and multiple constraint satisfaction on-line without preplanning. The model is instantiated in an arm with seven degrees of freedom that moves in three-dimensional space. Simulated orientation-matching movements are compared with actual human movement data to assess the validity of several of the model's behavioral predictions.

[1]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[2]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Resolved Motion Rate Control of Manipulators and Human Prostheses , 1969 .

[3]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Parallel computations for controlling an arm. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Energy constraints on parameterized models , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[7]  BarrAlan,et al.  Energy constraints on parameterized models , 1987 .

[8]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[9]  宇野 洋二,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement : minimum torque-change model , 1988 .

[10]  A. Zamorzaev,et al.  Rotations, quaternions and double groups by S. Altmann , 1988 .

[11]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. , 1988, Psychological review.

[12]  Eileen Kowler Cognitive expectations, not habits, control anticipatory smooth oculomotor pursuit , 1989, Vision Research.

[13]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  A. Gray Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces , 1993 .

[16]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement? , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  Alfred Gray,et al.  Modern differential geometry of curves and surfaces withmathematica , 1997 .

[18]  Alexander Rm,et al.  A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories. , 1997 .

[19]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Postural control of three-dimensional prehension movements. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and size , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[22]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Final posture of the upper limb depends on the initial position of the hand during prehension movements , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Jean Pierre Verriest,et al.  A geometric algorithm to predict the arm reach posture for computer‐aided ergonomic evaluation , 1998 .

[24]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Flanders,et al.  Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching? , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  D J Ostry,et al.  Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movement. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Parietal area 5 neuronal activity encodes movement kinematics, not movement dynamics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  P. Morasso,et al.  Anthropomorphic robotics , 1980, Biological Cybernetics.