3D-printed soft-tissue physical models of renal malignancies for individualized surgical simulation: a feasibility study

To construct patient-specific physical three-dimensional (3D) models of renal units with materials that approximates the properties of renal tissue to allow pre-operative and robotic training surgical simulation, 3D physical kidney models were created (3DSystems, Rock Hill, SC) using computerized tomography to segment structures of interest (parenchyma, vasculature, collection system, and tumor). Images were converted to a 3D surface mesh file for fabrication using a multi-jet 3D printer. A novel construction technique was employed to approximate normal renal tissue texture, printers selectively deposited photopolymer material forming the outer shell of the kidney, and subsequently, an agarose gel solution was injected into the inner cavity recreating the spongier renal parenchyma. We constructed seven models of renal units with suspected malignancies. Partial nephrectomy and renorrhaphy were performed on each of the replicas. Subsequently all patients successfully underwent robotic partial nephrectomy. Average tumor diameter was 4.4 cm, warm ischemia time was 25 min, RENAL nephrometry score was 7.4, and surgical margins were negative. A comparison was made between the seven cases and the Tulane Urology prospectively maintained robotic partial nephrectomy database. Patients with surgical models had larger tumors, higher nephrometry score, longer warm ischemic time, fewer positive surgical margins, shorter hospitalization, and fewer post-operative complications; however, the only significant finding was lower estimated blood loss (186 cc vs 236; p = 0.01). In this feasibility study, pre-operative resectable physical 3D models can be constructed and used as patient-specific surgical simulation tools; further study will need to demonstrate if this results in improvement of surgical outcomes and robotic simulation education.

[1]  Anup Kumar,et al.  Current status of robotic simulators in acquisition of robotic surgical skills , 2015, Current opinion in urology.

[2]  Y. Na,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of renal tumors: a preliminary report , 2016, World Journal of Urology.

[3]  I. Gill,et al.  Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[4]  M. Aron,et al.  Novel training methods for robotic surgery , 2014, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[5]  Swar H. Shah,et al.  Development and Validation of a Novel Robotic Procedure Specific Simulation Platform: Partial Nephrectomy. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[6]  Jaime Landman,et al.  Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents. , 2011, Urology.

[7]  A. Tewari,et al.  Residency Training Program Paradigms for Teaching Robotic Surgical Skills to Urology Residents , 2010, Current urology reports.

[8]  Raju Thomas,et al.  Physical models of renal malignancies using standard cross-sectional imaging and 3-dimensional printers: a pilot study. , 2014, Urology.

[9]  B. Brenner Brenner and Rector's The Kidney , 2000 .

[10]  L. Eichel,et al.  Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2006, Urology.

[11]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Multi-institutional analysis of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors >4 cm versus ≤ 4 cm in 445 consecutive patients. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[12]  E. Castle,et al.  Robotics in urologic surgery: An evolving new technology , 2006, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[13]  Michael M. Maddox,et al.  Individualized Physical 3-dimensional Kidney Tumor Models Constructed From 3-dimensional Printers Result in Improved Trainee Anatomic Understanding. , 2015, Urology.

[14]  Thomas Looi,et al.  Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. , 2014, Journal of surgical education.

[15]  M. Schijven,et al.  Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  Michael A Liss,et al.  Robotic Surgical Simulation , 2013, Cancer journal.

[17]  Ananth Annapragada,et al.  Application of 3-D printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disorders , 2014, Pediatric Radiology.

[18]  T. Kesavadas,et al.  Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. , 2010, Urology.

[19]  Inderbir S Gill,et al.  Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. , 2010, European urology.

[20]  P. Mehra,et al.  Use of 3-D Stereolithographic Models in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , 2011, Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery.