Development and Use of Machine-Learnt Algebraic Reynolds Stress Models for Enhanced Prediction of Wake Mixing in LPTs

Non-linear turbulence closures were developed that improve the prediction accuracy of wake mixing in low-pressure turbine (LPT) flows. First, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) calculations using five linear turbulence closures were performed for the T106A LPT profile at exit Mach number 0.4 and isentropic exit Reynolds numbers 60,000 and 100,000. None of these RANS models were able to accurately reproduce wake loss profiles, a crucial parameter in LPT design, from direct numerical simulation (DNS) reference data. However, the recently proposed kv2w transition model was found to produce the best agreement with DNS data in terms of blade loading and boundary layer behavior and thus was selected as baseline model for turbulence closure development. Analysis of the DNS data revealed that the linear stress-strain coupling constitutes one of the main model form errors. Hence, a geneexpression programming (GEP) based machine-learning technique was applied to the high-fidelity DNS data to train non-linear explicit algebraic Reynolds stress models (EARSM). In particular, the GEP algorithm was tasked to minimize the weighted difference between the DNS and RANS anisotropy tensors, using different training regions. The trained models were first assessed in an a priori sense (without running any CFD) and showed much improved alignment of the trained models in the region of training. Additional RANS calculations were then performed using the trained models. Importantly, to assess their robustness, the trained models were tested both on the cases they were trained for and on testing, i.e. previously not seen, cases with different flow features. The developed models improved prediction of the Reynolds stress, TKE production, wake-loss profiles and wake maturity, across all cases, in particular those trained on just the wake region.

[1]  Howard P. Hodson,et al.  The Transition Mechanism of Highly-Loaded LP Turbine Blades , 2003 .

[2]  Jinlong Wu,et al.  Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data , 2016, 1606.07987.

[3]  Florian R. Menter,et al.  Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes , 2009 .

[4]  V. Michelassi,et al.  Development and Use of Machine-Learnt Algebraic Reynolds Stress Models for Enhanced Prediction of Wake Mixing in Low-Pressure Turbines , 2019, Journal of Turbomachinery.

[5]  D. K. Walters,et al.  Prediction of transitional and fully turbulent flow using an alternative to the laminar kinetic energy approach , 2016 .

[6]  John P. Clark,et al.  Performance Impacts Due to Wake Mixing in Axial-Flow Turbomachinery , 2006 .

[7]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[8]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  The development of algebraic stress models using a novel evolutionary algorithm , 2017 .

[9]  Michael A. Leschziner,et al.  Statistical Turbulence Modelling For Fluid Dynamics - Demystified: An Introductory Text For Graduate Engineering Students , 2015 .

[10]  Mark McQuilling,et al.  Evaluation of RANS Transition Modeling for High Lift LPT Flows at Low Reynolds Number , 2013 .

[11]  F. Schmitt About Boussinesq's turbulent viscosity hypothesis: historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity , 2007 .

[12]  Brendan D. Tracey,et al.  A Machine Learning Strategy to Assist Turbulence Model Development , 2015 .

[13]  Arne V. Johansson,et al.  An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible turbulent flows , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  W. Rodi A new algebraic relation for calculating the Reynolds stresses , 1976 .

[15]  Anand Pratap Singh,et al.  New Approaches in Turbulence and Transition Modeling Using Data-driven Techniques , 2015 .

[16]  R. E. Mayle,et al.  The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines , 1991 .

[17]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[18]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  Compressible direct numerical simulation of low-pressure turbines: part I - methodology , 2014 .

[19]  F. Bertini,et al.  Predicting High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbine Cascades Flow Using Transition-Sensitive Turbulence Closures , 2014 .

[20]  Richard Sandberg,et al.  A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress-strain relationship , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  E. Dick,et al.  Transition Models for Turbomachinery Boundary Layer Flows: A Review , 2017 .

[22]  Paul A. Durbin,et al.  A Procedure for Using DNS Databases , 1998 .

[23]  D. K. Walters,et al.  A Three-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Model for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Transitional Flow , 2008 .

[24]  Jens Friedrichs,et al.  Improved Turbulence and Transition Prediction for Turbomachinery Flows , 2014 .

[25]  S. Pope A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  H. Hodson,et al.  BLADEROW INTERACTIONS, TRANSITION, AND HIGH-LIFT AEROFOILS IN LOW-PRESSURE TURBINES , 2005 .

[27]  T. Gatski,et al.  On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  R. Mayle,et al.  The Path to Predicting Bypass Transition , 1996 .

[29]  Liwei Chen,et al.  Compressible Direct Numerical Simulation of Low-Pressure Turbines—Part II: Effect of Inflow Disturbances , 2015 .

[30]  G. Laskowski,et al.  Machine Learning for Turbulence Model Development Using a High-Fidelity HPT Cascade Simulation , 2017 .

[31]  Cândida Ferreira,et al.  Gene Expression Programming: A New Adaptive Algorithm for Solving Problems , 2001, Complex Syst..

[32]  D. K. Walters,et al.  A Recommended Correction to the kT−kL−ω Transition-Sensitive Eddy-Viscosity Model , 2017 .

[33]  Leonhard Fottner,et al.  A Test Case for the Numerical Investigation of Wake Passing Effects on a Highly Loaded LP Turbine Cascade Blade , 2001 .