“Nuclear energy sounded wonderful 40 years ago”: UK citizen views on CCS

Around the world there is increasing interest from government and industry in the potential for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies to play a part in decarbonisation. This paper examines how people with little previous exposure to CCS technology, frame and discuss it, and how in the absence of information, ideas, notions, values and experiences shape opinion. We present data from a series of focus groups held with environmental activists, planning councillors, and adult and youth community group members in London in 2012. We found that views on CCS are shaped strongly by wider factors, particularly trade offs between different energy futures. Lay-critiques were similar to those put forward by environmental groups and were strongly framed by conceptions of nuclear power. We argue that although there is little public disquiet concerning this technology in private opinions were generally negative. This, and the use of nuclear power as a framing device, may present a challenge to policy-makers and industry committed to implementing CCS while promoting education as the main mechanism for public acceptance.

[1]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology? , 2006, Nature nanotechnology.

[2]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  Biotechnology in the public sphere: a European sourcebook. , 1998 .

[3]  J. Durant,et al.  Attitudes of selected public groups in the UK to biotechnology. , 1992 .

[4]  Al Anneloes Meijnders,et al.  Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage , 2007 .

[5]  P. Vergragt.  CCS in the Netherlands: Glass Half Empty or Half Full? , 2009 .

[6]  J. Gibbins,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage , 2008 .

[7]  Benjamin Evar,et al.  The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage , 2012 .

[8]  R. Farr,et al.  Common sense, science and social representations , 1993 .

[9]  André Faaij,et al.  Informed and uninformed public opinions on CO2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[10]  P. Upham,et al.  Public perceptions of CCS: Emergent themes in pan-European focus groups and implications for communications , 2011 .

[11]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  From research to action: now we have to move on CCS communication , 2010 .

[12]  William J. Nuttall,et al.  Public Acceptance of Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: Similarities and Differences , 2011 .

[13]  Douglas Powell,et al.  Public Perceptions of Biotechnology , 2002 .

[14]  M. Maslin,et al.  Public Participation and Climate Change Infrastructure , 2013 .

[15]  Costas Tsouris,et al.  Is carbon capture and storage really needed? , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Social amplification of risk: the media and public response , 1989 .

[17]  Graham Murdock,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: After amplification: rethinking the role of the media in risk communication , 2003 .

[18]  Oded Netzer,et al.  The Synthesis of Preference: Bridging Behavioral Decision Research and Marketing Science , 2008 .

[19]  Hauke Riesch,et al.  BEYOND ‘FOR OR AGAINST’: Environmental NGO-evaluations of CCS as a climate change solution , 2012 .

[20]  Simon Shackley,et al.  ‘Tell me what you Think about the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide’: Towards a Fuller Understanding of Public Perceptions of CCS , 2013 .

[21]  J. Watson,et al.  Strategies for the deployment of CCS technologies in the UK: a critical review , 2009 .

[22]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Focus Groups: Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[23]  F. Tóth,et al.  Geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste : a comparative assessment , 2011 .

[24]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies , 2007 .

[25]  Gene Rowe,et al.  Lay perceptions of carbon capture and storage technology , 2010 .

[26]  A. Stirling.  Opening Up Or Closing Down? Analysis, Participation And Power In The Social Appraisal Of Technology , 2005 .

[27]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[28]  Dominik Möst,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage on its way to large-scale deployment: Social acceptance and willingness to pay in Germany , 2012 .

[29]  Paul Upham,et al.  Internet-based public debate of CCS: Lessons from online focus groups in Poland and Spain , 2013 .

[30]  D. Graber,et al.  Political Communication Faces the 21st Century , 2005 .

[31]  David Stewart,et al.  Focus groups: Theory and practice, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[32]  L. Frewer,et al.  RISK PERCEPTION, SOCIAL TRUST, AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING : IMPLICATIONS FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES , 1999 .

[33]  Anike Peters.  False Hope Why Carbon Capture and Storage Won't save the Climate , 2012 .

[34]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: Contents , 2003 .

[35]  J. Durant,et al.  The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain , 1995 .

[36]  Nils Markusson,et al.  The social and political complexities of learning in carbon capture and storage demonstration projects , 2011 .

[37]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  An international comparison of public attitudes towards carbon capture and storage technologies , 2006 .

[38]  S. Brunsting,et al.  What happened in Barendrecht?! Case study on the planned onshore carbon dioxide storage in Barendrecht, the Netherlands , 2010 .

[39]  Elizabeth L. Malone,et al.  Moving from misinformation derived from public attitude surveys on carbon dioxide capture and storage towards realistic stakeholder involvement , 2010 .

[40]  R. Fazio,et al.  The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music? , 2006, Public Health Genomics.

[42]  Emma ter Mors,et al.  It's not only about safety: Beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht , 2012 .

[43]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies , 2005 .

[44]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey , 2004 .

[46]  Bart W. Terwel,et al.  Public awareness and perceptions of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS): Insights from surveys administered to representative samples in six European countries , 2011 .

[47]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Exploring the Structure of Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Food , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[48]  Gabrielle Wong-Parodi,et al.  The Role of Social Factors in Shaping Public Perceptions of CCS: Results of Multi-State Focus Group Interviews in the U.S. , 2009 .

[49]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Transforming the UK energy system: public values, attitudes and acceptability: synthesis report , 2013 .

[50]  L. Gofton,et al.  Developing Focus Group Research. Politics, Theory and Practice. , 2000 .

[51]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[52]  Anders Hansson,et al.  Expert opinions on carbon dioxide capture and storage—A framing of uncertainties and possibilities , 2009 .

[53]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Deliberating Energy System Transitions in the UK , 2013 .

[54]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Stakeholder attitudes on carbon capture and storage -- An international comparison , 2009 .

[55]  Michael Oppenheimer,et al.  The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage: Framing an emergent technology , 2011 .

[56]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[57]  Minh Ha-Duong,et al.  A survey on the public perception of CCS in France , 2009 .

[58]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  Public acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage in a proposed demonstration area , 2009 .