Interpersonal Anticipatory Synchronization: The Facilitating Role of Short Visual-Motor Feedback Delays

Effective interpersonal coordination is fundamental to robust social interaction, and the ability to anticipate a co-actor’s behavior is essential for achieving this coordination. However, coordination research has focused on the behavioral synchrony that occurs between the simple periodic movements of co-actors and, thus, little is known about the anticipation that occurs during complex, everyday interaction. Research on the dynamics of coupled neurons, human motor control, electrical circuits, and laser semiconductors universally demonstrates that small temporal feedback delays are necessary for the anticipation of chaotic events. We therefore investigated whether similar feedback delays would promote anticipatory behavior during social interaction. Results revealed that co-actors were not only able to anticipate others’ chaotic movements when experiencing small perceptual-motor delays, but also exhibited movement patterns of equivalent complexity. This suggests that such delays, including those within the human nervous system, may enhance, rather than hinder, the anticipatory processes that underlie successful social interaction.

[1]  Michael J Richardson,et al.  Period Basin of Entrainment for Unintentional Visual Coordination , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Dynamics of Interpersonal Coordination , 2008 .

[3]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  On strong anticipation , 2010, Cognitive Systems Research.

[4]  U. Alon,et al.  The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Strong anticipation: Sensitivity to long-range correlations in synchronization behavior , 2008 .

[6]  Damian G. Kelty-Stephen,et al.  When physics is not "just physics": complexity science invites new measurement frames for exploring the physics of cognitive and biological development. , 2012, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[7]  J. Decety,et al.  From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[8]  James A. Dixon,et al.  Strong anticipation: Multifractal cascade dynamics modulate scaling in synchronization behaviors , 2011 .

[9]  K M Newell,et al.  On Learning to Move Randomly , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Anticipating synchronization as an alternative to the internal model , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Recurrence Quantification as an Analysis of Temporal Coordination with Complex Signals , 2014 .

[12]  E. M. Shahverdiev,et al.  Experimental demonstration of anticipating synchronization in chaotic semiconductor lasers with optical feedback. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[13]  A. Wing,et al.  Optimal feedback correction in string quartet synchronization , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  Didier Delignières,et al.  Strong anticipation and long-range cross-correlation: Application of detrended cross-correlation analysis to human behavioral data , 2014 .

[15]  O. Calvo,et al.  Characterization of the anticipated synchronization regime in the coupled FitzHugh–Nagumo model for neurons , 2003 .

[16]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Nigel Stepp,et al.  Anticipation in feedback-delayed manual tracking of a chaotic oscillator , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Yasuji Sawada,et al.  Transition from an antiphase error-correction mode to a synchronization mode in mutual hand tracking. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Henning U. Voss,et al.  Real-Time Anticipation of Chaotic States of an Electronic Circuit , 2002, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.