Medial Gastrocnemius Myoelectric Control of a Robotic Ankle Exoskeleton

A previous study from our laboratory showed that when soleus electromyography was used to control the amount of plantar flexion assistance from a robotic ankle exoskeleton, subjects significantly reduced their soleus activity to quickly return to normal gait kinematics. We speculated that subjects were primarily responding to the local mechanical assistance of the exoskeleton rather than directly attempting to reduce exoskeleton mechanical power via decreases in soleus activity. To test this observation we studied ten healthy subjects walking on a treadmill at 1.25 m/s while wearing a robotic exoskeleton proportionally controlled by medial gastrocnemius activation. We hypothesized that subjects would primarily decrease soleus activity due to its synergistic mechanics with the exoskeleton. Subjects decreased medial gastrocnemius recruitment by 12% (p < 0.05) but decreased soleus recruitment by 27% (p < 0.05). In agreement with our hypothesis, the primary reduction in muscle activity was not for the control muscle (medial gastrocnemius) but for the anatomical synergist to the exoskeleton (soleus). These findings indicate that anatomical morphology needs to be considered carefully when designing software and hardware for robotic exoskeletons.

[1]  A. McComas,et al.  Influence of joint position on ankle plantarflexion in humans. , 1982, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[2]  A. English,et al.  An anatomical and functional analysis of cat biceps femoris and semitendinosus muscles , 1987, Journal of morphology.

[3]  G. V. I. Schenau On the Action of Bi-Articular Muscles, a Review , 1989 .

[4]  G. V. I. Schenau Proposed actions of bi-articular muscles and the design of hindlimbs of bi- and quadrupeds , 1994 .

[5]  C. Pratt,et al.  Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking V. Mutable activation of bifunctional thigh muscles. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  F. Zajac,et al.  Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  V. Dietz,et al.  Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[8]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Kinetics of Human Motion , 2002 .

[9]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Comfortable power assist control method for walking aid by HAL-3 , 2002, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[10]  H. Herr,et al.  Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Influence of gastrocnemius muscle length on triceps surae torque development and electromyographic activity in man , 1995, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Yasuhisa Hasegawa,et al.  Intention-based walking support for paraplegia patient , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[13]  S. Prentice,et al.  Adaptation to unilateral change in lower limb mechanical properties during human walking , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  The effects of powered ankle-foot orthoses on joint kinematics and muscle activation during walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  G.S. Sawicki,et al.  Powered lower limb orthoses: applications in motor adaptation and rehabilitation , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[16]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  The Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton , 2006, FSR.

[17]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation. , 2005, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[18]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  An improved powered ankle-foot orthosis using proportional myoelectric control. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[19]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Mechanical performance of artificial pneumatic muscles to power an ankle-foot orthosis. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  H. Kazerooni,et al.  Biomechanical design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX) , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[21]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  E. Fetz Volitional control of neural activity: implications for brain–computer interfaces , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  S.K. Agrawal,et al.  Assessment of Motion of a Swing Leg and Gait Rehabilitation With a Gravity Balancing Exoskeleton , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  B. Dobkin Brain–computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Michael H Schwartz,et al.  An exploration of the function of the triceps surae during normal gait using functional electrical stimulation. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[28]  Ken Endo,et al.  A Quasi-Passive Leg Exoskeleton for Load-Carrying Augmentation , 2007, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[29]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Learning to walk with a robotic ankle exoskeleton. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  The effect of walking speed on muscle function and mechanical energetics. , 2008, Gait & posture.