Effect of ethanol addition in gasoline and gasoline–surrogate on soot formation in turbulent spray flames

Abstract The effect of ethanol on soot formation has been studied in turbulent spray flames of gasoline/ethanol and gasoline–surrogate/ethanol mixtures containing 10%, 20% and 30% of alcohol in volume. A hybrid burner specially designed to stabilize different liquid fuels flames with identical hydrodynamic conditions has been used. Spatially resolved measurements of soot volume fraction and of soot precursors concentration have been carried out by coupling Laser-Induced Incandescence (LII) at 1064 nm and Laser-Induced Fluorescence (LIF) at 532 nm. Significant reductions of the concentrations of soot and soot precursors have been observed when adding ethanol to gasoline. A similar behaviour has been obtained with a gasoline–surrogate which has been found to reproduce well the sooting propensity of the unleaded gasoline used in this work. The analysis of the correlation existing between the peak soot volume fraction measured in flames and the Threshold Soot Index (TSI) of the different mixtures tested in this work revealed that the effect of ethanol was not only a dilution one but that the oxygen contained in the alcohol also influence the soot formation. Finally, the comparison of the LII fluence curves and time decays obtained in gasoline/ethanol mixtures showed that soot particles oxidized faster when ethanol is added to the base fuel.

[1]  H. Michelsen Understanding and predicting the temporal response of laser-induced incandescence from carbonaceous particles , 2003 .

[2]  Can Çinar,et al.  The effects of ethanol–unleaded gasoline blends and ignition timing on engine performance and exhaust emissions , 2006 .

[3]  Dimitrios C. Rakopoulos,et al.  Multi-zone modeling of combustion and emissions formation in DI diesel engine operating on ethanol–diesel fuel blends , 2008 .

[4]  Juhun Song,et al.  Examination of the oxidation behavior of biodiesel soot , 2006 .

[5]  E. Therssen,et al.  Determination of the ratio of soot refractive index function E(m) at the two wavelengths 532 and 1064 nm by laser induced incandescence , 2007 .

[6]  E. R. Jayaratne,et al.  Particle and carbon dioxide emissions from passenger vehicles operating on unleaded petrol and LPG fuel. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Havva Balat,et al.  Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel , 2009 .

[8]  Electo Eduardo Silva Lora,et al.  Biofuels: Environment, technology and food security , 2009 .

[9]  Simsoo Park,et al.  Time-resolved particle emission and size distribution characteristics during dynamic engine operation conditions with ethanol-blended fuels , 2009 .

[10]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  Reduction of PAH and soot in premixed ethylene–air flames by addition of ethanol , 2006 .

[11]  José Ricardo Sodré,et al.  Hydrous ethanol vs. gasoline-ethanol blend: Engine performance and emissions , 2010 .

[12]  Seong-Young Lee,et al.  REDUCTION OF PAH AND SOOT IN PREMIXED ETHYLENE-AIR FLAMES BY ADDITION OF DIMETHYL ETHER , 2006 .

[13]  Nicholas P. Cernansky,et al.  The oxidation of a gasoline surrogate in the negative temperature coefficient region , 2009 .

[14]  Can Çinar,et al.  Effect of ethanol-gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust emissions in different compression ratios , 2006 .

[15]  Stefan Will,et al.  Laser-induced incandescence: recent trends and current questions , 2006 .

[16]  Y. Levendis,et al.  Investigation of critical equivalence ratio and chemical speciation in flames of ethylbenzene–ethanol blends , 2010 .

[17]  R. Lemaire,et al.  Experimental comparison of soot formation in turbulent flames of Diesel and surrogate Diesel fuels , 2009 .

[18]  B. Bennett,et al.  Computational and experimental study of the effects of adding dimethyl ether and ethanol to nonpremixed ethylene/air flames , 2009 .

[19]  Tsung-Lin Wu,et al.  Engine performance and pollutant emission of an SI engine using ethanol–gasoline blended fuels , 2002 .

[20]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  On-road and laboratory evaluation of combustion aerosols—Part 2:: Summary of spark ignition engine results , 2006 .

[21]  R. J. Gill,et al.  Estimation of Soot Thresholds for Fuel Mixtures , 1984 .

[22]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Shock tube determination of ignition delay times in full-blend and surrogate fuel mixtures , 2004 .

[23]  G. Adomeit,et al.  Self-ignition of S.I. engine model fuels: A shock tube investigation at high pressure ☆ , 1997 .

[24]  C. McEnally,et al.  Fuel decomposition and hydrocarbon growth processes for oxygenated hydrocarbons: butyl alcohols , 2005 .

[25]  Jiming Hao,et al.  A study on emission characteristics of an EFI engine with ethanol blended gasoline fuels , 2003 .

[26]  Jürgen Warnatz,et al.  A detailed chemical kinetic reaction mechanism for the oxidation of iso-octane and n-heptane over an extended temperature range and its application to analysis of engine knock , 1989 .

[27]  V. Katta,et al.  Fuel Additive Effects on Soot across a Suite of Laboratory Devices, Part 1: Ethanol , 2009 .

[28]  Selim M. Senkan,et al.  Effects of oxygenate additives on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(pahs) and soot formation , 2002 .

[29]  Ayhan Demirbas,et al.  Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections , 2008 .

[30]  H. Pitsch,et al.  Structural group analysis for soot reduction tendency of oxygenated fuels , 2008 .

[31]  H. F. Calcote,et al.  Effect of molecular structure on incipient soot formation , 1983 .

[32]  Byungchul Choi,et al.  The effect of biodiesel and bioethanol blended diesel fuel on nanoparticles and exhaust emissions from CRDI diesel engine , 2010 .

[33]  Octavio Armas,et al.  Emissions from a diesel–bioethanol blend in an automotive diesel engine , 2008 .

[34]  Adel F. Sarofim,et al.  Combustion generated fine carbonaceous particles , 2009 .

[35]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Development of an Experimental Database and Chemical Kinetic Models for Surrogate Gasoline Fuels , 2007 .

[36]  H. L. Walmsley,et al.  Particulate and Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Spray Guided Direct Injection Spark Ignition Engine with Oxygenate Fuel Blends , 2007 .

[37]  E. Therssen,et al.  Molecular species adsorbed on soot particles issued from low sooting methane and acetylene laminar flames: A laser-based experiment , 2007 .

[38]  C. McEnally,et al.  The effects of dimethyl ether and ethanol on benzene and soot formation in ethylene nonpremixed flames , 2007 .

[39]  Y. Mu,et al.  Carbonyls emission from ethanol-blended gasoline and biodiesel-ethanol-diesel used in engines , 2008 .

[40]  C. McEnally,et al.  Improved sooting tendency measurements for aromatic hydrocarbons and their implications for naphthalene formation pathways , 2007 .

[41]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Chemical kinetic modeling study of the effects of oxygenated hydrocarbons on soot emissions from diesel engines. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[42]  R. J. Gill,et al.  The effects of molecular structure on soot formation II. Diffusion flames , 1985 .

[43]  R. Lemaire,et al.  Original use of a direct injection high efficiency nebulizer for the standardization of liquid fuels spray flames. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[44]  Wang Jian-xin,et al.  Study on combustion characteristics and PM emission of diesel engines using ester–ethanol–diesel blended fuels , 2007 .

[45]  Jun Wang,et al.  Influence of ethanol-gasoline blended fuel on emission characteristics from a four-stroke motorcycle engine. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.