Evaluation of a bivalent (CVD 103-HgR/CVD 111) live oral cholera vaccine in adult volunteers from the United States and Peru

To provide optimum protection against classical and El Tor biotypes of Vibrio cholerae O1, a single-dose, oral cholera vaccine was developed by combining two live, attenuated vaccine strains, CVD 103-HgR (classical, Inaba) and CVD 111 (El Tor, Ogawa). The vaccines were formulated in a double-chamber sachet; one chamber contained lyophilized bacteria, and the other contained buffer. In the first study, 23 U.S. adult volunteers received CVD 103-HgR at 10(8) CFU plus CVD 111 at 10(8), 10(7), or 10(6) CFU, CVD 111 alone at 10(7) CFU, or placebo. In the second study, 275 Peruvian adults were randomized to receive CVD 103-HgR at 10(9) CFU plus CVD 111 at 10(9) or 10(8) CFU, CVD 111 alone at 10(9) CFU, CVD 103-HgR alone at 10(9) CFU, or placebo. Three of 15 U.S. volunteers who received CVD 111 at 10(7) or 10(8) CFU developed mild diarrhea, compared to none of 4 who received CVD 111 at 10(6) CFU and 1 of 4 who received placebo. Twelve (63%) of 19 vaccine recipients shed the El Tor vaccine strain. All but one volunteer developed significant Ogawa and Inaba vibriocidal antibody titers. Volunteers who received CVD 111 at 10(7) CFU had geometric mean Ogawa titers four to five times higher than those of volunteers who received the lower dose. In the second study, all dosage regimens were well tolerated in Peruvians. About 20% of volunteers who received CVD 111 at the high dose excreted the El Tor organism, compared to 7% in the low-dose group. CVD 111 was detected in the stools of two placebo recipients, neither of whom had symptoms or seroconverted. In all vaccine groups, 69 to 76% developed fourfold rises in Inaba vibriocidal antibodies. Among those who received the bivalent vaccine, 53 to 75% also developed significant rises in Ogawa vibriocidal antibodies. We conclude that it is feasible to produce a single-dose, oral bivalent vaccine that is safe and immunogenic against both biotypes (El Tor and classical) and both serotypes (Inaba and Ogawa) of cholera for populations in both developed and developing parts of the world.

[1]  D. Spriggs,et al.  Peru-15, an improved live attenuated oral vaccine candidate for Vibrio cholerae O1. , 1995, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  P. Griffin,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of cholera in the United States. Are we prepared? , 1994, JAMA.

[3]  M. Levine,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of different immunization regimens of CVD 103-HgR live oral cholera vaccine in soldiers and civilians in Thailand. , 1992, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[4]  M. Levine,et al.  Onset and duration of protective immunity in challenged volunteers after vaccination with live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR. , 1992, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  G. Losonsky,et al.  Safety, immunogenicity, and excretion pattern of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in Peruvian adults of high and low socioeconomic levels , 1993, Infection and immunity.

[6]  C. Tacket,et al.  SAFETY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF RECOMBINANT LIVE ORAL CHOLERA VACCINES, CVD 103 AND CVD 103-HgR , 1988, The Lancet.

[7]  Suharyono,et al.  Safety, immunogenicity, and transmissibility of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR in 24- to 59-month-old Indonesian children. , 1993, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[8]  D. Sack,et al.  Biotype as determinant of natural immunising effect of cholera , 1991, The Lancet.

[9]  M. Levine,et al.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure antibodies to purified heat-labile enterotoxins from human and porcine strains of Escherichia coli and to cholera toxin: application in serodiagnosis and seroepidemiology , 1985, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  R. Glass,et al.  Epidemic cholera in the Americas. , 1992, Science.

[11]  Matthew K. Waldor,et al.  Lysogenic Conversion by a Filamentous Phage Encoding Cholera Toxin , 1996, Science.

[12]  M. Levine,et al.  Volunteer studies investigating the safety and efficacy of live oral El Tor Vibrio cholerae O1 vaccine strain CVD 111. , 1997, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[13]  M. Levine,et al.  Attenuated live cholera vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR elicits significantly higher serum vibriocidal antibody titers in persons of blood group O , 1995, Infection and immunity.

[14]  M. Levine,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of live oral cholera vaccine candidate CVD 110, a delta ctxA delta zot delta ace derivative of El Tor Ogawa Vibrio cholerae. , 1993, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[15]  Suharyono,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in 5-9-year-old Indonesian children , 1992, The Lancet.

[16]  M. Levine,et al.  Magnitude, kinetics, and duration of vibriocidal antibody responses in North Americans after ingestion of Vibrio cholerae. , 1982, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[17]  M. Levine,et al.  Practical and economical method for using biotinylated DNA probes with bacterial colony blots to identify diarrhea-causing Escherichia coli , 1990, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[18]  H. Dupont,et al.  Acute enteric infections in Children: New prospects for treatment and prevention , 1983 .

[19]  J. Kaper,et al.  Nucleotide sequence analysis of the A2 and B subunits of Vibrio cholerae enterotoxin. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[20]  M. Levine,et al.  Potential for reacquisition of cholera enterotoxin genes by attenuated Vibrio cholerae vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR , 1994, Infection and immunity.

[21]  J. Ezzell,et al.  Development of a live, oral, attenuated vaccine against El Tor cholera. , 1994, The Journal of infectious diseases.